Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

REDD+ Application in Southeast Asia: Legal Challenges and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in Climate Change Mitigation

International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia · Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026) · pp. 1–43

DOI
10.15294/ildisea.v5i1.36056
ISSN
2829-9655, 2830-0297
Published
2026-06-15
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Indigenous peoples, whose cultural and ecological connections to forests are profound, are disproportionately affected by climate change and related mitigation initiatives, including REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation). This study critically examines the protection of Indigenous peoples’ rights in REDD+ application across Southeast Asia, with particular attention to disparities in legal recognition, stakeholder engagement, and the application of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC). Employing a doctrinal legal research methodology, the analysis draws on primary sources—such as international treaties, national constitutions, statutory regulations, and REDD+ strategies—and secondary sources, including UN and FAO reports, to evaluate both legal frameworks and practical safeguards. The findings indicate that while some countries (e.g., Indonesia, the Philippines, Cambodia, and Myanmar) formally recognize Indigenous peoples, participation mechanisms and FPIC enforcement remain limited; others (e.g., Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Laos) lack explicit recognition, leaving significant gaps in rights protection. The study concludes that effective REDD+ application requires harmonized treaty interactions, strengthened domestic safeguards, and the integration of Indigenous worldviews into policymaking. It recommends inclusive, rights-based approaches that position Indigenous communities as active partners, promoting both ecological sustainability and social justice.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 112 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Ali MasyharAffiliation unknown6
Wildan Azkal FikriAffiliation unknown5
Dede IndraswaraAffiliation unknown4
Ridwan ArifinAffiliation unknown4
Anis WidyawatiAffiliation unknown3
Ratih DamayantiAffiliation unknown3
Irma CahyaningtyasAffiliation unknown3
Nadhira Madania DimartiAffiliation unknown2
Rasdi RasdiAffiliation unknown2
Adrian HadiputraAffiliation unknown2
Ikram AmrullahAffiliation unknown2
Hibatullah MaajidAffiliation unknown2
Rodiyah RodiyahAffiliation unknown2
Putri Balqis Nuril HakimAffiliation unknown2
Ahmad Gelora MahardikaAffiliation unknown2
PujiyonoAffiliation unknown2
Diandra Preludio RamadaAffiliation unknown2
Firsta Rahadatul 'AisyAffiliation unknown2
Mulyo WidodoAffiliation unknown2
Siti MursidahAffiliation unknown2
‪Eram Tunggul Pawenang‬State University of Semarang1
Muhammad AzamAffiliation unknown1
Yustina Dhian NovitaAffiliation unknown1
Muhamad Helmi Md SaidAffiliation unknown1
Sonny Saptoajie WicaksonoAffiliation unknown1
Indung WijayantoState University of Semarang1
Dedeng DedengInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Muhammad SyaifuddinAffiliation unknown1
Akhmad IdrisAffiliation unknown1
Mahcmod Zakaria Al FansorieAffiliation unknown1
Angga AnggaAffiliation unknown1
Calvin CameronAffiliation unknown1
Cahya WulandariState University of Semarang1
Aisyah Nur RafidahAffiliation unknown1
Kukuh Satria WiratamaAffiliation unknown1
Shofriya Qanitatin AbidahAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ildisea/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">REDD+ Application in Southeast Asia: Legal Challenges and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in Climate Change Mitigation</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nugraha, Adrian</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Emirzon, Joni </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Maskur, Muhammad Azil </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Lihtorng Chen, Robert</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Indigenous peoples, whose cultural and ecological connections to forests are profound, are disproportionately affected by climate change and related mitigation initiatives, including REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation). This study critically examines the protection of Indigenous peoples’ rights in REDD+ application across Southeast Asia, with particular attention to disparities in legal recognition, stakeholder engagement, and the application of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC). Employing a doctrinal legal research methodology, the analysis draws on primary sources—such as international treaties, national constitutions, statutory regulations, and REDD+ strategies—and secondary sources, including UN and FAO reports, to evaluate both legal frameworks and practical safeguards. The findings indicate that while some countries (e.g., Indonesia, the Philippines, Cambodia, and Myanmar) formally recognize Indigenous peoples, participation mechanisms and FPIC enforcement remain limited; others (e.g., Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Laos) lack explicit recognition, leaving significant gaps in rights protection. The study concludes that effective REDD+ application requires harmonized treaty interactions, strengthened domestic safeguards, and the integration of Indigenous worldviews into policymaking. It recommends inclusive, rights-based approaches that position Indigenous communities as active partners, promoting both ecological sustainability and social justice.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-06-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ildisea/article/view/36056</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ildisea.v5i1.36056</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): January-June 2026; 1-43</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2829-9655</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2830-0297</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ildisea.v5i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ildisea/article/view/36056/10131</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Adrian Nugraha, Joni Emirzon, Muhammad Azil Maskur, Robert Lihtorng Chen (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>