Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Electoral Democracy, Oligarchic Continuity: Why Political Change Does Not Always Mean Structural Reform in Indonesia

Indonesia Discourse · Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026)

DOI
10.15294/indi.v3i2.65512
ISSN
3124-5684
Published
2026-07-16
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

Indonesia’s democratic institutions have enabled regular electoral competition and peaceful transfers of executive power, yet questions remain about the extent to which electoral change transforms the underlying distribution of political and economic influence. The persistence of elite networks, concentrated resources, and patronage relationships provides a basis for examining the relationship between democratic procedures and substantive political reform. This study proposes to investigate how elite continuity operates within Indonesia’s post-Reformasi political system and how it shapes opportunities for institutional change. Drawing on theories of political oligarchy, elite reproduction, and democratic accountability, the research would employ qualitative process tracing and critical analysis of selected policy episodes. Sources would include legislative records, party documents, campaign-finance disclosures where available, public statements, and relevant investigative reporting and scholarly literature. The analysis would examine relationships among political financing, elite networks, policy bargaining, and the distribution of influence over selected public decisions. Rather than assuming that all policy continuity reflects oligarchic control, the study would distinguish between institutional constraints, legitimate policy preferences, and demonstrable mechanisms of elite influence. This distinction is essential for developing empirically defensible explanations of democratic persistence and reform limitations. The research aims to contribute to comparative debates on democratic consolidation in emerging economies by examining how formal electoral competition interacts with informal power structures. Its broader implications concern political transparency, party institutionalization, campaign-finance regulation, and mechanisms for strengthening substantive democratic accountability in Indonesia.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 183 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Anis WidyawatiAffiliation unknown14
Rasdi RasdiAffiliation unknown14
Waspiah WaspiahAffiliation unknown14
Riska AlkadriAffiliation unknown11
Dian LatifianiAffiliation unknown10
Ngboawaji Daniel NteAffiliation unknown9
Rodiyah RodiyahAffiliation unknown9
Septhian Eka AdiyatmaAffiliation unknown9
Nadiyah Meyliana PutriAffiliation unknown8
Indah Sri UtariAffiliation unknown8
Ali MasyharAffiliation unknown7
Muhammad Iqbal BaiquniAffiliation unknown7
Nurul FibriantiAffiliation unknown7
Bayangsari WedhatamiAffiliation unknown7
R Benny RiyantoAffiliation unknown5
Asyaffa Ridzqi AmandhaAffiliation unknown5
Siti Hafsyah IdrisAffiliation unknown5
Riki JuliantoAffiliation unknown5
Muhammad Azil MaskurAffiliation unknown4
Sonny Saptoajie WicaksonoAffiliation unknown4
Karsinah KarsinahAffiliation unknown4
Bintang Rafli AnantaAffiliation unknown4
Zainurohmah ZainurohmahAffiliation unknown4
Fitria DamayantiAffiliation unknown4
Muhammad Wahyu Saiful HudaAffiliation unknown4
Ngaboawaji Daniel NteAffiliation unknown4
Souad EzzeroualiAffiliation unknown3
Ahsana NadiyyaAffiliation unknown3
Asmarani RamliAffiliation unknown3
Dewi Puspa SariAffiliation unknown3
Layla Putri AulyaAffiliation unknown3
Robert Brian SmithAffiliation unknown3
Raden Muhammad Arvy IlyasaAffiliation unknown3
Heni RosidaAffiliation unknown3
Umi AfiatunAffiliation unknown3

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/indi/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Electoral Democracy, Oligarchic Continuity: Why Political Change Does Not Always Mean Structural Reform in Indonesia</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Moch. Andry Wikra Wardhana, Mamonto</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Alejandro, Sergi Fernandez</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Arifin, Ridwan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Alzwae, Mashaallah Othman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nurlukman, Adie Dwiyanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Indonesia’s democratic institutions have enabled regular electoral competition and peaceful transfers of executive power, yet questions remain about the extent to which electoral change transforms the underlying distribution of political and economic influence. The persistence of elite networks, concentrated resources, and patronage relationships provides a basis for examining the relationship between democratic procedures and substantive political reform. This study proposes to investigate how elite continuity operates within Indonesia’s post-Reformasi political system and how it shapes opportunities for institutional change. Drawing on theories of political oligarchy, elite reproduction, and democratic accountability, the research would employ qualitative process tracing and critical analysis of selected policy episodes. Sources would include legislative records, party documents, campaign-finance disclosures where available, public statements, and relevant investigative reporting and scholarly literature. The analysis would examine relationships among political financing, elite networks, policy bargaining, and the distribution of influence over selected public decisions. Rather than assuming that all policy continuity reflects oligarchic control, the study would distinguish between institutional constraints, legitimate policy preferences, and demonstrable mechanisms of elite influence. This distinction is essential for developing empirically defensible explanations of democratic persistence and reform limitations. The research aims to contribute to comparative debates on democratic consolidation in emerging economies by examining how formal electoral competition interacts with informal power structures. Its broader implications concern political transparency, party institutionalization, campaign-finance regulation, and mechanisms for strengthening substantive democratic accountability in Indonesia.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-07-16</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/indi/article/view/65512</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/indi.v3i2.65512</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Indonesia Discourse; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): July-December, 2026</dc:source>
	<dc:source>3124-5684</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/indi.v3i2</dc:source>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Mamonto Moch. Andry Wikra Wardhana, Sergi Fernandez Alejandro, Ridwan Arifin, Mashaallah Othman Alzwae, Adie Dwiyanto Nurlukman (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>