Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Filsafat Pendidikan Pancasila dalam Kurikulum 2013 dan Kurikulum Merdeka: Analisis Komparatif Landasan Filosofis

Integralistik · Vol. 37 No. 1 (2026) · pp. 42–52

DOI
10.15294/integralistik.v37i1.34147
ISSN
2549-5011, 0853-7208
Published
2026-01-14
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Pancasila, as the state foundation and philosophical basis of national education mandated by the National Education System Law Article 2, should serve as an ontological, epistemological, and axiological foundation in every national curriculum. This study aims to analyze and compare the educational philosophy underlying two curriculums and assess the extent to which Pancasila’s educational philosophy is adopted as a philosophical basis. The method used comparative analysis of official curriculum documents, namely Permendikbud No. 57–59 of 2014 (2013 Curriculum) and Permendikbudristek No. 12 of 2024 and Permendikdasmen No. 13 of 2025 (Merdeka Curriculum). The analysis employed thematic content analysis across three dimensions: (1) Philosophical Foundation, (2) Integration of Pancasila, and (3) Philosophical Depth. Results show that the 2013 Curriculum is dominated by progressivism and essentialism philosophies, with partial and normative-moral integration of Pancasila limited to the first three principles. In contrast, the Merdeka Curriculum integrates Pancasila holistically across eight graduate profile dimensions, covering all principles and beginning to engage ontological, epistemological, and axiological levels through a deep learning approach. The Merdeka Curriculum aligns more closely with the idealistic philosophy of Pancasila education than the 2013 Curriculum. The findings imply a need for an explicit philosophical foundation in the curriculum and adequate teacher training so that Pancasila becomes a strong philosophical foundation rather than merely a normative message.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 106 co-authorship links · 6 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
  • National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Universitas PGRI Delta
  • Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi
  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Asnath Maria FuahAffiliation unknown1
Yuni Cahya EndrawatiAffiliation unknown1
Maria UlfahAffiliation unknown1
La Ode DzakirUniversitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka1
Muhammad Buttomi MasgodeUniversitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka1
Fathur Rahman RustanUniversitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka1
Al Tafakur LaodeUniversitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka1
Yudi MuhtadiAffiliation unknown1
Much Alvin AldiyaAffiliation unknown1
Makrina TindangenAffiliation unknown1
Evie PalenewenAffiliation unknown1
Ely YuliawanAffiliation unknown1
Ugi NugrahaAffiliation unknown1
Mohammad Noviani ArdiAffiliation unknown1
Muchamad Coirun NizarAffiliation unknown1
Tali TulabAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad BasirAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad AnwarUniversitas PGRI Delta1
Ahmad FadholiAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad AminUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Sahid BismantokoNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Sofwan HidayatNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Tri WidodoUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Djoko Wahyu KarmiadjiBadan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi1
M. RosyidiAffiliation unknown1
Harris ZaenalAffiliation unknown1
Nofriyadi NurdamAffiliation unknown1
Andi M. KadirAffiliation unknown1
Nurhadi PramanaAffiliation unknown1
Freddy K KalidjernihAffiliation unknown1
Muchtarom MuchtaromAffiliation unknown1
Erna YuliandariAffiliation unknown1
Triyanto TriyantoAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad JaparAffiliation unknown1
Dini Nur FadhillahAffiliation unknown1
Wichaya KominAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/integralistik/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Filsafat Pendidikan Pancasila dalam Kurikulum 2013 dan Kurikulum Merdeka: Analisis Komparatif Landasan Filosofis</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Winarno, Winarno</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Heri Santoso </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Yuyus Kardiman </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Muchtarom</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">educational philosophy; Pancasila; 2013 Curriculum; Merdeka Curriculum;philosophical foundation.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Pancasila, as the state foundation and philosophical basis of national education mandated by the National Education System Law Article 2, should serve as an ontological, epistemological, and axiological foundation in every national curriculum. This study aims to analyze and compare the educational philosophy underlying two curriculums and assess the extent to which Pancasila’s educational philosophy is adopted as a philosophical basis. The method used comparative analysis of official curriculum documents, namely Permendikbud No. 57–59 of 2014 (2013 Curriculum) and Permendikbudristek No. 12 of 2024 and Permendikdasmen No. 13 of 2025 (Merdeka Curriculum). The analysis employed thematic content analysis across three dimensions: (1) Philosophical Foundation, (2) Integration of Pancasila, and (3) Philosophical Depth. Results show that the 2013 Curriculum is dominated by progressivism and essentialism philosophies, with partial and normative-moral integration of Pancasila limited to the first three principles. In contrast, the Merdeka Curriculum integrates Pancasila holistically across eight graduate profile dimensions, covering all principles and beginning to engage ontological, epistemological, and axiological levels through a deep learning approach. The Merdeka Curriculum aligns more closely with the idealistic philosophy of Pancasila education than the 2013 Curriculum. The findings imply a need for an explicit philosophical foundation in the curriculum and adequate teacher training so that Pancasila becomes a strong philosophical foundation rather than merely a normative message.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-01-14</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/integralistik/article/view/34147</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/integralistik.v37i1.34147</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Integralistik; Vol. 37 No. 1 (2026): January 2026; 42-52</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-5011</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0853-7208</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/integralistik.v37i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/integralistik/article/view/34147/8072</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Integralistik</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>