Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

E-Court Paradigm Shift: Problems of Legitimacy Mechanisms of Electronic Evidence in State Administrative Procedure Law

Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) · Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025) · pp. 53–74

DOI
10.15294/islrev.v6i1.23143
ISSN
2654-8763, 2654-3125
Published
2025-04-07
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

This study on the legitimacy mechanisms of electronic evidence within the State Administrative Procedure Law is intrinsically connected to Indonesia’s ongoing efforts to modernize its legal landscape. The acknowledgment of electronic information and documents as valid evidence aligns with Indonesia’s commitment to adapting its legal framework to the digital era. The legal issues explored within the context of the E-Court paradigm shift resonate with Indonesia's broader initiatives to enhance judicial efficiency and access to justice. As Indonesia grapples with the challenges of incorporating electronic evidence within its administrative procedures, the study sheds light on the specific hurdles faced within the Indonesian legal system. Regulatory complexities and resource constraints resonate with Indonesia’s broader struggle to harmonize its legal infrastructure with the demands of the digital age. Moreover, the study emphasizes the importance of a proportionate mechanism in addressing legitimacy concerns, aligning with Indonesia’s commitment to fostering a fair and balanced legal environment. The conclusion highlighting the critical role of the validation process reflects Indonesia’s dedication to ensuring the integrity and reliability of electronic evidence within the legal proceedings.

Collaboration network of the authors

19 authors · 32 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Ridwan ArifinAffiliation unknown2
Riska AlkadriAffiliation unknown2
Dewi Puspa SariAffiliation unknown2
Lilies ResthiningsihAffiliation unknown2
Rohmat RohmatAffiliation unknown2
Doni YantoAffiliation unknown2
Muhammad Fahmi RamadaniAffiliation unknown1
Yetniwati YetniwatiAffiliation unknown1
Muskibah MuskibahAffiliation unknown1
Sasmiar SasmiarAffiliation unknown1
Zulfa 'Azzah FadhilikaAffiliation unknown1
Iqbal SyarifudinAffiliation unknown1
Iqbal SyariefuddinAffiliation unknown1
Fira Saputri Yanuar AndriAffiliation unknown1
Aditya WicaksonoAffiliation unknown1
Amelia Putri RizkytaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/islrev/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">E-Court Paradigm Shift: Problems of Legitimacy Mechanisms of Electronic Evidence in State Administrative Procedure Law</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hafizh Daffa Setiawan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Mohammed Erhuma</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Amarru Muftie Holish</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study on the legitimacy mechanisms of electronic evidence within the State Administrative Procedure Law is intrinsically connected to Indonesia’s ongoing efforts to modernize its legal landscape. The acknowledgment of electronic information and documents as valid evidence aligns with Indonesia’s commitment to adapting its legal framework to the digital era. The legal issues explored within the context of the E-Court paradigm shift resonate with Indonesia's broader initiatives to enhance judicial efficiency and access to justice. As Indonesia grapples with the challenges of incorporating electronic evidence within its administrative procedures, the study sheds light on the specific hurdles faced within the Indonesian legal system. Regulatory complexities and resource constraints resonate with Indonesia’s broader struggle to harmonize its legal infrastructure with the demands of the digital age. Moreover, the study emphasizes the importance of a proportionate mechanism in addressing legitimacy concerns, aligning with Indonesia’s commitment to fostering a fair and balanced legal environment. The conclusion highlighting the critical role of the validation process reflects Indonesia’s dedication to ensuring the integrity and reliability of electronic evidence within the legal proceedings.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-04-07</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/islrev/article/view/23143</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/islrev.v6i1.23143</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev); Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Indonesian State Law Review, 2023; 53-74</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2654-8763</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2654-3125</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/islrev.v6i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/islrev/article/view/23143/3535</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>