Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal SINTA 1

A Structural Model of Risk Governance and Maturity in Ultra Microfinance SOEs

International Journal of Cyber and IT Service Management · Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)

DOI
10.34306/ijcitsm.v5i2.200
ISSN
2808-554X, 2797-1325
Published
2025-09-09
Publisher
Pandawan Sejahtera Indonesia
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

The Indonesian government has set a target for State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) to achieve a risk management maturity level of 4.2 out of 5 by 2024. This objective is especially crucial following the consolidation of BRI, Pegadaian, and PNM into the Ultra Micro SOEs Holding. The integration process introduces new risks that require robust governance and control mechanisms. This study investigates how key risk management components namely governance, frameworks, processes, and internal controls contribute to strengthening risk management maturity in the Ultra Micro holding structure. Using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM), the research explores complex interrelations among these elements based on survey data from 644 respondents across the three SOEs. The findings confirm that most variables significantly influence one another and collectively support a sound model for maturity enhancement. However, the study also uncovers two statistically insignificant relationships: between the framework and the process, and between the process and overall maturity. These anomalies indicate the potential presence of mediating variables or implementation gaps that reduce the practical effectiveness of formal structures. The study concludes that a strong foundation in governance and internal control can meaningfully support risk maturity, but effective process execution may require further contextual and operational alignment. These results offer strategic insights for improving risk practices in SOEs and emphasize the need for future research to investigate hidden dynamics that may affect risk maturity outcomes.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

26 authors · 54 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • IPB University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Ujang SumarwanIPB University2
Arif Imam SurosoIPB University1
Trukan Sri BahukelingAffiliation unknown1
Agus BuonoAffiliation unknown1
Lilik Noor YuliatiIPB University1
Elke AlexandrinaAffiliation unknown1
Alfri AdiwijayaAffiliation unknown1
Muchlisina MadaniAffiliation unknown1
SyahidunAffiliation unknown1
Yasir Mustafa KareemAffiliation unknown1
Putri PuspitasariAffiliation unknown1
Harianto HariantoAffiliation unknown1
Noer Azam AchsaniAffiliation unknown1
Dina Nurul FitriaAffiliation unknown1
Toni BakhtiarAffiliation unknown1
Siti JahrohAffiliation unknown1
Kristio RapiAffiliation unknown1
Sri MulatsihAffiliation unknown1
Bayu Agung PrasetyoAffiliation unknown1
Galeh Nur Indriatno Putra PratamaAffiliation unknown1
Devi IstiyaningrumAffiliation unknown1
Arry EkanantaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://iiast.iaic-publisher.org/ijcitsm/index.php/IJCITSM/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">A Structural Model of Risk Governance and Maturity in Ultra Microfinance SOEs</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Susetyono, Eko</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Priyarsono, Dominicus Savio</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sukmawati, Anggraini</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nurhayati, Popong</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Integration</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Risk Management Maturity</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">SOEs Holding</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Ultra Micro</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">SEM</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The Indonesian government has set a target for State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) to achieve a risk management maturity level of 4.2 out of 5 by 2024. This objective is especially crucial following the consolidation of BRI, Pegadaian, and PNM into the Ultra Micro SOEs Holding. The integration process introduces new risks that require robust governance and control mechanisms. This study investigates how key risk management components namely governance, frameworks, processes, and internal controls contribute to strengthening risk management maturity in the Ultra Micro holding structure. Using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM), the research explores complex interrelations among these elements based on survey data from 644 respondents across the three SOEs. The findings confirm that most variables significantly influence one another and collectively support a sound model for maturity enhancement. However, the study also uncovers two statistically insignificant relationships: between the framework and the process, and between the process and overall maturity. These anomalies indicate the potential presence of mediating variables or implementation gaps that reduce the practical effectiveness of formal structures. The study concludes that a strong foundation in governance and internal control can meaningfully support risk maturity, but effective process execution may require further contextual and operational alignment. These results offer strategic insights for improving risk practices in SOEs and emphasize the need for future research to investigate hidden dynamics that may affect risk maturity outcomes.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Pandawan Sejahtera Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-09-09</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://iiast.iaic-publisher.org/ijcitsm/IJCITSM/article/view/200</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.34306/ijcitsm.v5i2.200</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">International Journal of Cyber and IT Service Management; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): October; 156−170</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2808-554X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2797-1325</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.34306/ijcitsm.v5i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://iiast.iaic-publisher.org/ijcitsm/IJCITSM/article/view/200/133</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Eko Susetyono, Dominicus Savio Priyarsono, Anggraini Sukmawati, Popong Nurhayati</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>