Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal SINTA 1

WhatsApp, Viber and Telegram which is Best for Instant Messaging?

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 6 No. 3 (2016)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v6i3.pp909-914
ISSN
2088-8708, 2088-8708
Published
2016-06-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstract

There are many free instant messengers available now which allow to communicate with friends with text, phone call, video, sharing of files, in group or not and keep contact with them even internationally. But only very few of the instant messengers have gained a popularity and attention. Recent studies have shown that the most popular instant messengers are WhatsApp, Viber and Telegram. Even, Facebook acquired WhatsApp due to have huge users. Viber is another messenger with many integrated features that allows the phone calls and sends the text messages for free and there is no subscription like WhatsApp. While Telegram offers the users an open-source platform with no ads, a clean fast interface, asks for no payments whatsoever and the biggest selling point is security. WhatsApp, Viber and Telegram which instant messenger is best? The popularity of Telegram has reached at the top of Google play store and become the most downloaded messaging app in the world today. But at the moment WhatsApp is still the winner!

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 104 co-authorship links · 43 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • University of Technology Malaysia
  • Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
  • Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Diponegoro University
  • Islamic Azad University, Tehran
  • Universiti Malaysia Perlis
  • Universitas Dinamika Bangsa
  • Other organisations
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Auzani JidinUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka34
Nik Rumzi Nik IdrisUniversity of Technology Malaysia18
Mohammad JannatiUniversity of Technology Malaysia16
Rahmat BudiartoAl Baha University16
Mohd Hatta JopriUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka15
Awang JusohUniversity of Technology Malaysia15
Nik Rumzi Nik IdrisAffiliation unknown14
Mohd Junaidi Abdul AzizUniversity of Technology Malaysia10
Mustafa ManapUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka10
Kee Jiar YeoUniversity of Technology Malaysia10
Kasrul Abdul KarimAffiliation unknown9
Mochammad FactaDiponegoro University9
Mohamed SalemUniversiti Sains Malaysia8
Mahmoud ZadehbagheriIslamic Azad University, Tehran8
Watra ArsadiandoAffiliation unknown7
Abdul Rahim AbdullahUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka6
Shih-Hui LeeUniversity of Technology Malaysia6
Shahreen KasimAffiliation unknown6
Mohammad Javad KianiIslamic Azad University, Tehran5
Mohd. Yazid IdrisAffiliation unknown5
Mohammad Faridun Naim TajuddinUniversiti Malaysia Perlis5
Mohd Junaidi Abdul AzizAffiliation unknown5
Hendril Satrian PurnamaAffiliation unknown5
Anggit PamungkasAffiliation unknown5
M. Rahimi YusoffUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka4
Muhammad AdoUniversity of Technology Malaysia4
Vahdat NazerianUniversity of Mazandaran4
Muhammad Zaid AihsanUniversiti Malaysia Perlis4
Chibuike Peter OhanuUniversity of Nigeria4
Tri WahonoAffiliation unknown4
Kurniabudi KurniabudiUniversitas Dinamika Bangsa4
Sharipuddin SharipuddinUniversitas Dinamika Bangsa4
Benni PurnamaAffiliation unknown4
Rahim IldarabadiAffiliation unknown4
Yeo Kee JiarAffiliation unknown4

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Oct 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>WhatsApp, Viber and Telegram which is Best for Instant Messaging?</dc:title><dc:creator>Sutikno, Tole</dc:creator><dc:creator>Handayani, Lina</dc:creator><dc:creator>Stiawan, Deris</dc:creator><dc:creator>Riyadi, Munawar Agus</dc:creator><dc:creator>Much Ibnu Subroto, Imam</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;There are many free instant messengers available now which allow to communicate with friends with text, phone call, video, sharing of files, in group or not and keep contact with them even internationally. But only very few of the instant messengers have gained a popularity and attention. Recent studies have shown that the most popular instant messengers are WhatsApp, Viber and Telegram. Even, Facebook acquired WhatsApp due to have huge users. Viber is another messenger with many integrated features that allows the phone calls and sends the text messages for free and there is no subscription like WhatsApp. While Telegram offers the users an open-source platform with no ads, a clean fast interface, asks for no payments whatsoever and the biggest selling point is security. WhatsApp, Viber and Telegram which instant messenger is best? The popularity of Telegram has reached at the top of Google play store and become the most downloaded messaging app in the world today. But at the moment WhatsApp is still the winner!&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2016-06-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v6i3.pp909-914</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v6i3.pp909-914</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 6 No 3 (2016); 909</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>http://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/443/328</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>