Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN KINERJA GURU MENGGUNAKAN PENILAIAN DIRI, TEMAN SEJAWAT, DAN PENILAIAN OLEH SISWA

Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation · Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017) · pp. 32–40

DOI
10.15294/jrer.v5i1.14878
ISSN
2503-1732, 2252-6420
Published
2017-06-08
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan instrumen penilaian kinerja guru SMK dan panduan penilaian kinerja guru SMK. Model penelitian menggunakan pengembangan dengan 9 langkah pengembangan dan metode penelitian mix method. Pengumpulan data melalui wawancara dan lembar observasi analisis berupa triangulasi. Alat pengumpulan data metode kuantitatif menggunakan validasi melalui 3 Expert Judgment dianalisis menggunakan formula Aiken, analisis instrumen penilaian kinerja guru SMK menggunakan validitas konstruk Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), reliabilitas instrumen dianalisis menggunakan Alpha Cronbach, dan uji kepraktisan menggunakan uji kuantitatif sederhana. Hasil validitas instrumen Expert Judgment menunjukkan validitas ≥ 0,30 bahwa seluruh butir item valid. Reliabilitas instrumen antar-rater menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan. Hasil KMO pada uji coba pertama 0,628- 0,668 terdapat satu item yang memiliki nilai KMO ≤ 0,5. setelah direvisi hasil KMO pada uji coba kedua 0.658-0.732. Berdasarkan muatan faktor terdapat 33 item yang memiliki nilai ≥ 0,5, maka dikatakan keseluruhan item valid. Reliabilitas pada uji coba pertama yaitu 0,863-0.871, nilai reliabilitas pada uji coba kedua 0,864-0,872. Pengembangan buku pedoman penilaian kinerja guru SMK yang diperuntukkan untuk guru SMK dan siswa SMK. Kesimpulan bahwa instrumen penilaian kinerja guru SMK memiliki validitas dan reliabilitas yang baik sehingga dapat digunakan sebagai instrumen penilaian kinerja guru SMK. This research is to develop a vocational teacher performance assessment instruments and guidelines vocational teacher performance. The research model using development with 9 steps of development and research methods mix method. Collecting data through interviews and observation form with triangulation analysis. Data collection tool uses a quantitative method with validation 3 Expert Judgment analyzed using formula Aiken, analyzed instruments vocational teacher performance using the construct validity Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), the reliability of instrument were analyzed using Cronbach Alpha and test the practicality using a simple quantitative test. The results of the validity instruments of Expert Judgment is of ≥ 0.30, that whole grain items is valid. Inter-rater reliability of the instrument showed there was no significant difference. The results of the first trial KMO 0,628- 0.668, there is one item with a value of KMO ≤ 0.5. After the revised of the second trial KMO 0658-0732. Based on the factor loadings are 33 items which have a value of ≥ 0.5, then the whole item is valid. Reliability in the first trial is 0.863 to 0871, the value of reliability the second trial from.864 to.872. Development handbook vocational teacher performance for vocational teachers and vocational students. The conclusion that the vocational teacher performance assessment instruments have good validity and reliability so it can be used as a vocational teacher performance assessment instruments.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 73 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
  • University of Indonesia
  • University of Science and Technology Beijing
  • Riau University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Haryono HaryonoUniversitas Bhayangkara Surabaya4
Wahyu HardyantoAffiliation unknown3
Siti NurrohmahUniversity of Indonesia2
Muhammad KhumaediAffiliation unknown2
Tri Joko RaharjoAffiliation unknown2
Enggar EstiwiAffiliation unknown2
Anan NugrohoState University of Semarang1
Budi SunarkoState University of Semarang1
Anggraini MulwindaState University of Semarang1
Anas FauziState University of Semarang1
Dwi OktaviyantiState University of Semarang1
Dina Wulung SavitriState University of Semarang1
Eliv KurniawanState University of Semarang1
Djoko Adi WidodoAffiliation unknown1
Dania Ayu WulandariState University of Semarang1
Agus SuryantoState University of Semarang1
Agus MurnomoState University of Semarang1
Amat BasirAffiliation unknown1
Nur Laely FatimahAffiliation unknown1
Dharu WihartasihAffiliation unknown1
Alfian BudiarsoAffiliation unknown1
Hilal Aji WibowoAffiliation unknown1
Any Ulfatus Sa’adahAffiliation unknown1
Latifa Rifatul WafaAffiliation unknown1
Niken SubositiAffiliation unknown1
Charisah Fitriana PutriAffiliation unknown1
Nurul HidayahAffiliation unknown1
Ravika Setyo AmantikaAffiliation unknown1
Fauziyah FauziyahUniversity of Science and Technology Beijing1
Wulansari Agus HaerudinAffiliation unknown1
Kartini KartiniRiau University1
Urip WahyuningsihAffiliation unknown1
Yesica Stefany SimanungkalitAffiliation unknown1
Puji AstutiAffiliation unknown1
Widya -Affiliation unknown1
Muizzah Atvi NurmaliaAffiliation unknown1
Bambang EndroyoAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN KINERJA GURU MENGGUNAKAN PENILAIAN DIRI, TEMAN SEJAWAT, DAN PENILAIAN OLEH SISWA</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Firyomanto, Firyomanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wibawanto, Hari</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Syamwil, Rodia</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan instrumen penilaian kinerja guru SMK dan panduan&amp;nbsp; penilaian kinerja guru SMK. Model penelitian menggunakan pengembangan dengan 9 langkah pengembangan dan&amp;nbsp; metode penelitian mix method. Pengumpulan data melalui wawancara dan lembar observasi analisis&amp;nbsp; berupa triangulasi. Alat pengumpulan data metode kuantitatif menggunakan validasi melalui 3 Expert Judgment dianalisis menggunakan formula Aiken, analisis instrumen penilaian kinerja guru SMK menggunakan validitas konstruk Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), reliabilitas instrumen dianalisis menggunakan Alpha Cronbach, dan uji kepraktisan menggunakan uji kuantitatif sederhana. Hasil validitas instrumen Expert Judgment menunjukkan validitas ≥ 0,30 bahwa seluruh butir item valid. Reliabilitas instrumen antar-rater menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan. Hasil KMO pada uji coba pertama&amp;nbsp; 0,628- 0,668 terdapat satu item yang memiliki nilai KMO ≤ 0,5. setelah direvisi hasil KMO pada uji coba kedua 0.658-0.732. Berdasarkan muatan faktor terdapat 33 item yang memiliki nilai ≥ 0,5, maka dikatakan keseluruhan item valid. Reliabilitas pada uji coba pertama yaitu&amp;nbsp; 0,863-0.871, nilai reliabilitas pada uji coba kedua 0,864-0,872. Pengembangan buku pedoman penilaian kinerja guru SMK yang diperuntukkan untuk guru SMK dan siswa SMK. Kesimpulan bahwa instrumen penilaian kinerja guru SMK memiliki validitas dan reliabilitas yang baik sehingga dapat digunakan sebagai instrumen penilaian kinerja guru SMK.
This research is to develop a vocational teacher performance assessment instruments and guidelines&amp;nbsp; vocational teacher performance. The research model using development with 9 steps of development and research methods mix method. Collecting data through interviews and observation form with triangulation analysis. Data collection tool uses a quantitative method with validation 3 Expert Judgment analyzed using formula Aiken, analyzed &amp;nbsp;instruments vocational teacher performance using the construct validity Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), the reliability of&amp;nbsp; instrument were analyzed using Cronbach Alpha and test the practicality using a simple quantitative test. The results of the validity instruments of Expert Judgment is of ≥ 0.30, that whole grain items is valid. Inter-rater reliability of the instrument showed there was no significant difference. The results of the first trial KMO 0,628- 0.668, there is one item with a value of KMO ≤ 0.5. After the revised of the second trial KMO 0658-0732. Based on the factor loadings are 33 items which have a value of ≥ 0.5, then the whole item is valid. Reliability in the first trial is 0.863 to 0871, the value of reliability the second trial from .864 to .872. Development handbook vocational teacher performance for vocational teachers and vocational students. The conclusion that the vocational teacher performance assessment instruments have good validity and reliability so it can be used as a vocational teacher performance assessment instruments.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2017-06-08</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/14878</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jrer.v5i1.14878</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation; Vol 5 No 1 (2016); 32-40</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-1732</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6420</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jrer.v5i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/14878/8110</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>