Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Corrective Justice and Its Significance on the Private Law

Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies · Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022) · pp. 1–30

DOI
10.15294/jils.v7i1.46691
ISSN
2548-1592, 2548-1584
Published
2022-06-09
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

This article attempts to explore corrective justice and its significant role in private law. There are many justice perspective on private law, but corrective justice is part of the view that have significant role in the work of private law. Breaking the private property right charges someone to take responsibility. To what extent private law rules responsibility of the someone. Corrective justice can be meassurement to take responsibility. Corrective justice can be traced back to Aristotle's ideas of justice and Kant's ideas of rights. Hans Kelsen sharply criticized the concept of corrective justice for only proposing formal ideas without touching anything substantial. Apart from this criticism, corrective justice remains very important in private law studies because it provides solutions between two private actors in which one benefits from the losses experienced by the other. So far, the dispute settlement mechanism in private law gives the winning party a full share, while the loser does not receive any share at all. Corrective justice offers a quantitative measure that balances what the defendant is deducting and what is added to the claimant's loss. The application of this principle encourages the creation of equal punishment between the disputed parties.

Collaboration network of the authors

2 authors · 1 co-authorship link

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jils/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Corrective Justice and Its Significance on the Private Law</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Hage, Markus Y</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ningrum, Panggih Kusuma</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This article attempts to explore corrective justice and its significant role in private law. There are many justice perspective on private law, but corrective justice is part of the view that have significant role in the work of private law. Breaking the private property right charges someone to take responsibility. To what extent private law rules responsibility of the someone. Corrective justice can be meassurement to take responsibility. Corrective justice can be traced back to Aristotle's ideas of justice and Kant's ideas of rights. Hans Kelsen sharply criticized the concept of corrective justice for only proposing formal ideas without touching anything substantial. Apart from this criticism, corrective justice remains very important in private law studies because it provides solutions between two private actors in which one benefits from the losses experienced by the other. So far, the dispute settlement mechanism in private law gives the winning party a full share, while the loser does not receive any share at all. Corrective justice offers a quantitative measure that balances what the defendant is deducting and what is added to the claimant's loss. The application of this principle encourages the creation of equal punishment between the disputed parties.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-06-09</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jils/article/view/46691</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jils.v7i1.46691</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies; Vol 7 No 1 (2022): A Discourse of Justice and Legal Protection in Domestic and Global Perspective; 1-30</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-1592</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-1584</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jils.v7i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jils/article/view/46691/21746</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 Markus Y Hage, Panggih Kusuma Ningrum</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>