Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Position of the Victim in Criminal Acts Illegal Logging

Journal of Law and Legal Reform · Vol. 1 No. 3 (2020) · pp. 507–516

DOI
10.15294/jllr.v1i3.35957
ISSN
2715-0968, 2715-0941
Published
2020-04-30
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the position of victims in criminal acts of illegal logging, find juridical reasons to the extent that the state pays more attention to state losses as victims compared to the position of the community as victims in illegal logging. This research method uses a qualitative approach with normative juridical law design. Data collection techniques using library research. Data analysis techniques: (1) presentation, (2) data reduction, and (3) collection and verification. The results of the study: (1) The position of the victim in the case of illegal logging in the criminal justice system is still lacking due to the regulation of the law and the principles in the Criminal Procedure Code itself more prioritizing retribution as embezzlement, ie seeing how much loss arises due to the perpetrators criminal without seeing the position of the community as victims indirectly. Whereas in terms of justification or legal basis in which the government / state is more concerned with the state's loss than the community as a victim. There are principles in the Indonesian criminal procedure law which are strengthened by the Constitutional Court's decision in "MKRI ruling Number 3 / PUU-VIII / 2010" which argues that state control over the earth and water and the natural resources contained therein. This means that the state is given the freedom to regulate, make policies, manage and oversee the use of the earth and water and natural resources contained in it with a constitutional measure that is as much as possible the prosperity of the people and considers the rights of the people as victims only of an objective nature where the state takes policy with more attention to victims generally.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 125 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Cahya WulandariState University of Semarang7
Muhammad Azil MaskurAffiliation unknown6
Ridwan ArifinAffiliation unknown6
Anis WidyawatiAffiliation unknown4
‪Eram Tunggul Pawenang‬State University of Semarang3
Aprila NiravitaAffiliation unknown3
Ahmad Zaharuddin Sani Ahmad SabriAffiliation unknown3
Rohadhatul AisyAffiliation unknown3
Rodiyah RodiyahAffiliation unknown3
Nadhira Madania DimartiAffiliation unknown2
Rasdi RasdiAffiliation unknown2
Windiahsari WindiahsariAffiliation unknown2
Salsabila TriandaniAffiliation unknown2
Rizqan NaelufarAffiliation unknown2
Roziya AbuAffiliation unknown2
Syatriawan LaguraAffiliation unknown2
Nadela JusticeaAffiliation unknown2
Juniza Indah SetiawatiAffiliation unknown2
Moh SamanAffiliation unknown2
Muhammad Hilmi Naufal AflahAffiliation unknown2
Diyah Anggun FebriyantiAffiliation unknown2
Bayyinatun AfifahAffiliation unknown2
Ratih DamayantiState University of Semarang2
Ali MurtadhoAffiliation unknown2
Joko SusantoAffiliation unknown2
Rachmadan Eka CiptaAffiliation unknown2
Indah Sri UtariAffiliation unknown2
Muhammad AzamUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Fendi Setyo HarmokoAffiliation unknown1
Adib Nor FuadAffiliation unknown1
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Puji AstutiAffiliation unknown1
Zulfa SakhiyyaAffiliation unknown1
Heru SaputraAffiliation unknown1
Dolendra PaudelAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Haidar GhoniAffiliation unknown1
Hana HidayatuzzakiaAffiliation unknown1
Wahyudi WahyudiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jllr/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Position of the Victim in Criminal Acts Illegal Logging</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Obe, Redentor G A</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Masyhar, Ali</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The purpose of this study is to analyze the position of victims in criminal acts of illegal logging, find juridical reasons to the extent that the state pays more attention to state losses as victims compared to the position of the community as victims in illegal logging. This research method uses a qualitative approach with normative juridical law design. Data collection techniques using library research. Data analysis techniques: (1) presentation, (2) data reduction, and (3) collection and verification. The results of the study: (1) The position of the victim in the case of illegal logging in the criminal justice system is still lacking due to the regulation of the law and the principles in the Criminal Procedure Code itself more prioritizing retribution as embezzlement, ie seeing how much loss arises due to the perpetrators criminal without seeing the position of the community as victims indirectly. Whereas in terms of justification or legal basis in which the government / state is more concerned with the state's loss than the community as a victim. There are principles in the Indonesian criminal procedure law which are strengthened by the Constitutional Court's decision in "MKRI ruling Number 3 / PUU-VIII / 2010" which argues that state control over the earth and water and the natural resources contained therein. This means that the state is given the freedom to regulate, make policies, manage and oversee the use of the earth and water and natural resources contained in it with a constitutional measure that is as much as possible the prosperity of the people and considers the rights of the people as victims only of an objective nature where the state takes policy with more attention to victims generally.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-04-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jllr/article/view/35957</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jllr.v1i3.35957</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Law and Legal Reform; Vol 1 No 3 (2020): Law and Development in the Disruptive Era (Indonesia and Global Context); 507-516</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-0968</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-0941</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jllr/article/view/35957/15918</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>