Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Socioeconomic Participation, Access to Services, Quality of Life, and Social Inclusion Among People with Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Journal of Nonformal Education · Vol. 12 No. nformal (2026) · pp. 363–379

DOI
10.15294/jone.v12i2.58808
ISSN
2528-4541, 2442-532X
Published
2026-08-21
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

Background – The persistent exclusion of people with disabilities from social, economic, and health systems remains a critical global issue, driven by structural barriers, stigma, and unequal access to resources. Despite a growing number of intervention studies, evidence on their comparative effectiveness across contexts remains fragmented. Research Urgency – Existing disability interventions vary widely in design, implementation, and contextual adaptability, while systematic evidence on which models are most effective in improving inclusion outcomes is limited, particularly regarding how intervention types explain effect variability across studies. Research Objectives – This study systematically synthesizes the effectiveness of disability-related interventions in improving social participation, access to services, and inclusion outcomes, and examines the moderating role of intervention type in explaining between-study heterogeneity. Research Method – A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on 23 empirical studies. Random-effects and mixed-effects meta-regression models were applied to estimate pooled effect sizes and assess intervention type as a moderator of heterogeneity. Research Findings – The results indicate a significant overall positive effect of interventions on inclusion outcomes (estimate = 0.480; p < 0.001; 95% CI: 0.229–0.732). Heterogeneity was low to moderate (I² = 28.11%, Q = 39.221, p = 0.013). Moderator analysis revealed that intervention type significantly influenced effect size (QM = 19.817, p = 0.0002), with certain intervention categories demonstrating stronger effects. Evidence of potential publication bias was observed (Egger’s test p < 0.001), although results remained stable under sensitivity analysis. Research Conclusion – Disability-related interventions are generally effective in improving inclusion outcomes; however, their effectiveness depends significantly on the type of intervention implemented and contextual conditions. Research Novelty/Contribution – This study provides a comprehensive quantitative synthesis of disability inclusion interventions and advances the literature by identifying intervention type as a significant moderator of effectiveness, offering evidence-based guidance for policy design and inclusive development strategies.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 124 co-authorship links · 8 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Sebelas Maret University
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Universitas Mega Buana Palopo
  • Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo
  • Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Suminah SuminahSebelas Maret University5
Emi WidiyantiAffiliation unknown2
Agung WibowoSebelas Maret University2
Tri SuminarAffiliation unknown2
Sungkowo Edy MulyonoAffiliation unknown2
Titi PrihatinAffiliation unknown2
Seftia KusumawardaniAffiliation unknown2
Dwiningtyas PadmaningrumAffiliation unknown2
Imam ShofwanAffiliation unknown2
Jayanti Yusmah SariUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Nirsal NirsalUniversitas Cokroaminoto Palopo1
Suharsono BantunUniversitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka1
LM. Fid AksaraUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Muh YaminUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Joko WinarnoAffiliation unknown1
Distantya HanifaAffiliation unknown1
Joko WinarnoSebelas Maret University1
Distantya HanifaSebelas Maret University1
Putri PermatasariAffiliation unknown1
Umi HanifahSebelas Maret University1
Putri PermatasariSebelas Maret University1
Sugihardjo SugihardjoAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Ivan RizkiAffiliation unknown1
Sugihardjo SugihardjoSebelas Maret University1
Muhammad Ivan RizkiSebelas Maret University1
Muhammad Gilang Nur AlifAffiliation unknown1
Emi WidiyantiSebelas Maret University1
Muhammad Gilang Nur AlifSebelas Maret University1
Naufal Rastra ShubhiAffiliation unknown1
Naufal Rastra ShubhiSebelas Maret University1
Yudi SiswantoAffiliation unknown1
Diva Pramesti PutriAffiliation unknown1
Safira Arbella Aurell UrrofikAffiliation unknown1
Fadia Talia Salsabila HerviAffiliation unknown1
Ariyani WidyastutiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jone/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Socioeconomic Participation, Access to Services, Quality of Life, and Social Inclusion Among People with Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Malik, Abdul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sunardi, Sunardi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Suminah, Suminah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Saptaningtyas, Haryani</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Widhanarto , Ghanis Putra </dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">disability inclusion; meta-analysis; social participation; intervention effectiveness; mixed-effects model; systematic review</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Background – The persistent exclusion of people with disabilities from social, economic, and health systems remains a critical global issue, driven by structural barriers, stigma, and unequal access to resources. Despite a growing number of intervention studies, evidence on their comparative effectiveness across contexts remains fragmented.
Research Urgency – Existing disability interventions vary widely in design, implementation, and contextual adaptability, while systematic evidence on which models are most effective in improving inclusion outcomes is limited, particularly regarding how intervention types explain effect variability across studies.
Research Objectives – This study systematically synthesizes the effectiveness of disability-related interventions in improving social participation, access to services, and inclusion outcomes, and examines the moderating role of intervention type in explaining between-study heterogeneity.
Research Method – A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on 23 empirical studies. Random-effects and mixed-effects meta-regression models were applied to estimate pooled effect sizes and assess intervention type as a moderator of heterogeneity.
Research Findings – The results indicate a significant overall positive effect of interventions on inclusion outcomes (estimate = 0.480; p &amp;lt; 0.001; 95% CI: 0.229–0.732). Heterogeneity was low to moderate (I² = 28.11%, Q = 39.221, p = 0.013). Moderator analysis revealed that intervention type significantly influenced effect size (QM = 19.817, p = 0.0002), with certain intervention categories demonstrating stronger effects. Evidence of potential publication bias was observed (Egger’s test p &amp;lt; 0.001), although results remained stable under sensitivity analysis.
Research Conclusion – Disability-related interventions are generally effective in improving inclusion outcomes; however, their effectiveness depends significantly on the type of intervention implemented and contextual conditions.
Research Novelty/Contribution – This study provides a comprehensive quantitative synthesis of disability inclusion interventions and advances the literature by identifying intervention type as a significant moderator of effectiveness, offering evidence-based guidance for policy design and inclusive development strategies.
 </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-08-21</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jone/article/view/58808</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jone.v12i2.58808</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Journal of Nonformal Education; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): Community Education, Adult Education and Community Empowerment; 363-379</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2528-4541</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2442-532X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jone.v12i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jone/article/view/58808/11341</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Abdul Malik, Sunardi Sunardi, Suminah Suminah, Haryani Haryani, Ghanis Putra  Widhanarto  (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>