Journal
Keefektifan Model Osbron dan Cycle Learning dalam Pembelajaran Menganalisis Unsur-Unsur Cerita Pendek di Kelas XI
Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia · Vol. 10 No. 1 (2021) · pp. 61–68
- ISSN
- 2252-6722
- Published
- 2021-05-10
- Publisher
- Jurusan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni, Universitas Negeri Semarang
- Language
- eng
Abstract
Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui keefektifan pembelajaran menggunakan model Osbron dan Cycle Learning dalam pembelajaran menganalisis unsur-unsur pembangun cerita pendek, pada peserta didik kelas XI SMA. Metode penelitian kuantitatif dengan jenis eksperimen desain quasi experimental. Penelitian dilakukan di SMA Mas’Udiyyah Bandungan dengan sampel kelas XI IPS 1 kelas eksperimen 1 perlakuan model Osbron dan kelas XI IPS 2 kelas eksperimen 2 perlakuan model Cycle Learning. Hasil uji-t eksperimen 1 model Osbron menunjukkan hasil signifikansi 0,000 < 0,05 Ha diterima, pembelajaran menggunakan model Osbron efektif. Hasil uji-t eksperimen 2 model Cycle Learning menunjukkan hasil signifikansi 0,000 < 0,05 Ha diterima, pembelajaran menggunakan model Cycle Learning efektif. Hasil uji-t tes akhir model Osbron dan Cycle Learning diperoleh nilai signifikansi 0,004 sehingga nilai signifikansi < 0,05 terdapat perbedaan signifikan. Rata-rata nilai tes akhir model Osbron 83,25 dan model Cycle Learning87,25 ada selisih 4,75. Disimpulkan model Cycle Learning lebih efektif daripada model Osbron dalam pembelajaran menganalisis unsur-unsur pembangun cerita pendek di SMA. Kata kunci: cerita pendek; model osbron; model cycle learning ABSTRACT The research aims to determine the effectiveness of learning process using the Osbron and Cycle Learning in learning process to analyze the building elements of short story towards the class XI high scholl participants. Quantitative research method with quasi exsperimental design. The research was conducted in SMA Mas’Uddiyah Bandungan with sample class 2 with cycle learning model treatment. The result of t-test of the eksperimental model 1 Osbron showed significant result 0,000 < 0,05 Ha accepted, Learning process with method effective. The result of t-test the experiment model 2 Cycle Learning showed significant result 0,000 < 0,05 Ha accepted, learning process with cycle learning method effective. The t-test result of the Osbron model and Cycle Learning model t-test obtained a significance value of 0,004 so the significance value <0,05 there is a significant difference. Average of the final Osbron Scores 83,25 and Cycle Learning model 87,25 there is a difference 4,75. Conclude than the Cycle Learning model is more effective than the Osbron model im learning process to analyze the elements that build shot story in high school. Keywords: short story, osbron model, cycle learning model
Collaboration network of the authors
40 authors · 90 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected
Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.
- Affiliation unknown
- Different organisations
- Same organisation
- Affiliation unknown
- Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
| Co-author | Organisation | Joint articles |
|---|---|---|
| Teguh Supriyanto | Affiliation unknown | 7 |
| Agus Nuryatin | Affiliation unknown | 5 |
| Meina Febriani | Affiliation unknown | 5 |
| Azis Nugroho | Affiliation unknown | 3 |
| Haryadi Haryadi | Affiliation unknown | 2 |
| Dian Nuzulia Armariena | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Edward Harrington | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Hari Bakti Mardikantoro | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Esti Puji Lestari | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Sumartini Sumartini | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Niken Kusumaningtyas | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Qeis Karina Puspasari | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Fajar Dwi Cahyaningrum | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Nur Alifa | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Leo Fernando | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Muhammad Fatwa Mirfakh | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Erisa Septianingrum | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Muhamad Haryanto | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Dede Indra Wahyu Nugroho | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Alda Marsya Ayudia | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Rera Rizki Andika | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Faridah Eriyaningsih | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Wagiran Wagiran | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Arum Yuliya Lestari | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Adris Setiani | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Siti Maemunah | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| RM. Teguh Supriyanto | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Ghaisyah Dwi Mayandri | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Gista Salsabila Chaerani | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Subyantoro Subyantoro | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Eva Setiowati | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Ahmad Hasan Busro | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Mukh Doyin | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Martina Puspita Rakhmi | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Lusiana Agustina | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| RM. Teguh Supriyanto | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Finda Septina Munjariyati | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Tommi Yuniawan | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.