Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

An Analysis of Critical Thinking Ability of Elementary School Students Through Model Contextual Teaching and Learning on Social Learning

Journal of Primary Education · Vol. 8 No. 7 (2019) · pp. 24–31

ISSN
2502-4515, 2252-6404
Published
2019-09-02
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Critical thinking ability of students in learning social science has not been measured in the learning process. The purpose of this study tests the effectiveness of the model Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) toward the students’ critical thinking ability, describe the process of analysis of students’ critical thinking ability. This type of study was a mixed-method, with sequential explanatory design. Samples of this study were grade V Public Elementary School 01 Rajekwesi, Jepara and Public Elementary School 01 Datar, Jepara. The data collection was conducted by a test, interview, and documentation. Quantitative data analysis techniques using the test and qualitative data analysis techniques with the triangulation of the data in the form of tests, interview, and documentation. The results showed that CTL model learning effectively improved critical thinking ability. Result of the average different test of the independent table column sig test sample (2-tailed) of 0.00 ˂ 0.05, this means that H1 accepted, the average critical thinking ability of CTL class is better than the expository class. Classical completeness of test results of the CTL class 80.95% students achieve at grade expository minimum completeness criteria (MCC), and that is equal to 76%. Test results of the average increase of the critical thinking ability in the classroom CTL by 30.33 and the expository class of 17.76. The description of the critical thinking ability of students in the expository class that belong to the criteria of good were the indicators of reasons and inference, which included in the criteria of moderate were an indicator of focus, situation, clarity, and overview. Meanwhile, in the classroom with CTL that belong to the good criteria were indicators of reasons, inference, focus, situation, clarity, whereas the overview included in the criteria of moderate.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 112 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Tarumanagara University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Eko HandoyoAffiliation unknown4
Muh. SholehAffiliation unknown3
Hamdan Tri AtmajaAffiliation unknown3
Noviani Achmad PutriAffiliation unknown2
Andy SuryadiAffiliation unknown2
Wasino WasinoTarumanagara University2
Juhadi JuhadiAffiliation unknown2
Yusuf FalaqAffiliation unknown2
Eva BanowatiAffiliation unknown2
Rusdarti RusdartiAffiliation unknown1
Slamet SurosoAffiliation unknown1
Samsudi SamsudiAffiliation unknown1
Mohamad FadliAffiliation unknown1
Sri WardaniState University of Semarang1
Ratna Juwita Dian PrabawatiAffiliation unknown1
Ganda Febri KurniawanAffiliation unknown1
Ufi SaraswatiAffiliation unknown1
Exsan Ali SetyonugrohoAffiliation unknown1
Ali SodikinAffiliation unknown1
Ayun HaifaniAffiliation unknown1
Ibnu SodiqAffiliation unknown1
Tsabit Azinar AhmadAffiliation unknown1
Idha WinarsihAffiliation unknown1
Abdul MuntholibAffiliation unknown1
Siswati SiswatiAffiliation unknown1
Syaiful AminAffiliation unknown1
Meilatia KartikasariAffiliation unknown1
Bain BainAffiliation unknown1
Mohammad Syaiful BakhriAffiliation unknown1
Aniza Oktarina WulandariAffiliation unknown1
Anisatul ChasanahAffiliation unknown1
Sucihatiningsih Dian Wisika PrajantiState University of Semarang1
Yulina IsmiyantiAffiliation unknown1
Imam KusmaryonoAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Nur HudaAffiliation unknown1
Nugroho Trisnu BrataAffiliation unknown1
Irin Maulana BahtiarAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">An Analysis of Critical Thinking Ability of Elementary School Students Through Model Contextual Teaching and Learning on Social Learning</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Syah, Imam Ma`arif</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Suyahmo, Suyahmo</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Utomo, Cahyo Budi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Critical thinking ability of students in learning social science has not been measured in the learning process. The purpose of this study tests the effectiveness of the model Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) toward the students’ critical thinking ability, describe the process of analysis of students’ critical thinking ability. This type of study was a mixed-method, with sequential explanatory design. Samples of this study were grade V Public Elementary School 01 Rajekwesi, Jepara and Public Elementary School 01 Datar, Jepara. The data collection was conducted by a test, interview, and documentation. Quantitative data analysis techniques using the test and qualitative data analysis techniques with the triangulation of the data in the form of tests, interview, and documentation. The results showed that CTL model learning effectively improved critical thinking ability. Result of the average different test of the independent table column sig test sample (2-tailed) of 0.00 ˂ 0.05, this means that H1 accepted, the average critical thinking ability of CTL class is better than the expository class. Classical completeness of test results of the CTL class 80.95% students achieve at grade expository minimum completeness criteria (MCC), and that is equal to 76%. Test results of the average increase of the critical thinking ability in the classroom CTL by 30.33 and the expository class of 17.76. The description of the critical thinking ability of students in the expository class that belong to the criteria of good were the indicators of reasons and inference, which included in the criteria of moderate were an indicator of focus, situation, clarity, and overview. Meanwhile, in the classroom with CTL that belong to the good criteria were indicators of reasons, inference, focus, situation, clarity, whereas the overview included in the criteria of moderate.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-09-02</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/33826</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Primary Education; Vol 8 No 7 (2019): September 2019; 24-31</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4515</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6404</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/33826/14148</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Primary Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>