Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

The Influence of Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL) Based Learning and Students’ Motivation Levels on Physical Education Learning Outcomes at SMA Negeri 1 Sale Rembang

Journal of Physical Education and Sports · Vol. 15 No. 2 (2026) · pp. 16–26

DOI
10.15294/jpes.v15i2.36345
ISSN
2502-4477, 2252-648X
Published
2026-07-06
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Physical Education learning at the senior high school level faces challenges related to student ability heterogeneity and varying motivation levels, which often result in learning disparities. This study aimed to analyze the effects of Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL)-based learning methods and students' motivation levels on PJOK learning outcomes. A 2×2 factorial experimental design was employed with 140 tenth-grade students from SMA Negeri 1 Sale Rembang divided into four treatment groups. The research implemented two TaRL approaches: TaRL A utilizing peer tutoring strategy and TaRL B utilizing parallel learning strategy. Students were categorized into high motivation (n=72) and low motivation (n=68) groups based on motivation questionnaire scores. Two-way ANOVA analysis revealed a significant main effect of TaRL method on learning outcomes (F=5.098, p=0.026, η²=0.036), with TaRL A demonstrating superior performance (M=78.18) compared to TaRL B (M=74.86). More significantly, students' motivation level demonstrated a very large main effect (F=30.021, p=0.000, η²=0.181), with high-motivation students achieving substantially higher scores (M=80.91) than low-motivation students (M=71.97). No significant interaction was found between method and motivation (F=0.246, p=0.621). These findings indicate that both factors independently contribute to PJOK learning outcomes, with motivation being approximately five times more influential than teaching method. Schools should prioritize implementing peer tutoring-based differentiation while simultaneously enhancing student motivation through autonomy, competence, and relatedness support

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 130 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Dwi Gansar Santi WijayantiAffiliation unknown6
Agus PujiantoAffiliation unknown5
Wahyu Ragil KurniawanAffiliation unknown4
Adi SAffiliation unknown3
SulaimanAffiliation unknown3
Mugiyo HartonoAffiliation unknown3
Armayta Dwi TaditaAffiliation unknown2
Roas IrsyadaAffiliation unknown2
Moch Fahmi AbdulazizAffiliation unknown2
Hermawan Pamot RahardjoAffiliation unknown2
Endang Sri HananiAffiliation unknown2
Lulu April FaridaAffiliation unknown1
Aftina Nurul HusnaAffiliation unknown1
Silvia IndriyaniAffiliation unknown1
Dhoni Frizky Arya SahabAffiliation unknown1
Suminar SuminarAffiliation unknown1
Barata YudaAffiliation unknown1
Hasna Tri OktaviaAffiliation unknown1
Erfandy AryantaraAffiliation unknown1
Aisyah Adinda Az-ZahraAffiliation unknown1
Ema Agita YuliantiAffiliation unknown1
Bhayu BilliandriAffiliation unknown1
Ulya Sekar ArumdhaniAffiliation unknown1
Donny Wira Yudha KusumaAffiliation unknown1
Ridha Aulliyya Ainur RamadhaniAffiliation unknown1
Agus Widodo SuriptoAffiliation unknown1
Lukluil BadriyahAffiliation unknown1
Faizal Anwar Al MukharomAffiliation unknown1
Bambang PriyonoState University of Semarang1
Sahfa Hany RachmaAffiliation unknown1
Rachmad Irfan Nur MalikiAffiliation unknown1
Hijrah Maulidiah AfifahAffiliation unknown1
Drastiana Siwi MaheswariAffiliation unknown1
Shabrina Bilqiss NabillaAffiliation unknown1
Kiki Revalyn AmeliaAffiliation unknown1
Khafid MaulanaAffiliation unknown1
Dias Ayu AsmaraniAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jpes/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">The Influence of Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL) Based Learning and Students’ Motivation Levels on Physical Education Learning Outcomes at SMA Negeri 1 Sale Rembang</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Pangestu, Ardian Yoga</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Pamot, Hermawan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Setiawan, Ipang </dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Physical Education learning at the senior high school level faces challenges related to student ability heterogeneity and varying motivation levels, which often result in learning disparities. This study aimed to analyze the effects of Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL)-based learning methods and students' motivation levels on PJOK learning outcomes. A 2×2 factorial experimental design was employed with 140 tenth-grade students from SMA Negeri 1 Sale Rembang divided into four treatment groups. The research implemented two TaRL approaches: TaRL A utilizing peer tutoring strategy and TaRL B utilizing parallel learning strategy. Students were categorized into high motivation (n=72) and low motivation (n=68) groups based on motivation questionnaire scores. Two-way ANOVA analysis revealed a significant main effect of TaRL method on learning outcomes (F=5.098, p=0.026, η²=0.036), with TaRL A demonstrating superior performance (M=78.18) compared to TaRL B (M=74.86). More significantly, students' motivation level demonstrated a very large main effect (F=30.021, p=0.000, η²=0.181), with high-motivation students achieving substantially higher scores (M=80.91) than low-motivation students (M=71.97). No significant interaction was found between method and motivation (F=0.246, p=0.621). These findings indicate that both factors independently contribute to PJOK learning outcomes, with motivation being approximately five times more influential than teaching method. Schools should prioritize implementing peer tutoring-based differentiation while simultaneously enhancing student motivation through autonomy, competence, and relatedness support</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-07-06</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jpes/article/view/36345</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpes.v15i2.36345</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Journal of Physical Education and Sports; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2026): Juni 2026; 16-26</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4477</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-648X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpes.v15i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jpes/article/view/36345/10359</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Physical Education and Sports</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>