Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

PENGARUH METODE LATIHAN DAN KEMAMPUAN MOTOR EDUCABILITY TERHADAP HASIL LATIHAN TEKNIK DASAR SEPAKBOLA

Journal of Physical Education and Sports · Vol. 4 No. 2 (2015)

DOI
10.15294/jpes.v4i2.9888
ISSN
2502-4477, 2252-648X
Published
2015-11-01
Publisher
Study Program Education and Sports, Postgraduate Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui pengaruh metode latihan taktis dan teknis, perbedaan pengaruh kemampuan motor educability tinggi dan motor educability rendah dan interaksi metode latihan dan kemampuan motor educability terhadap hasil latihan teknik dasar sepakbola.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksperimen factorial 2x2. Populasi58 pemain SSB Camar Mas Jaya. Teknik pengambilan sampelPurposive Samplingsebanyak 40 pemain. Instrumen tes penelitian ini: 1) TesIowa-Brace. 2) Program latihan metode taktis dan teknis. 3) Tes teknik dasar sepakbola (passing-stopping, dribbling dan shooting). Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA 2X2signifikansi α = 0,05. Uji normalitas menggunakan uji Kolmogorov-Smirnov dan uji homogenitas menggunakan uji Lavene’s test. Hasil penelitian: 1) Pada metode latihan didapat nilai Fhitung= 11,935 > Ftabel 4,11. 2) Pada kemampuan motor educability didapat Fhitung = 12,804 > Ftabel4,11. 3) Interaksi antara metode latihan dan kemampuan motor educability didapat Fhitung = 3,939 Ftable 4,11. 2) In the motor abilities acquired educability Fcount = 12,804 > Ftable4,11. 3) The interaction practice and the ability of the motor educability obtained Fcount = 3.939 <Ftable 4.11. Conclusions: 1) There is the influence of tactical training methods and technical training methods. 2) There is difference in effect between motor and motor educability high. 3) There is no interaction between the practice and the ability of the motor educability. Coaches and sports coaches can use this method as alternative method of tactical training.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 116 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Soegiyanto -Affiliation unknown4
Setya RahayuAffiliation unknown4
Ipang SetiawanAffiliation unknown3
Soegiyanto KSAffiliation unknown3
Tandiyo RahayuAffiliation unknown3
Agung WahyudiAffiliation unknown2
Agus RaharjoAffiliation unknown2
NasukaAffiliation unknown2
Heny SetyawatiAffiliation unknown2
Taufiq HidayahAffiliation unknown2
Tri RustiadiAffiliation unknown2
lambang tegarAffiliation unknown1
Dwi Tiga PutriAffiliation unknown1
Ari Mukti PamungkasAffiliation unknown1
Utami HidayatiAffiliation unknown1
Adi SAffiliation unknown1
Aisyah Adinda Az-ZahraAffiliation unknown1
Agung SeptiyonoAffiliation unknown1
Martin SudarmonoAffiliation unknown1
Bhayu BilliandriAffiliation unknown1
Isna NafidaAffiliation unknown1
Devi TirtawiryaAffiliation unknown1
Rohendi RohidiAffiliation unknown1
Wahyu LestariAffiliation unknown1
Lalu Hasan AshariAffiliation unknown1
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang1
Deni Achmad AdibAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Ilham RamadhaniAffiliation unknown1
Afif Naufal NajibAffiliation unknown1
Agus RahardjoAffiliation unknown1
Hermawan Pamot RaharjoAffiliation unknown1
Eka AbdurrahmanAffiliation unknown1
Arizal Septian BaharsyahAffiliation unknown1
Furqon HidayatullahAffiliation unknown1
Pungki IndartoAffiliation unknown1
Rinaldi AdityaAffiliation unknown1
Imron Nugroho SaputroAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpes/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">PENGARUH METODE LATIHAN DAN KEMAMPUAN MOTOR EDUCABILITY TERHADAP HASIL LATIHAN TEKNIK DASAR SEPAKBOLA</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Dwi Candra, Radita</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>-, Sulaiman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Hidayah, Taufik</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui pengaruh metode latihan taktis dan teknis, perbedaan pengaruh kemampuan motor educability tinggi dan motor educability rendah dan interaksi metode latihan dan kemampuan motor educability terhadap hasil latihan teknik dasar sepakbola.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksperimen factorial 2x2. Populasi58 pemain SSB Camar Mas Jaya. Teknik pengambilan sampelPurposive Samplingsebanyak 40 pemain. Instrumen tes penelitian ini : 1) TesIowa-Brace. 2) Program latihan metode taktis dan teknis. 3) Tes teknik dasar sepakbola (passing-stopping, dribbling dan shooting). Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA 2X2signifikansi α = 0,05. Uji normalitas menggunakan uji Kolmogorov-Smirnov dan uji homogenitas menggunakan uji Lavene’s test. Hasil penelitian : 1) Pada metode latihan didapat nilai Fhitung= 11,935 &amp;gt; Ftabel 4,11. 2) Pada kemampuan motor educability didapat Fhitung = 12,804 &amp;gt; Ftabel4,11. 3) Interaksi antara metode latihan dan kemampuan motor educability didapat Fhitung = 3,939 &amp;lt; Ftabel 4,11. Simpulan : 1) Adapengaruh metode latihan taktis dan metode latihan teknis. 2) Ada perbedaan antara motor educability tinggi dan motor educability. 3) Tidak ada interaksi metode latihan dan kemampuan motor educability. Pelatih dan pembina olahraga dapat menggunakan metode latihan taktis sebagai metode alternatif. The purpose differences influence the technical and tactical training methods, the difference influence of motor educability high and low and the interaction the practice and the ability of the results of the exercise educability basic techniques of football.This study a 2x2 factorial design. The population 58 players SSB Camar Mas Jaya. The sampling purposive Sampling40 players. Instrument tests in this study : 1) Test Iowa-Brace. 2) The program tactical and technical methods. 3) Test the basic techniques of football. Data ANOVA 2X2 with α = 0.05. Test for normality the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and homogeneity Lavene's. The results: 1) In the exercise method gained valueFcount= 11,935 &amp;gt; Ftable 4,11. 2) In the motor abilities acquired educability Fcount = 12,804 &amp;gt; Ftable4,11. 3) The interaction practice and the ability of the motor educability obtained Fcount = 3.939 &amp;lt;Ftable 4.11. Conclusions: 1) There is the influence of tactical training methods and technical training methods. 2) There is difference in effect between motor and motor educability high. 3) There is no interaction between the practice and the ability of the motor educability. Coaches and sports coaches can use this method as alternative method of tactical training. </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Study Program Education and Sports, Postgraduate Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2015-11-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpes/article/view/9888</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpes.v4i2.9888</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Physical Education and Sports; Vol 4 No 2 (2015): November 2015</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4477</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-648X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpes.v4i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpes/article/view/9888/6328</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>