Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

PERBEDAAN EFEKTIVITAS METODE SET SYSTEM DAN COMPOUND SET TERHADAP PROGRAM HYPERTROPHY OTOT LENGAN MEMBER FITNESS PION GYM SEMARANG

Journal of Sport Science and Fitness · Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020) · pp. 6–12

DOI
10.15294/jssf.v6i1.40200
ISSN
2745-5718, 2252-6528
Published
2020-05-31
Publisher
Department of Sports Science, Faculty of Sports Science, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

AbstrakMetode latihan yang sering digunakan member pada program hypertrophy (penambahan massa otot)yaitu set system dan compound set. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis perbedaan efektivitas latihanbeban menggunakan metode set system dan compound set terhadap hypertrophy otot lengan memberfitness Pion Gym Semarang. Desain penelitian yaitu, true experimental design dengan metode pretest-post test control grup design. Populasi penelitian adalah seluruh member fitness Pion GymSemarang. Sampel berjumlah 20 member diambil dengan teknik purposive sampling. Kelompokeksperimen 1 diberi metode set system dan kelompok eksperimen 2 diberi metode compound set.Hasil penelitian rerata hypertrophy kelompok eksperimen 1 otot biceps 32,8±3,01, otot triceps33,7375±3,17, sedangkan rerata hypertrophy kelompok eksperimen 2 otot biceps 33,295±2,55, otottriceps 34,335±2,42. Hasil Uji-t data post test otot biceps nilai thitung = 2,21 > 2,10 dan otot tricepsthitung = 2,15 > 2,10 jadi terdapat perbedaan hasil hypertrophy otot lengan biceps dan triceps antarakelompok eksperimen 1 dan eksperimen 2 setelah diberikan treatment. Simpulan hasil penelitianadalah metode compound set lebih efektif meningkatkan hasil hypertrophy otot lengan, sehinggapelatih sebaiknya menerapkan metode compound set untuk meningkatkan hypertrophy otot lengan.Kata Kunci: Compound Set, Fitness, Hypertrophy, Set System AbstractExercise methods are often used member on the hypertrophy program that is set system and compound set. Thisstudy aims to analyze the differences in the effectiveness of weight training using set system method andcompound set method of arm muscle hypertrophy on Pion Gym Semarang member's. The research design istrue experimental design with pre test-post test control group design method. The research population is allmembers of Pion Gym fitness Semarang. Samples totaling 20 members were taken by purposive samplingtechnique. Experiment group 1 was given set system method and experiment group 2 was given compound setmethod. The results of research, average hypertrophy on experimental group 1 of the biceps muscle is 32,8 ±3,01, and the triceps muscle is 33,7375 ± 3,17, while average hypertrophy on experimental group 2 of thebiceps muscle is 33,295 ± 2,55, and the muscle triceps is 34.335 ± 2.42. The result of t-test of post test data,biceps muscle tct = 2,21> 2,10 and triceps tct = 2,15> 2,10 so there is any difference of hypertrophy result ofbiceps and triceps muscles between experiment group 1 and experiment 2 group after given treatments.Conclusion of the research is the compound set method is more effective in improving hypertrophy result of armmuscle, so the trainer should apply the compound set practice method to improve the arm muscle hypertrophy.Keywords: Compound Set, Fitness, Hypertrophy, Set System

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 141 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • National Cheng Kung University
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Tandiyo RahayuAffiliation unknown5
Tommy SoenyotoAffiliation unknown5
Setya RahayuAffiliation unknown4
Evi WidowatiAffiliation unknown3
Anik Setyo WahyuningsihState University of Semarang3
Soegiyanto SoegiyantoAffiliation unknown3
Donny Wira Yudha KusumaAffiliation unknown3
Herry KoesyantoAffiliation unknown2
Anies SetiowatiAffiliation unknown2
Taufiq HidayahAffiliation unknown2
Soekardi SoekardiAffiliation unknown2
Agung WahyudiAffiliation unknown2
Imam Santosa Ciptaning WahyuAffiliation unknown2
Musyafari WaluyoAffiliation unknown2
Hsu Yu-YunNational Cheng Kung University1
Fitri LailaAffiliation unknown1
‪Eram Tunggul Pawenang‬State University of Semarang1
Miana Ciputra HandariAffiliation unknown1
Mahfud AnwarAffiliation unknown1
Fitra Isna UtamiAffiliation unknown1
Eko HarjantoAffiliation unknown1
Gunawan GunawanUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Ariyatun AriyatunAffiliation unknown1
Sri SumartiningsihAffiliation unknown1
Maria Ayu PuspitaAffiliation unknown1
Anggit RisdiyantoAffiliation unknown1
Rakha AbbiyuAffiliation unknown1
Irfan FauziAffiliation unknown1
Safeb Achman Irfai AnasAffiliation unknown1
Wahyu Restu SyahputriAffiliation unknown1
Hari SetijonoAffiliation unknown1
Bambang Ferianto Tjahyo KuntjoroAffiliation unknown1
Niken Fatimah NurhayatiAffiliation unknown1
M. IrfanAffiliation unknown1
Awan HarionoAffiliation unknown1
Randes Rahdian AzizAffiliation unknown1
Sulaiman SulaimanAffiliation unknown1
Darlani DarlaniAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jssf/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">PERBEDAAN EFEKTIVITAS METODE SET SYSTEM DAN COMPOUND SET TERHADAP PROGRAM HYPERTROPHY OTOT LENGAN MEMBER FITNESS PION GYM SEMARANG</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Aprianto, Boby</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sugiharto, Sugiharto</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">AbstrakMetode latihan yang sering digunakan member pada program hypertrophy (penambahan massa otot)yaitu set system dan compound set. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis perbedaan efektivitas latihanbeban menggunakan metode set system dan compound set terhadap hypertrophy otot lengan memberfitness Pion Gym Semarang. Desain penelitian yaitu, true experimental design dengan metode pretest-post test control grup design. Populasi penelitian adalah seluruh member fitness Pion GymSemarang. Sampel berjumlah 20 member diambil dengan teknik purposive sampling. Kelompokeksperimen 1 diberi metode set system dan kelompok eksperimen 2 diberi metode compound set.Hasil penelitian rerata hypertrophy kelompok eksperimen 1 otot biceps 32,8±3,01, otot triceps33,7375±3,17, sedangkan rerata hypertrophy kelompok eksperimen 2 otot biceps 33,295±2,55, otottriceps 34,335±2,42. Hasil Uji-t data post test otot biceps nilai thitung = 2,21 &amp;gt; 2,10 dan otot tricepsthitung = 2,15 &amp;gt; 2,10 jadi terdapat perbedaan hasil hypertrophy otot lengan biceps dan triceps antarakelompok eksperimen 1 dan eksperimen 2 setelah diberikan treatment. Simpulan hasil penelitianadalah metode compound set lebih efektif meningkatkan hasil hypertrophy otot lengan, sehinggapelatih sebaiknya menerapkan metode compound set untuk meningkatkan hypertrophy otot lengan.Kata Kunci: Compound Set, Fitness, Hypertrophy, Set System
AbstractExercise methods are often used member on the hypertrophy program that is set system and compound set. Thisstudy aims to analyze the differences in the effectiveness of weight training using set system method andcompound set method of arm muscle hypertrophy on Pion Gym Semarang member's. The research design istrue experimental design with pre test-post test control group design method. The research population is allmembers of Pion Gym fitness Semarang. Samples totaling 20 members were taken by purposive samplingtechnique. Experiment group 1 was given set system method and experiment group 2 was given compound setmethod. The results of research, average hypertrophy on experimental group 1 of the biceps muscle is 32,8 ±3,01, and the triceps muscle is 33,7375 ± 3,17, while average hypertrophy on experimental group 2 of thebiceps muscle is 33,295 ± 2,55, and the muscle triceps is 34.335 ± 2.42. The result of t-test of post test data,biceps muscle tct = 2,21&amp;gt; 2,10 and triceps tct = 2,15&amp;gt; 2,10 so there is any difference of hypertrophy result ofbiceps and triceps muscles between experiment group 1 and experiment 2 group after given treatments.Conclusion of the research is the compound set method is more effective in improving hypertrophy result of armmuscle, so the trainer should apply the compound set practice method to improve the arm muscle hypertrophy.Keywords: Compound Set, Fitness, Hypertrophy, Set System </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Department of Sports Science, Faculty of Sports Science, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-05-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jssf/article/view/40200</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jssf.v6i1.40200</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Sport Science and Fitness; Vol 6 No 1 (2020); 6-12</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2745-5718</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6528</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jssf.v6i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jssf/article/view/40200/16630</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>