Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Navigating “Second-Class” Citizenship: Minority Perceptions of the “Gospel City” Regulation in Manokwari

Lex Scientia Law Review · Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026) · pp. 465–492

DOI
10.15294/lslr.v10i1.47364
ISSN
2598-9685, 2598-9677
Published
2026-06-30
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstract

This article examines the implications of Manokwari Regency Regulation No. 3 of 2018 concerning the Arrangement of Manokwari as a Gospel City (Penataan Manokwari sebagai Daerah Injil) for the civil rights of religious minorities and explores how religion-related regional regulations can be formulated to strengthen national integration. Drawing on the theories of symbolic legislation, legal pluralism, and accommodative leadership, the study employs a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach based on in-depth interviews with Muslim, Hindu, and Buddhist religious leaders in Manokwari. The findings reveal a paradoxical relationship between symbolic law and social reality. At the symbolic level, many minority respondents perceive the regulation as privileging a particular religious identity and raising concerns regarding equality, recognition, and religious freedom. However, its practical impact on the everyday lives of minority communities remains limited. This is largely because the most restrictive provisions contained in earlier drafts were removed, no implementing regulations were subsequently issued, and the regulation's effects have been moderated by local mechanisms of coexistence. The study highlights the importance of the Satu Tungku Tiga Batu philosophy, customary authority, and accommodative local leadership in sustaining interreligious harmony and mitigating the potential exclusionary effects of formal law. The article argues that the Manokwari case illustrates the limits of symbolic legislation in shaping social relations within a plural society. It concludes that the protection of minority rights and the strengthening of national integration are more likely to be achieved through inclusive, non-discriminatory, and substantively oriented regulations that accommodate legal and cultural diversity rather than through the formal affirmation of a single religious identity.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 114 co-authorship links · 20 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Northern Illinois University
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry
  • Universitas Wahid Hasyim
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA
  • University of Debrecen
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Suhadi SuhadiState University of Semarang4
Dina Silvia PuteriState University of Semarang3
Asmarani RamliState University of Semarang2
Zahra MauludinaState University of Semarang2
Brian MarcelinoState University of Semarang2
Choirunnisa AdleaState University of Semarang2
Syatriawan LaguraState University of Semarang2
Ridwan ArifinState University of Semarang2
Irawaty IrawatyState University of Semarang2
Widya KusumasariState University of Semarang2
IsnaniAffiliation unknown1
Ardi Sirajudin RaufState University of Semarang1
Imam BaehaqieState University of Semarang1
Lucky Andinna SantyokoState University of Semarang1
Muhammad RidhaUniversitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry1
Martitah MartitahState University of Semarang1
Elyna Noor Dina NazlaAffiliation unknown1
Yurida Zakky UmamiUniversitas Wahid Hasyim1
Sudijono SastroatmodjoState University of Semarang1
Isnani IsnaniState University of Semarang1
Ratih DamayantiState University of Semarang1
Ali Masyhar MursyidState University of Semarang1
Feiruz Rachmita AlamsyahState University of Semarang1
Muhammad Azil MasykurState University of Semarang1
Dewi SulistianingsihState University of Semarang1
I Made Widia Wirya PutraAffiliation unknown1
Rendy Razie HendrawanState University of Semarang1
Ayup Suran NingsihState University of Semarang1
Roziya AbuUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Suhadi SuhadiState University of Semarang1
Tri Andari DahlanState University of Semarang1
Tamás FézerUniversity of Debrecen1
Irawaty IrawatyState University of Semarang1
Duhita Driyah SupraptiState University of Semarang1
Wara Dyah Pita RenggaState University of Semarang1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Navigating “Second-Class” Citizenship: Minority Perceptions of the “Gospel City” Regulation in Manokwari</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Dani Muhtada</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Kurniawan, Dwi Wisnu</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Alkhair, Rayyan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Fatahillah, Javandalas Nanda Yasser</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Amal, Andi Gazly Satrya</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Civil Rights</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Gospel City Regulation</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Local Wisdom</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Minority Groups</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Religious Legislation</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This article examines the implications of Manokwari Regency Regulation No. 3 of 2018 concerning the Arrangement of Manokwari as a Gospel City (Penataan Manokwari sebagai Daerah Injil) for the civil rights of religious minorities and explores how religion-related regional regulations can be formulated to strengthen national integration. Drawing on the theories of symbolic legislation, legal pluralism, and accommodative leadership, the study employs a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach based on in-depth interviews with Muslim, Hindu, and Buddhist religious leaders in Manokwari. The findings reveal a paradoxical relationship between symbolic law and social reality. At the symbolic level, many minority respondents perceive the regulation as privileging a particular religious identity and raising concerns regarding equality, recognition, and religious freedom. However, its practical impact on the everyday lives of minority communities remains limited. This is largely because the most restrictive provisions contained in earlier drafts were removed, no implementing regulations were subsequently issued, and the regulation's effects have been moderated by local mechanisms of coexistence. The study highlights the importance of the Satu Tungku Tiga Batu philosophy, customary authority, and accommodative local leadership in sustaining interreligious harmony and mitigating the potential exclusionary effects of formal law. The article argues that the Manokwari case illustrates the limits of symbolic legislation in shaping social relations within a plural society. It concludes that the protection of minority rights and the strengthening of national integration are more likely to be achieved through inclusive, non-discriminatory, and substantively oriented regulations that accommodate legal and cultural diversity rather than through the formal affirmation of a single religious identity.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-06-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/47364</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/lslr.v10i1.47364</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Lex Scientia Law Review; Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Legal Reform, Human Rights Protection, and Judicial Innovation in Contemporary Era; 465-492</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-9685</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-9677</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/lslr.v10i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/lslr/article/view/47364/10461</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Dani Muhtada (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>