Journal
Gender Differences in Physical Education Motivation and Psychological Needs Satisfaction: Self-Determination Perspective
ACTIVE: Journal of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation · Vol. 15 No. 2 (2026) · pp. 1018–1025
ISSN 2460-724X, 2252-6773
Published 2026-06-15
Publisher Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language eng
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze gender differences in PE learning motivation and basic psychological needs satisfaction from the perspective of Self-Determination Theory (SDT) among students at SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Semarang. This study used a quantitative comparative research design involving 91 students consisting of 36 male and 55 female students. Data were collected using the Basic Psychological Needs in Physical Education (BPNS-PE) and Perceived Locus of Causality (PLOC) questionnaires. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality tests, and the Mann–Whitney U test. The results showed that there was no significant difference in PE learning motivation between male and female students (p = 0.111). However, significant differences were found in basic psychological needs satisfaction (p = 0.001), where male students demonstrated higher levels of autonomy, competence, and relatedness compared to female students. These findings indicate that psychological experiences during PE learning activities may differ according to gender. Therefore, teachers need to create inclusive and supportive learning environments to improve students’ motivation and psychological needs satisfaction during PE learning.
Collaboration network of the authors
20 authors ·
44 co-authorship links
Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.
Universitas Jambi Affiliation unknown
Different organisations
Same organisation
Affiliation unknown
Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.
Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/peshr/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title xml:lang="en">Gender Differences in Physical Education Motivation and Psychological Needs Satisfaction: Self-Determination Perspective</dc:title>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Kuncoro, Harum Janata</dc:creator>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Afifah, Hijrah Maulidiah </dc:creator>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">learning motivation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">psychological needs</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">physical education</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">gender</dc:subject>
<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study aimed to analyze gender differences in PE learning motivation and basic psychological needs satisfaction from the perspective of Self-Determination Theory (SDT) among students at SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Semarang. This study used a quantitative comparative research design involving 91 students consisting of 36 male and 55 female students. Data were collected using the Basic Psychological Needs in Physical Education (BPNS-PE) and Perceived Locus of Causality (PLOC) questionnaires. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality tests, and the Mann–Whitney U test. The results showed that there was no significant difference in PE learning motivation between male and female students (p = 0.111). However, significant differences were found in basic psychological needs satisfaction (p = 0.001), where male students demonstrated higher levels of autonomy, competence, and relatedness compared to female students. These findings indicate that psychological experiences during PE learning activities may differ according to gender. Therefore, teachers need to create inclusive and supportive learning environments to improve students’ motivation and psychological needs satisfaction during PE learning.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2026-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/peshr/article/view/49835</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.15294/active.v15i2.49835</dc:identifier>
<dc:source xml:lang="en">ACTIVE: Journal of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2026); 1018-1025</dc:source>
<dc:source>2460-724X</dc:source>
<dc:source>2252-6773</dc:source>
<dc:source>10.15294/active.v15i2</dc:source>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/peshr/article/view/49835/10158</dc:relation>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 ACTIVE: Journal of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
Citations and indexing
OpenAlex
Not checked
Crossref
Indexed
via DOI
0 citations
Counts as reported by each index on 9 Nov 2026; indexes count citations differently.
Cite this article
APA 7
Kuncoro, H. J., & Afifah, H. M. (2026). Gender Differences in Physical Education Motivation and Psychological Needs Satisfaction: Self-Determination Perspective. ACTIVE: Journal of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation, 15(2), 1018–1025. https://doi.org/10.15294/active.v15i2.49835
Copy
IEEE
H. J. Kuncoro and H. M. Afifah, “Gender Differences in Physical Education Motivation and Psychological Needs Satisfaction: Self-Determination Perspective,” ACTIVE: Journal of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1018–1025, 2026, doi: 10.15294/active.v15i2.49835.
Copy
Generated from the journal's metadata; check author names before use.