Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Pancasila as Main Reference of Ideology for Indonesian Legal Reform

Law Research Review Quarterly · Vol. 2 No. 1 (2016) · pp. 65–78

DOI
10.15294/snh.v2i01.21299
ISSN
2716-3415
Published
2016-02-29
Publisher
Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

The implementation of Pancasila in the context of Indonesian state life includes two things. First, it describes the basic values ​​of Pancasila into state ethical norms which contain a set of five basic ideas that can be a source of inspiration and solutions for the problems of Indonesian nationality. Second, it describes the five basic values ​​of Pancasila into the norms of state law, namely the rules of state legislation where the contents of the material do not conflict with Pancasila itself. The context of this implementation is that Ideology is the center for Indonesian Legal Reform. The renewal of Indonesian law was born in the nation's historical dynamics which have always sought Indonesian law based on the reality of the legal needs of Indonesian people who are plural in homogeneity of diversity. The reality which shows that it is not easy to reach legal ontology, namely justice and prosperity, in the development of Indonesian law through legal stages in the substance of civil law law in the reform era (first amendment) in Article 1 of the 1945 Constitution by adopting common law. Some alternative directions for Indonesian law in the context of reform are to combine several values ​​of the legal system. The author concludes that based on the ideology of Pancasila, the Qibla of Indonesian Legal Reform is more than Progressive Law which is based on the Humanitarian God of Deliberation and Social Justice.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 156 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Waspiah WaspiahAffiliation unknown16
Ridwan ArifinAffiliation unknown9
Dian LatifianiAffiliation unknown6
Indah Sri UtariAffiliation unknown4
Asyaffa Ridzqi AmandhaAffiliation unknown4
Suhadi SuhadiAffiliation unknown4
Kartika Fajar CahyaniAffiliation unknown3
Adinda Ratna PertiwiAffiliation unknown3
Asmarani RamliAffiliation unknown3
Muhammad Iqbal BaiquniAffiliation unknown3
Nadiyah Meyliana PutriAffiliation unknown3
Ratih DamayantiState University of Semarang3
Ali MasyharAffiliation unknown3
Dewi SulistianingsihState University of Semarang2
Mohammad Reza FachruddinAffiliation unknown2
Purniawati PurniawatiAffiliation unknown2
Nikmatul KasanaAffiliation unknown2
Andry SetiawanAffiliation unknown2
Bayu BimantaraAffiliation unknown2
Bagus Edi PrayogoAffiliation unknown2
Amanah AmanahAffiliation unknown2
Tirta Mulya Wira PradanaAffiliation unknown2
Dede Alvin SetiajiAffiliation unknown2
Fitria DamayantiAffiliation unknown2
Umi AfiatunAffiliation unknown2
Muhammad Azil MaskurAffiliation unknown2
Putri Balqis Nuril HakimAffiliation unknown2
Ahmad Gelora MahardikaAffiliation unknown2
Bayangsari WedhatamiAffiliation unknown2
Suwandoko SuwandokoAffiliation unknown2
Batari LaskarwatiAffiliation unknown2
Ahmad Zaharuddin Sani Ahmad SabriAffiliation unknown2
Roziya AbuAffiliation unknown2
Nicholas Khoo Kim SengAffiliation unknown2
Anita Indah WidiastutiAffiliation unknown1
Adelia Setya AyuAffiliation unknown1
Ahsana NadiyyaAffiliation unknown1
Ajib Mukadirin AbsorAffiliation unknown1
Ngboawaji Daniel NteAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/snh/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Pancasila as Main Reference of Ideology for Indonesian Legal Reform</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Rodiyah, Rodiyah</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The implementation of Pancasila in the context of Indonesian state life includes two things. First, it describes the basic values ​​of Pancasila into state ethical norms which contain a set of five basic ideas that can be a source of inspiration and solutions for the problems of Indonesian nationality. Second, it describes the five basic values ​​of Pancasila into the norms of state law, namely the rules of state legislation where the contents of the material do not conflict with Pancasila itself. The context of this implementation is that Ideology is the center for Indonesian Legal Reform. The renewal of Indonesian law was born in the nation's historical dynamics which have always sought Indonesian law based on the reality of the legal needs of Indonesian people who are plural in homogeneity of diversity. The reality which shows that it is not easy to reach legal ontology, namely justice and prosperity, in the development of Indonesian law through legal stages in the substance of civil law law in the reform era (first amendment) in Article 1 of the 1945 Constitution by adopting common law. Some alternative directions for Indonesian law in the context of reform are to combine several values ​​of the legal system. The author concludes that based on the ideology of Pancasila, the Qibla of Indonesian Legal Reform is more than Progressive Law which is based on the Humanitarian God of Deliberation and Social Justice.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2016-02-29</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/snh/article/view/21299</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/snh.v2i01.21299</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Law Research Review Quarterly; Vol 2 No 1 (2016): L. Research Rev. Q. (February 2016) "Pancasila and Global Ideology: Challenges and Contemporary Issues Part I"; 65-78</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2716-3415</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/snh.v2i01</dc:source>
</oai_dc:dc>