Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

The Effectiveness of 5e Inquiry Learning Model by Using Interactive Notebook on The Subject of Cell

Journal of Biology Education · Vol. 7 No. 3 (2018) · pp. 253–256

DOI
10.15294/jbe.v7i3.27188
ISSN
2540-833X, 2252-6579
Published
2018-11-30
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to discover and describe the effectiveness of 5E inquiry learning model by using interactive notebook on the subject of cell. It was a quantitative quasi-experimental research with nonequivalent control group design. The population of this study was the whole eleventh grade science students of SMA Negeri 1 Magelang. The researchers used simple random sampling which took the students from Class Science 1 of eleventh grade as the experimental class and Class Science 3 of eleventh grade as the control class. In collecting the data, the researchers used the result of pre-test, post-test and the grades of students from experimental class (using interactive notebook) then the assessment of control class students’ laboratory work report performance. Normality test, homogeneity test, average difference test, the improvement of learning skill measurement, and classical completeness measurement were used for data analysis. The result shown that 5E Inquiry-Learning Model by Using Interactive Notebook on the Subject ‘Cell’ was effective. It was proved by the average of both of classes (experimental class and control class) was significantly different (tcount (7.36) > ttable (2.00)). The difference was supported by the fact that the improvement of learning skill of experimental class students was better the control class students. For the experimental class, the improvement of student learning skill was categorized as medium (index gained 0.61) while control class’ was low (index gained 0.29). In addition, the experimental class had reached the classical completeness rate (the percentage was 87.89%) while the control class had not reached it yet (around 27.27%).

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 126 co-authorship links · 3 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Diponegoro University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Sri SukaesihState University of Semarang2
Nur Kusuma DewiAffiliation unknown2
Ning SetiatiAffiliation unknown2
Andreas Priyono Budi PrasetyoState University of Semarang2
Andin IrsadiState University of Semarang2
Lina HerlinaDiponegoro University2
Sri NgabektiState University of Semarang2
Lisdiana LisdianaAffiliation unknown2
Retno Sri IswariState University of Semarang2
Junica FitrianaAffiliation unknown1
Dyah Rini IndriyantiState University of Semarang1
Margaretha PangaribuanAffiliation unknown1
Bambang PriyonoState University of Semarang1
Tia PrasetyaningtyasAffiliation unknown1
Septima Raras budiatiAffiliation unknown1
Jamaludin AfifAffiliation unknown1
LisdianaAffiliation unknown1
Defrianto Alfika PutraAffiliation unknown1
Nana Kariada Tri MartutiState University of Semarang1
Hengky PurwantoAffiliation unknown1
Siti RosidahAffiliation unknown1
Yustinus Ulung AnggraitoAffiliation unknown1
Enni Suwarsi RahayuState University of Semarang1
Laila Nur Hidayah HidayahAffiliation unknown1
Surya DiantinaAffiliation unknown1
Umi Salmah Al HasyimiaAffiliation unknown1
Mateus Krista Pratama PutraAffiliation unknown1
Sri KhanifahAffiliation unknown1
Andreas Junaedi Raja Guk GukAffiliation unknown1
Pramesti DewiAffiliation unknown1
Silvia NurbaitiAffiliation unknown1
Saiful RidloState University of Semarang1
Nina KholinaAffiliation unknown1
Tuti WidiantiAffiliation unknown1
Arrynda RatnaningsihAffiliation unknown1
Gandi Adi NugrohoAffiliation unknown1
Dihan PrasetiyantoAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujbe/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Effectiveness of 5e Inquiry Learning Model by Using Interactive Notebook on The Subject of Cell</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Prabawati, Faricha</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Pribadi, Tyas Agung</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Pukan, Krispinus Kedati</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The purpose of this study was to discover and describe the effectiveness of 5E inquiry learning model by using interactive notebook on the subject of cell. It was a quantitative quasi-experimental research with nonequivalent control group design. The population of this study was the whole eleventh grade science students of SMA Negeri 1 Magelang. The researchers used simple random sampling which took the students from &amp;nbsp;Class Science 1 of eleventh grade as the experimental class and Class Science 3 of eleventh grade as the control class. In collecting the data, the researchers used the result of pre-test, post-test and the grades of students from experimental class (using interactive notebook) then the assessment of control class students’ laboratory work report performance. Normality test, homogeneity test, average difference test, the improvement of learning skill measurement, and classical completeness measurement were used for data analysis. The result shown that 5E Inquiry-Learning Model by Using Interactive Notebook&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; on the Subject ‘Cell’ was effective. It was proved by the average of both of classes (experimental class and control class) was significantly different (tcount (7.36) &amp;gt; ttable (2.00)). The difference was supported by the fact that the improvement of learning skill of experimental class students was better the control class students. For the experimental class, the improvement of student learning skill was categorized as medium (index gained 0.61) while control class’ was low (index gained 0.29). In addition, the experimental class had reached the classical completeness rate (the percentage was 87.89%) while the control class had not reached it yet (around 27.27%).</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-11-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujbe/article/view/27188</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jbe.v7i3.27188</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Biology Education; Vol 7 No 3 (2018): December 2018; 253-256</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2540-833X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6579</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jbe.v7i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujbe/article/view/27188/12051</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Biology Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>