Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Navigating Regional Regulatory Changes in Indonesia: An In-Depth Analysis of Post-Amendment Implementation of Law Number 12 of 2011 on Legislation Formation

Unnes Law Journal · Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023) · pp. 237–264

DOI
10.15294/ulj.v9i2.37192
ISSN
2252-6536
Published
2023-10-31
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstract

In the context of Indonesia as a State of Law, the imperative role of the rule of law cannot be overstated in realizing the state's objectives. The formulation of Legislative Regulations, essential for upholding the rule of law, necessitates meticulous consideration of three fundamental principles: benefit, justice, and legal clarity. To ensure the effectiveness of these regulations in aligning with the direction and goals of national legal development, the process adheres to key principles, encompassing the clarity of objectives, appropriate institutional involvement, congruence among types, hierarchy, and material content, practicability, clarity of formulation, and transparency. This procedural framework is consistently implemented in a sustainable, coordinated, and integrated manner. The legal landscape in Indonesia underwent significant transformations with the enactment of Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation, introducing the omnibus law technique. However, the subsequent Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 provisionally deemed this law unconstitutional. Responding to this decision, Law Number 12 of 2011 underwent a substantial amendment through Law Number 13 of 2022, specifically addressing the omnibus approach and enhancing meaningful public participation in statutory rule creation. This legal revision significantly influences the development of legal instruments at the regional level. Consequently, an examination of the implementation of regional legal product formation becomes imperative post the amendment of Law Number 12 of 2011 on the Formation of Legislative Regulations.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 147 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Riska AlkadriAffiliation unknown8
Ridwan ArifinAffiliation unknown7
Wahyu DwiantoAffiliation unknown5
Rodiyah RodiyahAffiliation unknown5
Aprila NiravitaAffiliation unknown4
Danang Sudarwoko AdiAffiliation unknown4
Bintang Rafli AnantaAffiliation unknown3
Muhammad Azil MaskurAffiliation unknown3
Yusup AminAffiliation unknown3
Ubaidillah KamalAffiliation unknown3
Winarsih WinarsihState University of Semarang2
Mutmainah Nur QoiriAffiliation unknown2
Rini FidiyaniAffiliation unknown2
Destika Santi Putri SarfitriAffiliation unknown2
Jamaluddin Jamal MuhsenAffiliation unknown2
Indah Sri UtariAffiliation unknown2
Diandra Preludio RamadaAffiliation unknown2
Radini SintaAffiliation unknown2
Sri Redjeki PrasetyowatiAffiliation unknown2
Zainurohmah ZainurohmahAffiliation unknown2
Nadiyah Meyliana PutriAffiliation unknown2
Muhammad Wahyu Saiful HudaAffiliation unknown2
Sukma Jati HusodoAffiliation unknown2
Sinta SwastiAffiliation unknown2
Ridoan KarimAffiliation unknown2
Fraz Ashraf KhanAffiliation unknown2
Batari LaskarwatiAffiliation unknown2
Benny SumardianaAffiliation unknown2
Syukron SalamAffiliation unknown2
Iqbal SyariefudinAffiliation unknown2
Dewi PuspasariAffiliation unknown2
Putri Balqis Nuril HakimAffiliation unknown2
Ahmad Gelora MahardikaAffiliation unknown2
Ali MasyharAffiliation unknown2
Fitriani AbdiAffiliation unknown2
Ary Muktian SyahAffiliation unknown2
Dani MuhtadaAffiliation unknown2

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ulj/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Navigating Regional Regulatory Changes in Indonesia: An In-Depth Analysis of Post-Amendment Implementation of Law Number 12 of 2011 on Legislation Formation</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Wedhatami, Bayangsari</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Damayanti, Ratih</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Prasasi, Cindy Ayu</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">In the context of Indonesia as a State of Law, the imperative role of the rule of law cannot be overstated in realizing the state's objectives. The formulation of Legislative Regulations, essential for upholding the rule of law, necessitates meticulous consideration of three fundamental principles: benefit, justice, and legal clarity. To ensure the effectiveness of these regulations in aligning with the direction and goals of national legal development, the process adheres to key principles, encompassing the clarity of objectives, appropriate institutional involvement, congruence among types, hierarchy, and material content, practicability, clarity of formulation, and transparency. This procedural framework is consistently implemented in a sustainable, coordinated, and integrated manner. The legal landscape in Indonesia underwent significant transformations with the enactment of Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation, introducing the omnibus law technique. However, the subsequent Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 provisionally deemed this law unconstitutional. Responding to this decision, Law Number 12 of 2011 underwent a substantial amendment through Law Number 13 of 2022, specifically addressing the omnibus approach and enhancing meaningful public participation in statutory rule creation. This legal revision significantly influences the development of legal instruments at the regional level. Consequently, an examination of the implementation of regional legal product formation becomes imperative post the amendment of Law Number 12 of 2011 on the Formation of Legislative Regulations.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-10-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ulj/article/view/37192</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ulj.v9i2.37192</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Unnes Law Journal; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): Law in a Changing World: Legal Certainty, Justice, and Institutional Transformation; 237-264</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6536</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ulj.v9i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ulj/article/view/37192/7203</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>