Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MENYELESAIKAN PERKARA CONSTITUTIONAL COMPLAINT BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR TAHUN 1945

Unnes Law Journal · Vol. 3 No. 1 (2014)

DOI
10.15294/ulj.v3i1.3632
ISSN
2252-6536
Published
2014-10-10
Publisher
Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Diadopsinya mekanisme constitutional complaint dalam sistem peradilan konstitusi adalah bagian dari perlindungan terhadap hak konstitusional warga negara. Tetapi, Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai lembaga yudikatif yang bertugas mengawal tegaknya konstitusi belum diberikan kewenangan untuk mengadili perkara pengaduan konstitusional..Hasil dari penelitian skripsi ini adalah: secara legal formal, UUD Tahun 1945 tidak memberi peluang untuk MK RI dalam menyelesaikan perkara constitutional complaint tanpa melalui amandemen; MK memiliki prospek untuk menyelesaikan perkara constitutional complaint dimasa mendatang, karena banyak perkara pengujian undang-undang yang masuk ke MK secara substansi merupakan pengaduan konstitusional; Mekanisme constitutional complaint di Indonesia sama seperti mekanisme judicial review, yaitu dari pemohon, objek dan persyaratan. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini yaitu, MK tidak memiliki peluang menyelesaikan perkara constitutional complaint berdasarkan UUD 1945; MK memiliki prospek mengadili perkara constitutional complaint dimasa mendatang, karena banyak kasus constitutional complaint yang terjadi dimasyarakat tidak dapat diselesaikan sehingga membuat kekosongan hukum; mekanisme constitutional complaint di Indonesia di masa mendatang dapat mengadopsi mekanisme constitutional complaint Federal Jerman, berkaitan dengan legal standing pemohon, objek permohonan dan syarat permohonan.Adoption of the constitutional complaint mechanism in the judicial system is part of the constitutional protection of the constitutional rights of citizens. However, the Constitutional Court as a judicial body in charge of guarding the enforcement of the constitution has not been given the authority to adjudicate constitutional complaints. The results of this research are: a formal legal basis, the Constitution of 1945 did not provide an opportunity to resolve the Constitutional Court in the case of constitutional complaint without amendment; The Court has the prospect to complete the constitutional complaint case in the future, because many cases testing laws that go into the substance of the Court in a constitutional complaint; The mechanism of the constitutional complaint in Indonesia the same as the mechanism of judicial review, that is, from the applicant, objects and requirements. The conclusions of this study are, the Court does not have the chance resolve the constitutional complaint case under the 1945 Constitution; The Court has heard the cases of constitutional complaint prospects in the future, because many cases occur in the community constitutional complaint can not be resolved so as to make void the law; the mechanism of the constitutional complaint in Indonesia in the future to adopt the German Federal constitutional complaint mechanism, related to the legal standing of the applicant, the object of the petition and the petition requirements.

Collaboration network of the authors

9 authors · 14 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Andalas University
  • Universitas Almuslim
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Sholahuddin Al-FatihAffiliation unknown8
Tonye Clinton JajaAffiliation unknown1
Elwi DanilAndalas University1
M. Guntur HamzahAffiliation unknown1
Pan Mohamad Faiz Kusuma W.Affiliation unknown1
Muhammad Reza WinataAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad NurUniversitas Almuslim1
Abdul Basid FuadiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ulj/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MENYELESAIKAN PERKARA CONSTITUTIONAL COMPLAINT BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR TAHUN 1945</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>aditya, zaka firma</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Diadopsinya mekanisme constitutional complaint dalam sistem peradilan konstitusi adalah bagian dari perlindungan terhadap hak konstitusional warga negara. Tetapi, Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai lembaga yudikatif yang bertugas mengawal tegaknya konstitusi belum diberikan kewenangan untuk mengadili perkara pengaduan konstitusional..Hasil dari penelitian skripsi ini adalah: secara legal formal, UUD Tahun 1945 tidak memberi peluang untuk MK RI dalam menyelesaikan perkara constitutional complaint tanpa melalui amandemen; MK memiliki prospek untuk menyelesaikan perkara constitutional complaint dimasa mendatang, karena banyak perkara pengujian undang-undang yang masuk ke MK secara substansi merupakan pengaduan konstitusional; Mekanisme constitutional complaint di Indonesia sama seperti mekanisme judicial review, yaitu dari pemohon, objek dan persyaratan. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini yaitu, MK tidak memiliki peluang menyelesaikan perkara constitutional complaint berdasarkan UUD 1945; MK memiliki prospek mengadili perkara constitutional complaint dimasa mendatang, karena banyak kasus constitutional complaint yang terjadi dimasyarakat tidak dapat diselesaikan sehingga membuat kekosongan hukum; mekanisme constitutional complaint di Indonesia di masa mendatang dapat mengadopsi mekanisme constitutional complaint Federal Jerman, berkaitan dengan legal standing pemohon, objek permohonan dan syarat permohonan.Adoption of the constitutional complaint mechanism in the judicial system is part of the constitutional protection of the constitutional rights of citizens . However , the Constitutional Court as a judicial body in charge of guarding the enforcement of the constitution has not been given the authority to adjudicate constitutional complaints. The results of this research are : a formal legal basis , the Constitution of 1945 did not provide an opportunity to resolve the Constitutional Court in the case of constitutional complaint without amendment ; The Court has the prospect to complete the constitutional complaint case in the future , because many cases testing laws that go into the substance of the Court in a constitutional complaint ; The mechanism of the constitutional complaint in Indonesia the same as the mechanism of judicial review , that is, from the applicant , objects and requirements . The conclusions of this study are , the Court does not have the chance resolve the constitutional complaint case under the 1945 Constitution; The Court has heard the cases of constitutional complaint prospects in the future, because many cases occur in the community constitutional complaint can not be resolved so as to make void the law; the mechanism of the constitutional complaint in Indonesia in the future to adopt the German Federal constitutional complaint mechanism , related to the legal standing of the applicant, the object of the petition and the petition requirements .</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2014-10-10</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ulj/article/view/3632</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ulj.v3i1.3632</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Unnes Law Journal; Vol 3 No 1 (2014): Unnes L.J. (April, 2014)</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6536</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ulj.v3i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ulj/article/view/3632/3244</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>