Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tugas dan Kewenangan Jaksa sebagai Penyidik dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi

PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law · Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021) · pp. 1–11

DOI
10.22437/pampas.v1i3.11084
ISSN
2721-8325, 2721-7205
Published
2021-04-23
Publisher
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

ABSTRAK Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis bagaimana tugas dan kewenangan jaksa sebagai penyidik dalam tindak pidana korupsi dan menganalisis bagaimana tugas dan kewenangan jaksa sebagai penyidik dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi di masa yang akan datang. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah 1)Bahwa dari segi yuridis, jaksa memiliki wewenang dalam melakukan penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi, namun kewenangan masing-masing sub sistem dalam sistem peradilan pidana tindak pidana korupsi harus diperjelas karena sangat menentukan sekali agar kepastian hukum dan kesebandingan hukum dapat tercapai. 2)Bahwa kewenangan penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi yang dimiliki oleh jaksa saat ini berbenturan dengan sistem peradilan pidana yang berlaku di Indonesia. Jika kewenangan penyidikan oleh kejaksaan masih dipertahankan maka terkesan tidak adanya koordinasi antar lembaga penegak hukum karena hampir dalam setiap tahapan penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi yaitu tahap penyelidikan, penyidikan, penuntutan dan pelaksanaan putusan pengadilan atau eksekusi, dimiliki oleh lembaga kejaksaan. ABSTRACT This article aims to find out and analyze how the duties and powers of prosecutors as investigators in criminal acts of corruption and analyze the duties and powers of prosecutors as investigators in corruption in the future. The research method used is normative juridical. The results are 1) Whereas from a juridical perspective, the prosecutor has the authority to carry out investigations into criminal acts of corruption, however, the authority of each sub-system in the criminal justice system for corruption must be clarified because it is very decisive so that legal certainty and legal equivalence can be achieved. 2) Whereas the prosecutor's current authority to investigate criminal acts of corruption clashes with the criminal justice system in force in Indonesia. If the investigative authority is maintained by the prosecutor's office, it seems that there is no coordination between law enforcement agencies because almost every stage of law enforcement on corruption, namely the investigation, investigation, prosecution and implementation of court decisions or executions, is owned by the prosecutor's office.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 122 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Hasanuddin University
  • Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Elly SudartiAffiliation unknown12
Dheny WahyudhiAffiliation unknown4
Yulia MonitaAffiliation unknown4
Khabib NawawiAffiliation unknown3
Nys. ArfaAffiliation unknown3
Dessy RakhmawatiAffiliation unknown3
Andi NajemiAffiliation unknown3
Sri RahayuHasanuddin University2
Hafrida HafridaAffiliation unknown2
Mohamad RapikAffiliation unknown2
Herry LiyusAffiliation unknown2
Ahmad Novindri Aji SukmaAffiliation unknown1
Angga Aldilla GusmanAffiliation unknown1
Moh Hasyim Asy'ariAffiliation unknown1
Ammar Zul HaidarAffiliation unknown1
Mutia Carolina FransicaAffiliation unknown1
Elly SudartyAffiliation unknown1
Erwin ErwinAffiliation unknown1
Harry Setya NugrahaAffiliation unknown1
Johni NajwanAffiliation unknown1
M. Zulva AuliaAffiliation unknown1
Erwin ErwinAffiliation unknown1
Rosmidah RosmidahAffiliation unknown1
Dony Yusra PebriantoAffiliation unknown1
Usman UsmanUniversitas Syiah Kuala1
Ell SudartiAffiliation unknown1
Erwin ErwinAffiliation unknown1
Akbar Kurnia PutraAffiliation unknown1
Bernard SipahutarAffiliation unknown1
Budi ArdiantoAffiliation unknown1
Umar HasanAffiliation unknown1
Erwin ErwinAffiliation unknown1
Sintia FebrianiAffiliation unknown1
Ana Indah CahyaniAffiliation unknown1
Ardi Saputra GuloAffiliation unknown1
Desi RatnasariAffiliation unknown1
Ahsanul RaufAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/Pampas/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tugas dan Kewenangan Jaksa sebagai Penyidik dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Kurnia, Vani</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Lasmadi, Sahuri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Siregar, Elizabeth </dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Kewenangan jaksa</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">korupsi</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">penyidik</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">tindak pidana</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">ABSTRAK
Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis bagaimana tugas dan kewenangan jaksa sebagai penyidik dalam tindak pidana korupsi dan menganalisis bagaimana tugas dan kewenangan jaksa sebagai penyidik dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi di masa yang akan datang. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah 1)Bahwa dari segi yuridis, jaksa memiliki wewenang dalam melakukan penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi, namun kewenangan masing-masing sub sistem dalam sistem peradilan pidana tindak pidana korupsi harus diperjelas karena sangat menentukan sekali agar kepastian hukum dan kesebandingan hukum dapat tercapai. 2)Bahwa kewenangan penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi yang dimiliki oleh jaksa saat ini berbenturan dengan sistem peradilan pidana yang berlaku di Indonesia. Jika kewenangan penyidikan oleh kejaksaan masih dipertahankan maka terkesan tidak adanya koordinasi antar lembaga penegak hukum karena hampir dalam setiap tahapan penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi yaitu tahap penyelidikan, penyidikan, penuntutan dan pelaksanaan putusan pengadilan atau eksekusi, dimiliki oleh lembaga kejaksaan. 
ABSTRACT
This article aims to find out and analyze how the duties and powers of prosecutors as investigators in criminal acts of corruption and analyze the duties and powers of prosecutors as investigators in corruption in the future. The research method used is normative juridical. The results are 1) Whereas from a juridical perspective, the prosecutor has the authority to carry out investigations into criminal acts of corruption, however, the authority of each sub-system in the criminal justice system for corruption must be clarified because it is very decisive so that legal certainty and legal equivalence can be achieved. 2) Whereas the prosecutor's current authority to investigate criminal acts of corruption clashes with the criminal justice system in force in Indonesia. If the investigative authority is maintained by the prosecutor's office, it seems that there is no coordination between law enforcement agencies because almost every stage of law enforcement on corruption, namely the investigation, investigation, prosecution and implementation of court decisions or executions, is owned by the prosecutor's office.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-04-23</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Pampas/article/view/11084</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/pampas.v1i3.11084</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law; Vol. 1 No. 3 (2020); 1-11</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-8325</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-7205</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Pampas/article/view/11084/10230</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2021 Vani Kurnia, Sahuri Lasmadi, Elizabeth  Siregar</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>