Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi Mahkota dalam Proses Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana

PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law · Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021) · pp. 120–138

DOI
10.22437/pampas.v1i3.11088
ISSN
2721-8325, 2721-7205
Published
2021-04-23
Publisher
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

This research discusses the issue of Legal Protection for Crown Witnesses in the Criminal Case Investigation Process.The results showed that the implementation of protection for crown witnesses was considered to have been implemented. This can be seen from the many forms of protection that can be provided to witnesses, especially crown witnesses, in the form of physical, psychological and legal protection. Physical and psychological protection is in the form of protection for personal safety and freedom from threats and pressure from other parties. Meanwhile, the form of legal protection in the form of witnesses cannot be prosecuted legally, either criminal or civil, for their testimony and special handling for witnesses who are also perpetrators of the same crime (crown witness). This shows that there is an effort to realize the legal rules regarding legal protection for crown witnesses. In order to achieve better legal protection for crown witnesses, it is necessary to increase the socialization of legal rules related to witness protection to the public so that the public will better understand that there is a mechanism of legal rules regulating the protection of a crown witness. Abstrak Penelitian ini membahas masalah Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Saksi Mahkota dalam Proses Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana. Selanjutnya data yang diperoleh baik melalui studi kepustakaan maupun hasil wawancara dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode analisis deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, pelaksanaan perlindungan terhadap saksi mahkota dinilai telah terlaksana hal ini dapat di lihat dari banyaknya bentuk perlindungan yang dapat diberikan kepada saksi khususnya saksi mahkota, baik dalam bentuk perlindungan fisik, psikis maupun hukum. Bentuk perlindungan fisik dan psikis berupa Perlindungan atas keamanan diri serta bebas dari ancaman dan tekanan pihak lain. Sedangkan bentuk perlindungan hukum berupa Saksi tidak dapat dituntut secara hukum baik pidana maupun perdata atas kesaksiannya dan Penanganan secara khusus bagi saksi yang juga pelaku tindak pidana yang sama (saksi mahkota). Hal ini menunjukkan adanya upaya realisasi dari aturan-aturan hukum tentang perlindungan hukum terhadap saksi mahkota. Untuk mewujutkan perlindungan hukum terhadap saksi mahkota yang lebih baik perlu adanya upaya peningkatan sosialisasi aturan-aturan hukum terkait perlindungan saksi kepada masyarakat dengan demikian masyarakat akan lebih memahami bahwa ada suatu mekanisme aturan hukum yang mengatur perlindungan terhadap seorang saksi mahkota.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

32 authors · 94 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Sriwijaya University
  • Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Elly SudartiAffiliation unknown3
Yulia MonitaAffiliation unknown2
Sahuri LasmadiAffiliation unknown2
Herry LiyusAffiliation unknown2
Hafrida HafridaAffiliation unknown1
Evalina AlissaAffiliation unknown1
Nelly HerlinaAffiliation unknown1
Erwin ErwinSriwijaya University1
Wilda Aulia M.PAffiliation unknown1
Haryadi HaryadiAffiliation unknown1
Dona FitrianiAffiliation unknown1
Usman UsmanUniversitas Syiah Kuala1
Dien Nabila NazivaAffiliation unknown1
Silvy Amira FadiniAffiliation unknown1
Andrean Dwi YuliantoAffiliation unknown1
Akmal AkmalInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
El Firsta Nopsiamti ArAffiliation unknown1
Tiara Ayu UtamiAffiliation unknown1
Eldytha GiovaniAffiliation unknown1
Elizabeth SiregarAffiliation unknown1
Adeb Davega PrasnaAffiliation unknown1
Widia AnggrainiAffiliation unknown1
Tri Imam MunandarAffiliation unknown1
Dheny WahyudiAffiliation unknown1
Afrizal AfrizalAffiliation unknown1
Nelli HerlinaAffiliation unknown1
Elisa Feronika BR SimamoraAffiliation unknown1
Andi NajemiAffiliation unknown1
Linda AriyaniAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/Pampas/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi Mahkota dalam Proses Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana </dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Rahman, Habibie</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Purwastuty, Lilik </dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Rakhmawati, Dessy</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Perlindungan hukum</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">saksi mahkota</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This research discusses the issue of Legal Protection for Crown Witnesses in the Criminal Case Investigation Process.The results showed that the implementation of protection for crown witnesses was considered to have been implemented. This can be seen from the many forms of protection that can be provided to witnesses, especially crown witnesses, in the form of physical, psychological and legal protection. Physical and psychological protection is in the form of protection for personal safety and freedom from threats and pressure from other parties. Meanwhile, the form of legal protection in the form of witnesses cannot be prosecuted legally, either criminal or civil, for their testimony and special handling for witnesses who are also perpetrators of the same crime (crown witness). This shows that there is an effort to realize the legal rules regarding legal protection for crown witnesses. In order to achieve better legal protection for crown witnesses, it is necessary to increase the socialization of legal rules related to witness protection to the public so that the public will better understand that there is a mechanism of legal rules regulating the protection of a crown witness.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini membahas masalah Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Saksi Mahkota dalam Proses Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana. Selanjutnya data yang diperoleh baik melalui studi kepustakaan maupun hasil wawancara dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode analisis deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, pelaksanaan perlindungan terhadap saksi mahkota dinilai telah terlaksana hal ini dapat di lihat dari banyaknya bentuk perlindungan yang dapat diberikan kepada saksi khususnya saksi mahkota, baik dalam bentuk perlindungan fisik, psikis maupun hukum. Bentuk perlindungan fisik dan psikis berupa Perlindungan atas keamanan diri serta bebas dari ancaman dan tekanan pihak lain. Sedangkan bentuk perlindungan hukum berupa Saksi tidak dapat dituntut secara hukum baik pidana maupun perdata atas kesaksiannya dan Penanganan secara khusus bagi saksi yang juga pelaku tindak pidana yang sama (saksi mahkota). Hal ini menunjukkan adanya upaya realisasi dari aturan-aturan hukum tentang perlindungan hukum terhadap saksi mahkota.  Untuk mewujutkan perlindungan hukum terhadap saksi mahkota yang lebih baik perlu adanya upaya peningkatan sosialisasi aturan-aturan hukum terkait perlindungan saksi kepada masyarakat dengan demikian masyarakat akan lebih memahami bahwa ada suatu mekanisme aturan hukum yang mengatur perlindungan terhadap seorang saksi mahkota.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-04-23</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Pampas/article/view/11088</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/pampas.v1i3.11088</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law; Vol. 1 No. 3 (2020); 120-138</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-8325</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-7205</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Pampas/article/view/11088/10262</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2021 Habibie Rahman, Lilik  Purwastuty, Dessy Rakhmawati</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>