Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Kedudukan Hukum Deponeering dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana

PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law · Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021) · pp. 17–29

DOI
10.22437/pampas.v2i1.12053
ISSN
2721-8325, 2721-7205
Published
2021-04-26
Publisher
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

This article aims to identify and analyze the legal implications and analyze the regulation of public interest as a condition for implementing deponeering by the Attorney General for the sake of the public interest in the perspective of the development of criminal procedural law. This research is a legal research, obtained from statutory studies (statute approach), concept (conceptual approach), cases. The result of this research is that there is discrimination against equality before the law contained in Article 27 Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and can trigger misinterpretation by the Attorney General. Then in its implementation there is no clear regulation regarding the application of the opportunity principle related to the authority of the attorney general in the implementation of case waiver (deponeering) for the public interest in the Criminal Procedure Code. Abstrak Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis implikasi hukum serta menganalisis terhadap regulasi kepentingan umum sebagai syarat pelaksanaan pengesampingan perkara (deponeering) oleh Jaksa Agung demi kepentingan umum dalam prespektif perkembangan hukum acara pidana. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum, yang diperoleh dari studi perundang-undangan (statute approach), konsep (conceptual approach), kasus. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah adanya diskriminatif terhadap equality before the law yang terdapat dalam Pasal 27 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 dan dapat memicu salah tafsir oleh Jaksa Agung. Lalu di dalam pelaksanaannya belum terdapat regulasi yang jelas mengenai penerapan asas oportunitas yang berhubungan dengan kewenangan jaksa agung dalam pelaksanaan pengesampingan perkara (deponeering) demi kepentingan umum di dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum acara Pidana (KUHAP).Â

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 108 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Hasanuddin University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Nys. ArfaAffiliation unknown8
Dheny WahyudhiAffiliation unknown7
Dessy RakhmawatiAffiliation unknown5
Usman UsmanUniversitas Syiah Kuala4
Khabib NawawiAffiliation unknown4
Sri RahayuHasanuddin University4
Herry LiyusAffiliation unknown3
Yulia MonitaAffiliation unknown3
Elizabeth SiregarAffiliation unknown3
Dheny WahyudiAffiliation unknown2
Mohamad RapikAffiliation unknown2
Erwin ErwinAffiliation unknown2
Erwin ErwinAffiliation unknown2
Umar HasanAffiliation unknown2
Erwin ErwinAffiliation unknown2
Ahmad Novindri Aji SukmaAffiliation unknown1
Rizaldy AnggriawanAffiliation unknown1
Andi Agus SalimAffiliation unknown1
Riana Devi LestariAffiliation unknown1
Angga Aldilla GusmanAffiliation unknown1
Moh Hasyim Asy'ariAffiliation unknown1
Ammar Zul HaidarAffiliation unknown1
Mutia Carolina FransicaAffiliation unknown1
Elly SudartyAffiliation unknown1
Erwin ErwinAffiliation unknown1
Harry Setya NugrahaAffiliation unknown1
Johni NajwanAffiliation unknown1
M. Zulva AuliaAffiliation unknown1
Ell SudartiAffiliation unknown1
Sintia FebrianiAffiliation unknown1
Listiana ListianaAffiliation unknown1
M. Alvi Rizki ilahiAffiliation unknown1
Ardi Saputra GuloAffiliation unknown1
M. Hadhri NurAffiliation unknown1
Vani KurniaAffiliation unknown1
Tri Nada SariAffiliation unknown1
Sonia SoniaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/Pampas/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Kedudukan Hukum Deponeering dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ratnasari, Desi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Lasmadi, Sahuri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sudarti, Elly</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Deponeering</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">kedudukan hukum</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">sistem peradilan pidana</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This article aims to identify and analyze the legal implications and analyze the regulation of public interest as a condition for implementing deponeering by the Attorney General for the sake of the public interest in the perspective of the development of criminal procedural law. This research is a legal research, obtained from statutory studies (statute approach), concept (conceptual approach), cases. The result of this research is that there is discrimination against equality before the law contained in Article 27 Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and can trigger misinterpretation by the Attorney General. Then in its implementation there is no clear regulation regarding the application of the opportunity principle related to the authority of the attorney general in the implementation of case waiver (deponeering) for the public interest in the Criminal Procedure Code. 
Abstrak
Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis implikasi hukum serta menganalisis terhadap regulasi kepentingan umum sebagai syarat pelaksanaan pengesampingan perkara (deponeering) oleh Jaksa Agung demi kepentingan umum dalam prespektif perkembangan hukum acara pidana.  Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum, yang diperoleh dari studi perundang-undangan (statute approach), konsep (conceptual approach), kasus. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah adanya diskriminatif terhadap equality before the law yang terdapat dalam Pasal 27 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 dan dapat memicu salah tafsir oleh Jaksa Agung. Lalu di dalam pelaksanaannya belum terdapat regulasi yang jelas mengenai penerapan asas oportunitas yang berhubungan dengan kewenangan jaksa agung dalam pelaksanaan pengesampingan perkara (deponeering) demi kepentingan umum di dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum acara Pidana (KUHAP). </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-04-26</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Pampas/article/view/12053</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/pampas.v2i1.12053</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021); 17-29</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-8325</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-7205</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Pampas/article/view/12053/10897</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2021 Desi Ratnasari, Sahuri Lasmadi, Elly Sudarti</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>