Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Penerapan Pidana Denda terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Memperniagakan Satwa Dilindungi di Pengadilan Negeri Jambi

PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law · Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024) · pp. 25–37

DOI
10.22437/pampas.v5i1.31809
ISSN
2721-8325, 2721-7205
Published
2024-03-05
Publisher
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

The use of fine categories is intended to provide a clear pattern for the highest sanctions set for various offenses, in this case offenses against protected animals. Protected animals are animals that are protected by the government. The decision of Jambi District Court Judge is considered to have exceeded the maximum penalty provided for in Article 40 (2) Law Number 5 of 1990 concerning Conservation of Natural Resources and Ecosystems, so that it becomes Article 65 (2) KUHP. The problem discussed in this work is how the judge uses legal considerations in imposing a fine exceeding the maximum limit the amount of the verdict and the judge's consideration in imposing a fine exceeding the maximum pada Putusan Nomor: 401/Pid.Sus.LH/2021/PN Jmb. The research was conducted using a prescriptive legal approach. Data collection was carried out by means of literatures study. This research resulted in conclusions. That is, the judge's decision is considered to exceed the maximum criminal limit of Article 40 (2) Law Number 5 of 1990. Based on the conclusions, it’s recommended that prosecutors be more careful in determining the punishment and be more specific in preparing the prosecution. The need to change the criminal provisions in the judge's decision. Abstrak Tujuan penggunaan kategori denda adalah untuk memiliki pedoman yang jelas mengenai jumlah denda maksimal yang dapat dikenakan untuk berbagai jenis tindak pidana, seperti dalam kasus tindak pidana terhadap satwa yang dilindungi. Satwa yang dilindungi adalah satwa yang mendapatkan perlindungan dari pemerintah. Putusan hakim dari Pengadilan Negeri Jambi dianggap melampaui batas maksimum pidana denda yang ditetapkan dalam Pasal 40 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1990 tentang Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Hayati dan Ekosistemnya, sehingga bertentangan dengan Pasal 65 ayat (2) KUHP. Fokus dari skripsi ini adalah untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hukum yang digunakan oleh hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana denda yang melebihi batas maksimum, serta melakukan analisis hukum terhadap pertimbangan hakim dalam kasus Putusan Nomor: 401/Pid.Sus.LH/2021/PN Jmb. Penelitian ini dilakukan melalui pendekatan yuridis normatif dan pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa Putusan hakim tersebut melewati batas pidana denda maksimum yang ditetapkan dalam Pasal 40 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1990 tentang Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Dan Ekosistem. Berdasarkan kesimpulan ini, disarankan agar Jaksa Penuntut Umum lebih teliti dalam menetapkan ketentuan pidana dan menyusun surat dakwaan dengan tepat. Juga diperlukan revisi terhadap ketentuan pidana dalam Putusan hakim yang melampaui batas maksimum pidana denda tersebut.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 106 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • STIE Pembangunan Tanjungpinang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Yulia MonitaAffiliation unknown5
Retno KusniatiAffiliation unknown4
Tri Imam MunandarAffiliation unknown4
Haryadi HaryadiAffiliation unknown4
Dessy RakhmawatiAffiliation unknown3
Mohamad RapikAffiliation unknown2
Ivan Fauzani RaharjaAffiliation unknown2
Helmi HelmiAffiliation unknown2
Herry LiyusAffiliation unknown2
Elly SudartiAffiliation unknown2
Elizabeth SiregarAffiliation unknown2
Usman UsmanUniversitas Syiah Kuala2
Maryati MaryatiSTIE Pembangunan Tanjungpinang1
Ahmad Zaharuddin Sani Ahmad SabriAffiliation unknown1
Erwin ErwinAffiliation unknown1
Rosmidah RosmidahAffiliation unknown1
Bustanuddin BustanuddinAffiliation unknown1
Rina NurhalizaAffiliation unknown1
Meli Indah SariAffiliation unknown1
Dimas PangestuAffiliation unknown1
Ramon Azmi PratamaAffiliation unknown1
Nys. ArfaAffiliation unknown1
Ussi Astika AnggraeniAffiliation unknown1
M. Hadhri NurAffiliation unknown1
Yolla Fitri AmiliaAffiliation unknown1
Moch. Reza Restu PrihatmajaAffiliation unknown1
Rizky AmaliaAffiliation unknown1
Adinda Farah AnisyaAffiliation unknown1
Erwin ErwinAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Zhafran RahmanAffiliation unknown1
Mohamad RafiqAffiliation unknown1
Andreas AgungAffiliation unknown1
Erwin ErwinAffiliation unknown1
Adrienne Dwi SyahfiradellaAffiliation unknown1
Sulistiani SulistianiAffiliation unknown1
Lukas Permadi Orlando BeremandaAffiliation unknown1
Reyanda Muzhaqin PutraAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/Pampas/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Penerapan Pidana Denda terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Memperniagakan Satwa Dilindungi di Pengadilan Negeri Jambi</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Utary, Sisi Delica</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hafrida, Hafrida</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Wahyudi, Dheny</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Pelaku</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Pidana Denda</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Satwa yang Dilindungi</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Criminal Fines</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Offenders</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Protected Animals</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The use of fine categories is intended to provide a clear pattern for the highest sanctions set for various offenses, in this case offenses against protected animals. Protected animals are animals that are protected by the government. The decision of Jambi District Court Judge is considered to have exceeded the maximum penalty provided for in Article 40 (2) Law Number 5 of 1990 concerning Conservation of Natural Resources and Ecosystems, so that it becomes Article 65 (2) KUHP. The problem discussed in this work is how the judge uses legal considerations in imposing a fine exceeding the maximum limit the amount of the verdict and the judge's consideration in imposing a fine exceeding the maximum pada Putusan Nomor: 401/Pid.Sus.LH/2021/PN Jmb. The research was conducted using a prescriptive legal approach. Data collection was carried out by means of literatures study. This research resulted in conclusions. That is, the judge's decision is considered to exceed the maximum criminal limit of Article 40 (2) &amp;nbsp;Law Number 5 of 1990. Based on the conclusions, it’s recommended that prosecutors be more careful in determining the punishment and be more specific in preparing the prosecution. The need to change the criminal provisions in the judge's decision.
Abstrak
Tujuan penggunaan kategori denda adalah untuk memiliki pedoman yang jelas mengenai jumlah denda maksimal yang dapat dikenakan untuk berbagai jenis tindak pidana, seperti dalam kasus tindak pidana terhadap satwa yang dilindungi. Satwa yang dilindungi adalah satwa yang mendapatkan perlindungan dari pemerintah. Putusan hakim dari Pengadilan Negeri Jambi dianggap melampaui batas maksimum pidana denda yang ditetapkan dalam Pasal 40 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1990 tentang Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Hayati dan Ekosistemnya, sehingga bertentangan dengan Pasal 65 ayat (2) KUHP. Fokus dari skripsi ini adalah untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hukum yang digunakan oleh hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana denda yang melebihi batas maksimum, serta melakukan analisis hukum terhadap pertimbangan hakim dalam kasus Putusan Nomor: 401/Pid.Sus.LH/2021/PN Jmb. Penelitian ini dilakukan melalui pendekatan yuridis normatif dan pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa Putusan hakim tersebut melewati batas pidana denda maksimum yang ditetapkan dalam Pasal 40 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1990 tentang Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Dan Ekosistem. Berdasarkan kesimpulan ini, disarankan agar Jaksa Penuntut Umum lebih teliti dalam menetapkan ketentuan pidana dan menyusun surat dakwaan dengan tepat. Juga diperlukan revisi terhadap ketentuan pidana dalam Putusan hakim yang melampaui batas maksimum pidana denda tersebut.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-03-05</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Pampas/article/view/31809</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/pampas.v5i1.31809</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024); 25-37</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-8325</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-7205</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Pampas/article/view/31809/17621</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Sisi Delica Utary, Hafrida, Dheny Wahyudi</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>