Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Pemidanaan Atas Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Pejabat Publik di Indonesia (Sebuah Tinjauan Kriminologi)

PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law · Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025) · pp. 16–28

DOI
10.22437/pampas.v6i1.35176
ISSN
2721-8325, 2721-7205
Published
2025-02-27
Publisher
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

Corruption has long been a problem that is very difficult to eradicate and has now developed into something more complex because of the increasing modus operandi used by corrupt actors. In overcoming this, the government's commitment is needed to make formulations that can deter corruptors. This article discusses the factors that influence public officials to commit corruption and how the influence of social control in controlling this phenomenon. This research method uses the Normative Juridical Research Method, with the Research Specification used is the Legislative Approach. The data source used is secondary data which consists of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Data Collection Techniques are Literature Study, Documents Study, and Interview Result. The results showed that the punishment carried out against public officials has not been able to provide a deterrent effect to the perpetrators due to the relatively low penalty and the absence of commitment of law enforcers to provide maximum punishment. Other findings also show a correlation of how community social control has a big influence in influencing law enforcement against corruption even though it has not been done optimally. Abstrak Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Pemidanaan Terhadap Pejabat Publik Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Perspektif Kriminologi serta Pengaruh Kontrol Sosial Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Terkait Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Pejabat Publik. Metode Penelitian ini menggunakan Metode Penelitian Yuridis Normatif, dengan Spesifikasi Penelitian yang digunakan adalah Pendekatan Perundang-Undangan. Sumber Data yang digunakan adalah Data Sekunder yang di dalamnya terdiri dari Bahan Hukum Primer, Sekunder, dan Tersier. Teknik Pengumpulan Data adalah Studi Pustaka dan Studi Dokumen. Hasil Penelitian yang diperoleh yaitu pemidanaan terhadap Pejabat Publik yang melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia belum dilakukan secara maksimal karena belum pernah ada pidana mati yang dijatuhkan walaupun opsi mengenai penjatuhan pidana mati telah diatur secara jelas dalam Undang Undang, serta pembayaran denda dan uang pengganti akibat dari korupsi yang jumlahnya jauh lebih sedikit dari jumlah kerugian yang ditanggung oleh negara. Selain itu juga Kontrol Sosial Masyarakat terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Koruptor masih tergolong sangat rendah.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 71 co-authorship links · 8 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Hasanuddin University
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Universitas Muslim Buton
  • Indonesia University of Education
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Bambang WidarsonoAffiliation unknown3
Heru AtmokoAffiliation unknown3
Aan AsphiantoAffiliation unknown2
Khairan ARUniversitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry2
Mira MaisuraAffiliation unknown2
Mujamilah MujamilahAffiliation unknown2
Kosasih KosasihAffiliation unknown2
Aulia Syarif AzizAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad IchsanAffiliation unknown1
Aminur AminurUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Abd. Rahman KadirUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Makkarennu MakkarennuHasanuddin University1
Sri wahyuni HarisHasanuddin University1
Hibnu NugrohoAffiliation unknown1
Austin Al HarizAffiliation unknown1
Ma'ruf Pambudi NurwantaraAffiliation unknown1
Farchan Arif RosadiAffiliation unknown1
Kania Mulia UtamiAffiliation unknown1
Aliyth PrakarsaAffiliation unknown1
Anas Aditya WijanarkoAffiliation unknown1
Ahmad Ghifari AlhasaniAffiliation unknown1
Reine RofianaAffiliation unknown1
Salsabila Oktaria MirajAffiliation unknown1
La Ode KaharudinUniversitas Muslim Buton1
Dewi Asriani RidzalUniversitas Muslim Buton1
Haswan HaswanAffiliation unknown1
Veni RosnawatiAffiliation unknown1
Yandi YandiAffiliation unknown1
Ari WidodoIndonesia University of Education1
Amprasto AmprastoAffiliation unknown1
Cici Nur AzizahAffiliation unknown1
Riandi RiandiIndonesia University of Education1
Novita RestiAffiliation unknown1
Rizka Trian PalupyAffiliation unknown1
Atika WirdasariAffiliation unknown1
Huda HudaAffiliation unknown1
Sarina SarinaUniversitas Muhammadiyah Parepare1
Nensilianti NensiliantiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/Pampas/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Pemidanaan Atas Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Pejabat Publik di Indonesia (Sebuah Tinjauan Kriminologi)</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Dwiantari, Rinni</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ridwan, Ridwan</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Korupsi</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Pejabat Publik</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Pemidanaan</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Corruption</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Public Official</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Punishment</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Corruption has long been a problem that is very difficult to eradicate and has now developed into something more complex because of the increasing modus operandi used by corrupt actors. In overcoming this, the government's commitment is needed to make formulations that can deter corruptors. This article discusses the factors that influence public officials to commit corruption and how the influence of social control in controlling this phenomenon. This research method uses the Normative Juridical Research Method, with the Research Specification used is the Legislative Approach. The data source used is secondary data which consists of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Data Collection Techniques are Literature Study, Documents Study, and Interview Result. The results showed that the punishment carried out against public officials has not been able to provide a deterrent effect to the perpetrators due to the relatively low penalty and the absence of commitment of law enforcers to provide maximum punishment. Other findings also show a correlation of how community social control has a big influence in influencing law enforcement against corruption even though it has not been done optimally.
Abstrak
Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Pemidanaan Terhadap Pejabat Publik Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Perspektif Kriminologi serta Pengaruh Kontrol Sosial Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Terkait Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Pejabat Publik. Metode Penelitian ini menggunakan Metode Penelitian Yuridis Normatif, dengan Spesifikasi Penelitian yang digunakan adalah Pendekatan Perundang-Undangan. Sumber Data yang digunakan adalah Data Sekunder yang di dalamnya terdiri dari Bahan Hukum Primer, Sekunder, dan Tersier. Teknik Pengumpulan Data adalah Studi Pustaka dan Studi Dokumen. Hasil Penelitian yang diperoleh yaitu pemidanaan terhadap Pejabat Publik yang melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia belum dilakukan secara maksimal karena belum pernah ada pidana mati yang dijatuhkan walaupun opsi mengenai penjatuhan pidana mati telah diatur secara jelas dalam Undang Undang, serta pembayaran denda dan uang pengganti akibat dari korupsi yang jumlahnya jauh lebih sedikit dari jumlah kerugian yang ditanggung oleh negara. Selain itu juga Kontrol Sosial Masyarakat terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Koruptor masih tergolong sangat rendah.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-02-27</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Pampas/article/view/35176</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/pampas.v6i1.35176</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025); 16-28</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-8325</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-7205</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Pampas/article/view/35176/20097</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Rinni Dwiantari, Ridwan</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>