Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

From Conservation to Commodification? A Comparative Analysis of Quota-Based Fisheries Governance in Indonesia, Iceland, and New Zealand

Dari Konservasi ke Komodifikasi? Analisis Komparatif Tata Kelola Perikanan Berbasis Kuota di Indonesia, Islandia, dan Selandia Baru

Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law · Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026) · pp. 420–448

DOI
10.22437/12a0dn73
ISSN
2721-8333, 2721-8031
Published
2026-09-22
Publisher
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

English

Background: Quota-based fisheries management aims to reconcile stock conservation with efficient access, yet harvesting entitlements may evolve from public allocations into asset-like interests. International lawof the Sea provides conservation frameworks but does not mandate private rights or quota markets. MethodologyThis research employs a qualitative doctrinal-comparative design, combining doctrinal interpretation, content analysis, comparative matrices, and process tracing across UNCLOS 1982, UNFSA 1995, national legislation, policy documents, and literature. Objectives: This study examines how international obligations and domestic legal choices regulate the transformation of harvesting rights from conservation instruments into commodity-like economic interests in Indonesia, Iceland, and New Zealand, and identifies regulatory safeguards for Indonesia's Measured Fishing Policy. Findings: UNCLOS and UNFSA require science-based conservation, precaution, cooperation, monitoring, and adaptive adjustment, but do not mandate private ownership, transferability, or quota markets. Commodification develops cumulatively through domestic choices concerning exclusivity, security, duration, divisibility, leasing, transferability, capitalisation, and concentration. Iceland and New Zealand demonstrate stronger legal and market commodification while retaining formal public authority over catch limits. Indonesia remains closer to an administrative allocation model, although unequal access to capital, information, infrastructure, contracts, and bureaucratic capacity may generate functional commodification. The Conservation-Commodification Continuum framework shows that each country's position depends on the balance between rights strength, market intensity, access and rent distribution, and State corrective capacity. Originality/Novelty: This research develops the Conservation-Commodification Continuum as a multidimensional diagnostic framework integrating international law, property-rights analysis, common-pool resource governance, and Blue Justice. Its theoretical contribution connects international normative dimensions with domestic institutional choices and distributive effects. Its practical contribution formulates conditional, reviewable, transparent, and socially protective regulatory safeguards for Indonesia's Measured Fishing Policy.

Indonesian

Latar Belakang: Perikanan tangkap menghadapi tantangan serius akibat eksploitasi berlebih yang mendorong berbagai negara mengadopsi sistem pengelolaan berbasis kuota. Meskipun sistem ini dirancang untuk mendukung keberlanjutan sumber daya, perkembangan hak penangkapan yang semakin dapat diperdagangkan memunculkan perdebatan mengenai komodifikasi sumber daya perikanan dan implikasinya terhadap keadilan akses. Metodologi: Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif komparatif berbasis data sekunder melalui analisis kebijakan, process tracing, dan analisis tematik terhadap regulasi, dokumen kebijakan, laporan internasional, serta literatur akademik terkait. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis evolusi tata kelola perikanan berbasis kuota di Indonesia, Islandia, dan Selandia Baru serta menjelaskan bagaimana sistem kuota bergerak dari instrumen konservasi menuju mekanisme yang semakin dipengaruhi logika pasar. Temuan: Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa evolusi sistem kuota ditentukan oleh interaksi antara penguatan hak kepemilikan, tingkat transferabilitas kuota, dominasi mekanisme pasar, dan perlindungan terhadap keadilan sosial. Sistem kuota terbukti meningkatkan efektivitas konservasi dan efisiensi ekonomi, tetapi juga berpotensi mendorong konsentrasi hak akses dan akumulasi rente pada aktor tertentu. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa konservasi dan komodifikasi berkembang secara simultan dalam suatu spektrum kelembagaan. Orisinalitas/Keunikan: Originalitas penelitian terletak pada pengembangan model Conservation–Commodification Continuum yang menjelaskan variasi lintasan evolusi rezim kuota. Secara teoritis, penelitian ini mengintegrasikan perspektif sumber daya milik bersama, hak kepemilikan, ekonomi politik sumber daya alam, dan keadilan biru dalam satu kerangka analitis. Secara praktis, penelitian ini menyediakan dasar konseptual untuk menilai arah implementasi Penangkapan Ikan Terukur di Indonesia.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 93 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Sebelas Maret University
  • Hasanuddin University
  • Thammasat University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Fatma Ulfatun NajichaAffiliation unknown5
Hartiwiningsih HartiwiningsihAffiliation unknown4
Ravi DanendraAffiliation unknown4
Zaidah Nur RosidahAffiliation unknown3
Abdul Kadir JaelaniAffiliation unknown3
Willy Naresta HanumAffiliation unknown3
Muhammad Ainurrasyid Al FikriAffiliation unknown2
Jaco BarkhuizenAffiliation unknown2
Sulistyanta SulistyantaAffiliation unknown2
Abdul WahidHasanuddin University2
Ilham Aji PangestuAffiliation unknown2
Nuralievich RuzinazarovAffiliation unknown2
Hilaire TegnanAffiliation unknown2
Fauzi IswariAffiliation unknown2
Adi SulistiyonoSebelas Maret University2
Muhammad Ainurrasyid Al FikriAffiliation unknown1
Sultoni FikriAffiliation unknown1
Agus RiwantoAffiliation unknown1
Imranullah AkhtarAffiliation unknown1
Sapto HermawanAffiliation unknown1
Shubhan Noor HidayatAffiliation unknown1
Thesalonika Vega Puspa AgathaAffiliation unknown1
Maria Pricilia SilvianaAffiliation unknown1
HartiwiningsihAffiliation unknown1
Aji RahmadiAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Jihadul HayatAffiliation unknown1
Henning GlaserThammasat University1
Muhammad RustamajiAffiliation unknown1
Zico Junius FernandoAffiliation unknown1
Firdaus ArifinAffiliation unknown1
Erwan Adi PriyonoAffiliation unknown1
Nabila Rahma SafitriAffiliation unknown1
Chandra Dewi Puspita SariAffiliation unknown1
Ruly Isfatul KhasanahAffiliation unknown1
Dwi RosalinaAffiliation unknown1
A Nurtasya WahdaAffiliation unknown1
Katarina Hesty RombeAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/Utipossidetis/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">From Conservation to Commodification? A Comparative Analysis of Quota-Based Fisheries Governance in Indonesia, Iceland, and New Zealand </dc:title>
	<dc:title xml:lang="id">Dari Konservasi ke Komodifikasi? Analisis Komparatif Tata Kelola Perikanan Berbasis Kuota di Indonesia, Islandia, dan Selandia Baru</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Arafat, Yasser</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Handayani, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Karjoko, Lego</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">blue justice</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">harvesting entitlements</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">measured fishing policy</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">coastal-state authority</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">regulatory safeguards.</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id">Hak Akses Sumber Daya</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id">Transferabilitas Kuota</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id">Keadilan Distributif</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id">Komodifikasi Sumber Daya;</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id">Ekonomi Biru</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Background: Quota-based fisheries management aims to reconcile stock conservation with efficient access, yet harvesting entitlements may evolve from public allocations into asset-like interests. International lawof the Sea provides conservation frameworks but does not mandate private rights or quota markets. MethodologyThis research employs a qualitative doctrinal-comparative design, combining doctrinal interpretation, content analysis, comparative matrices, and process tracing across UNCLOS 1982, UNFSA 1995, national legislation, policy documents, and literature. Objectives: This study examines how international obligations and domestic legal choices regulate the transformation of harvesting rights from conservation instruments into commodity-like economic interests in Indonesia, Iceland, and New Zealand, and identifies regulatory safeguards for Indonesia's Measured Fishing Policy.  Findings: UNCLOS and UNFSA require science-based conservation, precaution, cooperation, monitoring, and adaptive adjustment, but do not mandate private ownership, transferability, or quota markets. Commodification develops cumulatively through domestic choices concerning exclusivity, security, duration, divisibility, leasing, transferability, capitalisation, and concentration. Iceland and New Zealand demonstrate stronger legal and market commodification while retaining formal public authority over catch limits. Indonesia remains closer to an administrative allocation model, although unequal access to capital, information, infrastructure, contracts, and bureaucratic capacity may generate functional commodification. The Conservation-Commodification Continuum framework shows that each country's position depends on the balance between rights strength, market intensity, access and rent distribution, and State corrective capacity. Originality/Novelty: This research develops the Conservation-Commodification Continuum as a multidimensional diagnostic framework integrating international law, property-rights analysis, common-pool resource governance, and Blue Justice. Its theoretical contribution connects international normative dimensions with domestic institutional choices and distributive effects. Its practical contribution formulates conditional, reviewable, transparent, and socially protective regulatory safeguards for Indonesia's Measured Fishing Policy.</dc:description>
	<dc:description xml:lang="id">Latar Belakang: Perikanan tangkap menghadapi tantangan serius akibat eksploitasi berlebih yang mendorong berbagai negara mengadopsi sistem pengelolaan berbasis kuota. Meskipun sistem ini dirancang untuk mendukung keberlanjutan sumber daya, perkembangan hak penangkapan yang semakin dapat diperdagangkan memunculkan perdebatan mengenai komodifikasi sumber daya perikanan dan implikasinya terhadap keadilan akses. Metodologi: Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif komparatif berbasis data sekunder melalui analisis kebijakan, process tracing, dan analisis tematik terhadap regulasi, dokumen kebijakan, laporan internasional, serta literatur akademik terkait. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis evolusi tata kelola perikanan berbasis kuota di Indonesia, Islandia, dan Selandia Baru serta menjelaskan bagaimana sistem kuota bergerak dari instrumen konservasi menuju mekanisme yang semakin dipengaruhi logika pasar. Temuan: Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa evolusi sistem kuota ditentukan oleh interaksi antara penguatan hak kepemilikan, tingkat transferabilitas kuota, dominasi mekanisme pasar, dan perlindungan terhadap keadilan sosial. Sistem kuota terbukti meningkatkan efektivitas konservasi dan efisiensi ekonomi, tetapi juga berpotensi mendorong konsentrasi hak akses dan akumulasi rente pada aktor tertentu. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa konservasi dan komodifikasi berkembang secara simultan dalam suatu spektrum kelembagaan. Orisinalitas/Keunikan: Originalitas penelitian terletak pada pengembangan model Conservation–Commodification Continuum yang menjelaskan variasi lintasan evolusi rezim kuota. Secara teoritis, penelitian ini mengintegrasikan perspektif sumber daya milik bersama, hak kepemilikan, ekonomi politik sumber daya alam, dan keadilan biru dalam satu kerangka analitis. Secara praktis, penelitian ini menyediakan dasar konseptual untuk menilai arah implementasi Penangkapan Ikan Terukur di Indonesia.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-09-22</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Utipossidetis/article/view/57367</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/12a0dn73</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Oktober; 420-448</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law; Vol 7 No 3 (2026): Oktober; 420-448</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-8333</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-8031</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Utipossidetis/article/view/57367/25701</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Yasser Arafat, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani, Lego Karjoko</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>