Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Pengaturan Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia dalam Perspektif Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia

Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law · Vol. 1 No. 3 (2020) · pp. 413–430

DOI
10.22437/zaaken.v1i3.11070
ISSN
2721-5318, 2721-8759
Published
2020-11-20
Publisher
Universitas Jambi, Fakultas Hukum
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

This study aims to 1) indentify and analiyze the arrangement of copyright forms as objects of the foundationary guarantee; 2) to find out and analyze the copyright execution arrangements of the debt breaks promises/defaults. As for the formulation of problems that will be studied regarding 1) what form of copyright can be used as an object of the dictionary guarantee; 2) how do the copyright execution arrangements of the debt defaut/breaks his promise. The research method used is a normal judicial research type. The result show that 1) the foundational guarantee of copyright has not been specifically regulated how it’s implementation and the current regulations are only limited to being the norm in law without any implementing regulations until now, because law 42 of 1999 only regulates fiduciary with the guarantee of a tangible movable object. 2) copyright as an object of fiduciary guarantee raises legal problems in the future when the debitor is in default, execution will be difficult because copyright is an intangible object and  there is no appraisal institution that interprets the value of copyright. Keywords: copyrights, fiduciary guarantee.  Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk 1) untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pengaturan bentuk hak cipta sebagai objek jaminan fidusia; 2) untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pengaturan eksekusi hak cipta apabila debitur ingkar janji/ wanprestasi. Adapun perumusan masalah yang akan dikaji mengenai 1) bagaimana bentuk hak cipta yang dapat dijadikan sebagai objek jaminan fidusia; 2) bagaimana pengaturan eksekusi hak cipta apabila debitur wanprestasi/ingkar janji. metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah tipe penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa 1) pengaturan Jaminan fidusia terhadap hak cipta belum diatur secara khusus bagaimana pelaksanaanya dan peraturan yang ada saat ini hanya sebatas menjadi norma dalam undang-undang tanpa ada pengaturan pelaksana sampai sekarang, karena undang-undang 42 Tahun 1999 hanya mengatur tentang fidusia dengan jaminan benda bergerak yang berwujud 2) hak cipta sebagai objek jaminan fidusia menimbulkan problematika hukum kedepannya manakala debitur cidera janji/wanprestasi, eksekusi akan sulit dilakukan karena hak cipta termasuk benda yang tidak berwujud dan belum ada lembaga aprasial yang menafsirkan nilai dari hak cipta. Kata kunci: hak cipta; jaminan fidusia;

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

36 authors · 90 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Hasanuddin University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Taufik YahyaAffiliation unknown4
Muskibah MuskibahAffiliation unknown3
Diana AmirAffiliation unknown3
Sasmiar SasmiarAffiliation unknown2
Dwi SuryahartatiAffiliation unknown2
Pahlefi PahlefiAffiliation unknown2
Rafi SaputraAffiliation unknown2
Hartati HartatiInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Iskandar ZulkarnainAffiliation unknown1
Siti KunartiAffiliation unknown1
Raja Sharah FatriciaAffiliation unknown1
Amarru Muftie HolishAffiliation unknown1
Lili NailiAffiliation unknown1
Syamsir SyamsirHasanuddin University1
Elita RahmiAffiliation unknown1
Romavita RomavitaAffiliation unknown1
Umar HasanAffiliation unknown1
Prayogi YulistiAffiliation unknown1
Annisa ErtanandaAffiliation unknown1
Dion PandiaAffiliation unknown1
Feny AdistiAffiliation unknown1
Faradiba MivtahurAffiliation unknown1
Sari RahayuAffiliation unknown1
Herlin NoviyantiAffiliation unknown1
Salsabila Nauli MalauAffiliation unknown1
Suhermi SuhermiAffiliation unknown1
Viona Tri AntisyaAffiliation unknown1
viona tri antisyaAffiliation unknown1
Novianti NoviantiAffiliation unknown1
Indriya FathniAffiliation unknown1
Khavy ArsyadiAffiliation unknown1
Beny SaputraAffiliation unknown1
Meri YarniAffiliation unknown1
Adeb Davega PrasnaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/Zaaken/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Pengaturan Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia dalam Perspektif Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Natalina Br Ginting, Erika</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Yetniwati, Yetniwati</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">hak cipta; </dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">jaminan fidusia;</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study aims to 1) indentify and analiyze the arrangement of copyright forms as objects of the foundationary guarantee; 2) to find out and analyze the copyright execution arrangements of the debt breaks promises/defaults.  As for the formulation of problems that will be studied regarding 1) what form of copyright can be used as an object of the dictionary guarantee; 2) how do the copyright execution arrangements of the debt defaut/breaks his promise. The research method used is a normal judicial research type. The result show that 1) the foundational guarantee of copyright has not been specifically regulated how it’s implementation and the current regulations are only limited to being the norm in law without any implementing regulations until now, because law 42 of 1999 only regulates fiduciary with the guarantee of a tangible movable object. 2) copyright as an object of fiduciary guarantee raises legal problems in the future when the debitor is in default, execution will be difficult because copyright is an intangible object and  there is no appraisal institution that interprets the value of copyright.
Keywords : copyrights, fiduciary guarantee.
 
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk 1) untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pengaturan bentuk hak cipta sebagai objek jaminan fidusia; 2) untuk  mengetahui dan menganalisis pengaturan eksekusi hak cipta apabila debitur ingkar janji/ wanprestasi. Adapun perumusan masalah yang akan dikaji mengenai 1) bagaimana bentuk hak cipta yang dapat dijadikan sebagai objek jaminan fidusia; 2) bagaimana pengaturan eksekusi hak cipta apabila debitur wanprestasi/ingkar janji. metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah tipe penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa 1) pengaturan Jaminan fidusia terhadap hak cipta belum diatur secara khusus bagaimana pelaksanaanya dan peraturan yang ada saat ini hanya sebatas menjadi norma dalam undang-undang tanpa ada pengaturan pelaksana sampai sekarang, karena undang-undang 42 Tahun 1999 hanya mengatur tentang fidusia dengan jaminan benda bergerak yang berwujud 2) hak cipta sebagai objek jaminan fidusia menimbulkan problematika hukum kedepannya manakala debitur cidera janji/wanprestasi, eksekusi akan sulit dilakukan karena hak cipta termasuk benda yang tidak berwujud dan belum ada lembaga aprasial yang menafsirkan nilai dari hak cipta.
Kata kunci : hak cipta; jaminan fidusia;</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Jambi, Fakultas Hukum</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-11-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Zaaken/article/view/11070</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/zaaken.v1i3.11070</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law; Vol. 1 No. 3 (2020): Oktober; 413-430</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-5318</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-8759</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.22437/zaaken.v1i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Zaaken/article/view/11070/6677</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2020 Erika Natalina Br Ginting Ginting, Yetniwati Yetniwati</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>