Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Development of Learning Cycle 5E-Based Teaching Tools to Facilitate Students' Conceptual Changes in Mathematics Learning

Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Model Learning Cycle 5E untuk Memfasilitasi Perubahan Konseptual Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika

Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika · Vol. 12 No. 2 (2022) · pp. 88–101

DOI
10.22437/edumatica.v12i02.16933
ISSN
2580-0779, 2088-2157
Published
2022-08-31
Publisher
Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstract

English

This article describes the results of developing Learning Cycle 5E teaching tools that are valid, practical, and effective to facilitate students' conceptual changes in Statistics and Data Presentation material. The Four-D model was used to develop this research. The quality of the product is measured through the validity, practicality, and effectiveness of teaching tools. The device's validity is measured by its relevance and consistency using expert judgment. The device's practicality was measured using a practicality assessment questionnaire, distributed to 5 Mathematics teachers and 20 eighth-grader. Effectiveness was measured through a small group trial involving 1 Mathematics teacher and 28 eighth-grader students. The results showed that the teaching tools developed met the validity, practicality, and effectiveness criteria. Learning tools are declared valid, with the validity score for lesson plans being 0.89, student worksheets being 0.86, teacher book being 0.78, and student book being 0.80. Learning tools are declared practical with a practicality score where the teacher's response is 80.31% in the practical category, and the student's response is 79.19% in the practical category. Furthermore, teaching tools were declared effective with the criteria; the classical average of student learning outcomes reached 83.71, the Learning Completeness Criteria reached 82.14%, the level of teacher learning management was at a Good level, and student activity reached 72.5%.

Indonesian

Artikel ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan hasil pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis Learning Cycle 5E pada kriteria valid, praktis, dan efektif untuk memfasilitasi perubahan konseptual siswa pada materi Statistik dan Penyajian Data. Model Four-D digunakan sebagai pendekatan pengembangan penelitian ini. Kualitas produk diukur melalui validitas, kepraktisan, dan efektivitas perangkat pembelajaran. Validitas perangkat diukur dari relevansi dan konsistensinya menggunakan expert judgement. Praktikalitas perangkat diukur menggunakan kuesioner penilaian praktikalitas kepada 5 orang guru Matematika dan 20 orang siswa kelas VIII. Efektifitas diukur melalui ujicoba kelompok kecil dengan melibatkan 1 orang guru Matematika dan 28 orang siswa kelas VIII. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perangkat pembelajaran yang dikembangkan memenuhi kriteria validitas, praktikalitas, dan efektivitas. Perangkat pembelajaran dinyatakan valid dengan skor validitas untuk RPP adalah 0.89, lembar aktivitas siswa 0.86, buku guru 0.78, dan buku siswa 0.80. Perangkat pembelajaran dinyatakan praktis dengan skor praktikalitas dimana respons guru adalah 80.31% dengan kategori praktis, dan respons siswa adalah 79.19% dengan kategori praktis. Selanjutnya, perangkat pembelajaran dinyatakan efektif dengan kriteria; rata-rata klasikal hasil belajar siswa mencapai 83.71, tingkat ketuntasan belajar mencapai 82.14%, tingkat pengelolaan pembelajaran guru pada taraf baik, dan keaktifan siswa mencapai 72.5%.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 75 co-authorship links · 3 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Abdul HalimInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Dewi AtikahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Sucitra Juliana EmsilInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Waode NurcahyanaAffiliation unknown1
Anggriani FusvitaAffiliation unknown1
irin aprilin janharAffiliation unknown1
Firdayanti FirdayantiAffiliation unknown1
Sernita SernitaAffiliation unknown1
Angriani FusvitaAffiliation unknown1
Bobi AnggriawanAffiliation unknown1
Nur Hasanah SafeiInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Jihan Fatikah RaihanaAffiliation unknown1
Shinta Aprilia Lucki Hidayati MunariAffiliation unknown1
Agung ListiadiAffiliation unknown1
Reza Ayu PalupiAffiliation unknown1
Palupiningdyah PalupiningdyahAffiliation unknown1
Zaenuri ZaenuriState University of Semarang1
Scolastika MarianiState University of Semarang1
Suharyo SuharyoAffiliation unknown1
Mohammad ZulkarnainAffiliation unknown1
Rostika FloraAffiliation unknown1
Yuant TiandhoAffiliation unknown1
Meri HamdiniAffiliation unknown1
Diana Novita SariAffiliation unknown1
Siti FatimahAffiliation unknown1
Kompri KompriAffiliation unknown1
Wulan Anna PertiwiAffiliation unknown1
Tri Kurniati SAffiliation unknown1
Tria Rahma IsnainiAffiliation unknown1
Yunila SukmaAffiliation unknown1
Ignatius Soni KurniawanAffiliation unknown1
Mohammad Ahyar Syafwan IsyanderAffiliation unknown1
Septia WahyuniAffiliation unknown1
Ansor AnsorAffiliation unknown1
Elfi RahmadhaniAffiliation unknown1
Firmansyah BAffiliation unknown1
M. IkhsanUniversitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka1
Safitri SafitriAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/edumatica/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Development of Learning Cycle 5E-Based Teaching Tools to Facilitate Students' Conceptual Changes in Mathematics Learning</dc:title>
	<dc:title xml:lang="id">Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Model Learning Cycle 5E untuk Memfasilitasi Perubahan Konseptual Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Gradini, Ega</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Susanti, Susanti</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Gradini, Ega</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Susanti, Susanti</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">conceptual change</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">learning cycle</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">conceptual understanding</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id">learning cycle 5E</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id">pemahaman konsep</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id">perubahan konseptual</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This article describes the results of developing Learning Cycle 5E teaching tools that are valid, practical, and effective to facilitate students' conceptual changes in Statistics and Data Presentation material. The Four-D model was used to develop this research. The quality of the product is measured through the validity, practicality, and effectiveness of teaching tools. The device's validity is measured by its relevance and consistency using expert judgment. The device's practicality was measured using a practicality assessment questionnaire, distributed to 5 Mathematics teachers and 20 eighth-grader. Effectiveness was measured through a small group trial involving 1 Mathematics teacher and 28 eighth-grader students. The results showed that the teaching tools developed met the validity, practicality, and effectiveness criteria. Learning tools are declared valid, with the validity score for lesson plans being 0.89, student worksheets being 0.86, teacher book being 0.78, and student book being 0.80. Learning tools are declared practical with a practicality score where the teacher's response is 80.31% in the practical category, and the student's response is 79.19% in the practical category. Furthermore, teaching tools were declared effective with the criteria; the classical average of student learning outcomes reached 83.71, the Learning Completeness Criteria reached 82.14%, the level of teacher learning management was at a Good level, and student activity reached 72.5%.</dc:description>
	<dc:description xml:lang="id">Artikel ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan hasil pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis Learning Cycle 5E pada kriteria valid, praktis, dan efektif untuk memfasilitasi perubahan konseptual siswa pada materi Statistik dan Penyajian Data. Model Four-D digunakan sebagai pendekatan pengembangan penelitian ini. Kualitas produk diukur melalui validitas, kepraktisan, dan efektivitas perangkat pembelajaran. Validitas perangkat diukur dari relevansi dan konsistensinya menggunakan expert judgement. Praktikalitas perangkat diukur menggunakan kuesioner penilaian praktikalitas kepada 5 orang guru Matematika dan 20 orang siswa kelas VIII. Efektifitas diukur melalui ujicoba kelompok kecil dengan melibatkan 1 orang guru Matematika dan 28 orang siswa kelas VIII. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perangkat pembelajaran yang dikembangkan memenuhi kriteria validitas, praktikalitas, dan efektivitas. Perangkat pembelajaran dinyatakan valid dengan skor validitas untuk RPP adalah 0.89, lembar aktivitas siswa 0.86, buku guru 0.78, dan buku siswa 0.80. Perangkat pembelajaran dinyatakan praktis dengan skor praktikalitas dimana respons guru adalah 80.31% dengan kategori praktis, dan respons siswa adalah 79.19% dengan kategori praktis. Selanjutnya, perangkat pembelajaran dinyatakan efektif dengan kriteria; rata-rata klasikal hasil belajar siswa mencapai 83.71, tingkat ketuntasan belajar mencapai 82.14%, tingkat pengelolaan pembelajaran guru pada taraf baik, dan keaktifan siswa mencapai 72.5%.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-08-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/edumatica/article/view/16933</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/edumatica.v12i02.16933</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2022): Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (August 2022); 88-101</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika; Vol 12 No 2 (2022): Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika; 88-101</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2580-0779</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2088-2157</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/edumatica/article/view/16933/14111</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2022 Ega Gradini, Susanti Susanti</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>