Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal SINTA 1

Performance numerical evaluation of modified single-ended primary-inductor converter for photovoltaic systems

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 13 No. 4 (2023)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v13i4.pp3720-3732
ISSN
2722-2578, 2088-8708
Published
2023-08-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Single-ended primary-inductor converter (SEPIC) was considered a good alternative to a DC-DC converter for photovoltaic (PV) systems. The SEPIC converter can operate with an input voltage greater or less than the regulated output voltage, or as a step-up or step-down. As a step-up converter, SEPIC boosts PV voltage to specific levels. However, gain limitation and voltage stress continue to reduce the efficiency of conventional SEPIC converters. Because of this, researchers created a modified SEPIC converter to improve performance. In this paper, six modified SEPIC converters were compared and evaluated. To compare fairly, all modified SEPIC converters are non-isolated and use a single switch. Power simulator (PSIM) software was used to simulate each converter with a BISOL BMO-250 PV module and maximum power point tracking (MPPT) P&O controller. The converter with the highest static voltage gain and lowest duty cycle has been identified. It results in up to ten times voltage increment with a 0.8-duty ratio. All topologies have the same voltage stress, with maximum and minimum values of 30.1 and 29.5 V, respectively. On the other hand, each topology produces different average efficiencies, with the highest and lowest efficiency at 99.5% and 97.2%, respectively.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 100 co-authorship links · 30 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • University of Technology Malaysia
  • Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
  • Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Lampung University
  • Islamic Azad University, Tehran
  • Universiti Malaysia Perlis
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia
  • Other organisations
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Auzani JidinUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka35
Mohammad JannatiUniversity of Technology Malaysia23
Mohd Junaidi Abdul AzizUniversity of Technology Malaysia20
Mohd Hatta JopriUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka15
Awang JusohUniversity of Technology Malaysia15
Nik Rumzi Nik IdrisAffiliation unknown14
Mustafa ManapUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka10
Kasrul Abdul KarimAffiliation unknown9
Lina HandayaniUniversitas Ahmad Dahlan8
Mohamed SalemUniversiti Sains Malaysia8
Mahmoud ZadehbagheriIslamic Azad University, Tehran8
Abdul Rahim AbdullahUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka6
Mochammad FactaDiponegoro University6
Mohammad Javad KianiIslamic Azad University, Tehran5
Shahreen KasimAffiliation unknown5
Watra ArsadiandoAffiliation unknown5
Mohammad Faridun Naim TajuddinUniversiti Malaysia Perlis5
Mohd Junaidi Abdul AzizAffiliation unknown5
Imam Much Ibnu SubrotoSultan Agung Islamic University4
M. Rahimi YusoffUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka4
Herri GusmediLampung University4
Muhammad AdoUniversity of Technology Malaysia4
Hendril Satrian PurnamaAffiliation unknown4
Anggit PamungkasAffiliation unknown4
Vahdat NazerianUniversity of Mazandaran4
Muhammad Zaid AihsanUniversiti Malaysia Perlis4
Chibuike Peter OhanuUniversity of Nigeria4
Apriansyah WibowoAffiliation unknown4
Deswal WaskitoAffiliation unknown4
Tri WahonoAffiliation unknown4
Rahim IldarabadiAffiliation unknown4
Azralmukmin AzmiAffiliation unknown4
Shahrin Md AyobAffiliation unknown4
Siti Azura Ahmad TarusanAffiliation unknown4
Ibrahim AlhamrouniAffiliation unknown4
Aiman Zakwan JidinAffiliation unknown4

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Oct 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Performance numerical evaluation of modified single-ended primary-inductor converter for photovoltaic systems</dc:title><dc:creator>Sutikno, Tole</dc:creator><dc:creator>Aprilianto, Rizky Ajie</dc:creator><dc:creator>Nik Idris, Nik Rumzi</dc:creator><dc:creator>Samosir, Ahmad Saudi</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;&amp;lt;span lang="EN-US"&amp;gt;Single-ended primary-inductor converter (SEPIC) was considered a good alternative to a DC-DC converter for photovoltaic (PV) systems. The SEPIC converter can operate with an input voltage greater or less than the regulated output voltage, or as a step-up or step-down. As a step-up converter, SEPIC boosts PV voltage to specific levels. However, gain limitation and voltage stress continue to reduce the efficiency of conventional SEPIC converters. Because of this, researchers created a modified SEPIC converter to improve performance. In this paper, six modified SEPIC converters were compared and evaluated. To compare fairly, all modified SEPIC converters are non-isolated and use a single switch. Power simulator (PSIM) software was used to simulate each converter with a BISOL BMO-250 PV module and maximum power point tracking (MPPT) P&amp;amp;amp;O controller. The converter with the highest static voltage gain and lowest duty cycle has been identified. It results in up to ten times voltage increment with a 0.8-duty ratio. All topologies have the same voltage stress, with maximum and minimum values of 30.1 and 29.5 V, respectively. On the other hand, each topology produces different average efficiencies, with the highest and lowest efficiency at 99.5% and 97.2%, respectively.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2023-08-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v13i4.pp3720-3732</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v13i4.pp3720-3732</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 13 No 4 (2023); 3720</dc:source><dc:source>2722-2578</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/30948/16757</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>