Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Evaluating an EFL Textbook: A Good Fit, Adequate Fit, a Poor Fit or Totally Wrong?

Indonesian Research Journal in Education |IRJE| · Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023)

DOI
10.22437/irje.v7i2.27610
ISSN
2580-5711
Published
2023-12-31
Publisher
Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate an evaluation of an EFL textbook for senior high school students entitled “Functional English for Senior High Schools” written by Sugeng and Zaimah (2007). The book was published in 2007 by Tiga Serangkai Pustaka Mandiri, Solo. The researchers used a qualitative evaluation checklist, namely “Evaluation of the Fit” by Byrd et al. (2001) by evaluating the fitness of textbooks through three aspects: curriculum, students, and teachers. The evaluation results are: (1) considering the curriculum aspect, the book was categorized as a good fit, (2) considering the fitness of the book with the students’ needs. It was categorized as a good and adequate fit. However, (3) considering the teachers’ aspect, the book was considered a poor fit because it was not completed with supplementary teaching materials, such as cassettes or CDs and manual supports for teachers. The conclusion showed the textbook was categorized as an adequate fit for the curriculum, students, and teachers, and it needed manual and technological support for a more beneficial function.

Collaboration network of the authors

5 authors · 6 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Siti Fatimah AzzahraAffiliation unknown2
Neisya NeisyaAffiliation unknown1
Anita AnitaUniversitas Halu Oleo1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/irje/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Evaluating an EFL Textbook: A Good Fit, Adequate Fit, a Poor Fit or Totally Wrong?</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Aprilia, Fitria</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Neisya</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This research aimed to investigate an evaluation of an EFL textbook for senior high school students entitled “Functional English for Senior High Schools” written by Sugeng and Zaimah (2007). The book was published in 2007 by Tiga Serangkai Pustaka Mandiri, Solo. The researchers used a qualitative evaluation checklist, namely “Evaluation of the Fit” by Byrd et al. (2001) by evaluating the fitness of textbooks through three aspects: curriculum, students, and teachers. The evaluation results are: (1) considering the curriculum aspect, the book was categorized as a good fit, (2) considering the fitness of the book with the students’ needs. It was categorized as a good and adequate fit. However, (3) considering the teachers’ aspect, the book was considered a poor fit because it was not completed with supplementary teaching materials, such as cassettes or CDs and manual supports for teachers. The conclusion showed the textbook was categorized as an adequate fit for the curriculum, students, and teachers, and it needed manual and technological support for a more beneficial function.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Jambi, Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-12-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/irje/article/view/27610</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/irje.v7i2.27610</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Indonesian Research Journal in Education |IRJE|; Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023):  IRJE |Indonesian Research Journal in Education; 487 –499</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2580-5711</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/irje/article/view/27610/17455</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Indonesian Research Journal in Education |IRJE|</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>