Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Assessment Instruments for Interprofessional Education and Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: A Narrative Review and Analysis of the Need for New Assessment Instruments

Jambi Medical Journal : Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan · Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026) · pp. 152–161

DOI
10.22437/9n8sat65
ISSN
2580-6874, 2339-269X
Published
2026-10-29
Publisher
FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN DAN ILMU KESEHATAN UNIVERSITAS JAMBI
Language
en

Abstract

Background: Assessment instruments in interprofessional education (IPE) and interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) address diverse constructs. This review examined their characteristics and relevance to faculty readiness for IPE facilitation. Method: This narrative review used focused, non-systematic search of Pubmed and the Journal of Interprofessional Care. Relevant instrument studies and faculty literature were purposively selected, with instrument characteristics and measurement evidence synthesized narratively. Result: Fourteen instrument families addressed attitudes, perceptions, and professional socialization; self-reported collaborative competence; and collaboration in clinical settings. Measurement evidence varied across versions and populations. Instrument comparisons and faculty development literature infromed five candidate domains: understanding IPE; motivation and commitment; pedagogical facilitation; collaborative role modelling; and confidence and perceived preparedness. Conclusion: The proposed domains provide a conceptual basis for assessing faculty readiness and require validation. Existing facilitator-focused measures should be examined for content coverage and potential adaptation before developing a new instrument

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 194 co-authorship links · 14 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Jambi
  • Gunma University
  • Padjadjaran University
  • Hasanuddin University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Citra MaharaniAffiliation unknown38
Rina Nofri EnisAffiliation unknown38
Erny KusdiyahAffiliation unknown30
Susan TarawifaAffiliation unknown21
Wahyu Indah Dewi AuroraAffiliation unknown14
Rita HalimAffiliation unknown13
Tengku Arief Buana PerkasaAffiliation unknown10
ELFIANI ELFIANIAffiliation unknown9
Ahmad SyauqyAffiliation unknown8
Asro Hayani HarahapAffiliation unknown7
Andi SubandiAffiliation unknown6
Afifah AmatullahAffiliation unknown4
HerlambangAffiliation unknown4
Huntari HarahapAffiliation unknown4
Randy PradityoAffiliation unknown3
Helda RahmasariAffiliation unknown3
Tia Wida Ekaputri HzAffiliation unknown3
Siti RaudhohAffiliation unknown3
Nindya AryantyAffiliation unknown3
Tia Wida EkaputriAffiliation unknown3
Galih PurwoAffiliation unknown2
Nadir Putra Indra TariganAffiliation unknown2
Fairuz FairuzAffiliation unknown2
Charles Apul SimanjuntakAffiliation unknown2
Nys. Natasha Ayu SAffiliation unknown2
Anati PurwakanthiAffiliation unknown2
Nyimas Natasha Ayu SafiraAffiliation unknown2
Budi HandonoPadjadjaran University1
Leri S. FariedGunma University1
Ahmad FarriedGunma University1
Hiroyuki KuwantoGunma University1
Firman Fuad WirakusumahPadjadjaran University1
Asrial AsrialUniversitas Jambi1
Muhammad Salsabeela RusdiHasanuddin University1
Titik HindriatiUniversitas Jambi1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/kedokteran/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Assessment Instruments for Interprofessional Education and Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: A Narrative Review and Analysis of the Need for New Assessment Instruments</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Simbolon, Avrilianti Skolastika</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Fitri, Amelia Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Puspasari, Anggelia</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Shafira, Nyimas Natasha Ayu</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Herlambang, Herlambang</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Review</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Interprofessional education</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Assessment instruments</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Faculty development</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Background: Assessment instruments in interprofessional education (IPE) and interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) address diverse constructs. This review examined their characteristics and relevance to faculty readiness for IPE facilitation.
Method: This narrative review used focused, non-systematic search of Pubmed and the Journal of Interprofessional Care. Relevant instrument studies and faculty literature were purposively selected, with instrument characteristics and measurement evidence synthesized narratively.
Result: Fourteen instrument families addressed attitudes, perceptions, and professional socialization; self-reported collaborative competence; and collaboration in clinical settings. Measurement evidence varied across versions and populations. Instrument comparisons and faculty development literature infromed five candidate domains: understanding IPE; motivation and commitment; pedagogical facilitation; collaborative role modelling; and confidence and perceived preparedness.
Conclusion: The proposed domains provide a conceptual basis for  assessing faculty readiness and require validation. Existing facilitator-focused measures should be examined for content coverage and potential adaptation before developing a new instrument</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN DAN ILMU KESEHATAN UNIVERSITAS JAMBI</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-10-29</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/kedokteran/article/view/60837</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/9n8sat65</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jambi Medical Journal : Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026):  JAMBI MEDICAL JOURNAL: Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan; 152-161</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2580-6874</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2339-269X</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/kedokteran/article/view/60837/25942</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Jambi Medical Journal : Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>