Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

SUBSTITUTION OF AMMONIUM SULFATE FERTILIZER ON UPLAND SUGARCANE CULTIVATION AND ITS EFFECTS ON PLANT GROWTH, NUTRIENT CONTENT AND SOIL CHEMICAL PROPERTIES

AGRIVITA, Journal of Agricultural Science · Vol. 35 No. 1 (2013) · hlm. 36–43

DOI
10.17503/agrivita.v35i1.274
ISSN
2477-8516, 0126-0537
Terbit
2013-03-28
Penerbit
Faculty of Agriculture University of Brawijaya in collaboration with PERAGI
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The aim of this research was to compare the effect of substitution of Ammonium Sulphate (AS) fertilizer on sugarcane growth, nutrient content, and soil chemical properties. This research was conducted on up-land of sugarcane plantation in Tegalweru village, Dau district, Malang regency. This study tested ten treatments consisting of three treatments using AS fertilizer, six treatments using AS substitute fertilizers that used combination of Urea, Gypsum, and bio-compost and one control (no fertilizer). This research used randomized complete block design with three replications. The results showed that the plant growth between the treatment used AS fertilizer and AS substitute was not significantly different. However, the treatment used 400 kg Urea per ha+938 kg Gypsum per ha tended to have the best plant growth and the highest N uptake. For the treatments using AS substitute fertilizer, the higher the application rate was, the higher the soil N and S contents were. The treatments used AS fertilizer due to lower soil pH than AS substitute fertilizer. Based on this research, it can be concluded that the use of alternative fertilizers as a substitute of the AS fertilizer is recommended to reduce an adverse impact on soil fertility.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 131 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • University of Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Sugiyo SugiyoAfiliasi tidak diketahui11
Edy PurwantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Awalya AwalyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Mulawarman MulawarmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Mungin Eddy WibowoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Mungin Eddy WibowoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Muhammad JaparAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Dwi Yuwono Puji SugihartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Dwi Yuwono Puji SugihartoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Venny Indria EkowatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sinta SaraswatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Layyinatus SyifaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Kusnarto KurniawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Slamet Wahyu TriyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muhammad JafarAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Anwar SutoyoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sri Hertanti WulanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Moh. KhasairiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Surdin SurdinUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Andrias AndriasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ali FormenAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lia MustabyiahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amiludin AmiludinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Erin NurcahyoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nailah Rizqia AzharAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lilik Sahal Dzul FahmiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rosmayati RosmayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eko NusantoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Intan PurnamasariUniversity of Singaperbangsa Karawang1
Suharso SuharsoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Christina Dyah PuspaningtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tyas Ayu PrafitriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Catharina Tri AnniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ghaisany ShabrinaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ninik SetyowaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
sinta yuniartiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sonia MardaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://agrivita.ub.ac.id/index.php/agrivita/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">SUBSTITUTION OF AMMONIUM SULFATE FERTILIZER ON UPLAND SUGARCANE CULTIVATION AND ITS EFFECTS ON PLANT GROWTH, NUTRIENT CONTENT AND SOIL CHEMICAL PROPERTIES</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Nurhidayati, Nurhidayati</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Basit, Abdul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sunawan, Sunawan</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US"></dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">AS fertilizer, AS substitute fertilizer, sugarcane, nutrient content, soil chemical properties</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The aim of this research was to compare the effect of substitution of Ammonium Sulphate  (AS) fertilizer on sugarcane growth, nutrient content, and soil chemical properties.  This research was conducted on up-land of sugarcane plantation in Tegalweru village, Dau district, Malang regency. This study tested ten treatments consisting of three treatments using AS fertilizer, six treatments using AS substitute fertilizers that used combination of Urea, Gypsum, and bio-compost and one control (no fertilizer). This research used randomized complete block design with three replications. The results showed that the plant growth between the treatment used AS fertilizer and AS substitute was not significantly different. However, the treatment used 400 kg Urea per ha+938 kg Gypsum per ha tended to have the best plant growth and the highest N uptake. For the treatments using AS substitute fertilizer, the higher the application rate was, the higher the soil N and S contents were.  The treatments used AS fertilizer due to lower soil pH than AS substitute fertilizer. Based on this research, it can be concluded that the use of alternative fertilizers as a substitute of the AS fertilizer is recommended to reduce an adverse impact on soil fertility.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Agriculture University of Brawijaya in collaboration with PERAGI</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2013-03-28</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://agrivita.ub.ac.id/index.php/agrivita/article/view/274</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.17503/agrivita.v35i1.274</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science; Vol 35, No 1 (2013); 36-43</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2477-8516</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0126-0537</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.17503/agrivita.v35i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://agrivita.ub.ac.id/index.php/agrivita/article/view/274/555</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>