Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

DIAGNOSING STUDENTS’ LEARNING DIFFICULTIES IN THE EYES OF INDONESIAN MATHEMATICS TEACHERS

Journal on Mathematics Education · Vol. 10 No. 3 (2019) · hlm. 357–364

DOI
10.22342/jme.10.3.7798.357-364
ISSN
2407-0610, 2087-8885
Terbit
2019-08-17
Penerbit
Indonesian Mathematical Society
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

Teachers’ diagnostic practice on students-difficulties is one of the important steps in designing and managing classroom lessons. The purpose of this study was to explore teachers’ perception and practices regarding diagnosing students’ learning difficulties. The participants of the study were 28 Indonesian mathematics teachers of Junior High School. The data was collected through a Focus Group Discussion and a teacher questionnaire. The data were analyzed qualitatively to describe how the teachers perceive learning difficulties and how the teachers diagnosed students’ learning difficulties. The results of the analysis reveal that the teachers do not yet perform an in-depth diagnosis of students’ difficulties in learning mathematics. The teachers only focus on the mathematics topics and non-mathematical issues, instead of on students’ thinking process. The teachers also do not differentiate the diagnosis, evaluation, and prediction test. With regard to the strategies used by the teachers to diagnose students’ difficulties, analyzing students’ responses to tests was the majority. In this respect, observing students’ learning process during classroom activities is rarely done by the teachers in the purpose of diagnosing students’ learning difficulties. The results of the diagnosis are mainly used as the basis for remedial and drill and practices. The results imply that more support is needed for teachers to improve their competences particularly in diagnosing students’ thinking process difficulties when learning mathematics.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 115 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 38 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Yogyakarta State University
  • State University of Malang
  • University of Bengkulu
  • Aichi University of Education
  • Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University
  • Webster University
  • National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Samsul HadiYogyakarta State University5
Gulzhaina Kuralbayevna KassymovaAbai Kazakh National Pedagogical University3
Edi IstiyonoYogyakarta State University3
Janu ArlinwibowoNational Research and Innovation Agency2
Bayuk NusantaraYogyakarta State University2
Sumaryanto SumaryantoYogyakarta State University2
Rimajon SotlikovaWebster University2
C. Asri BudiningsihYogyakarta State University2
Purwoko Haryadi SantosoUniversitas Sulawesi Barat2
Jailani JailaniYogyakarta State University2
Firdaus Amruzain Satiranandi WibowoYogyakarta State University2
Muhammad Lintang Damar SaktiYogyakarta State University2
Asma’ Khoirunnisa’Yogyakarta State University2
Angella Ananta BatubaraYogyakarta State University2
Miftah Okta BerlianYogyakarta State University2
Zulfa Safina IbrahimYogyakarta State University2
Slamet SuyantoYogyakarta State University2
Badrun KartowagiranYogyakarta State University2
Lantip Diat PrasojoYogyakarta State University1
Yaya Sukjaya KusumahIndonesia University of Education1
Edy Bambang IrawanState University of Malang1
Abdur Rahman As’ariState University of Malang1
Purwanto PurwantoState University of Malang1
Cholis Sa’dijahState University of Malang1
Susiswo SusiswoState University of Malang1
Mujiyem SaptiUniversitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo1
Michiel DoormanUtrecht University1
Elmaini ElmainiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus SusantaUniversity of Bengkulu1
Hari SumardiUniversity of Bengkulu1
Edi SusantoUniversity of Bengkulu1
Novy TrisnaniIKIP PGRI Wates Yogyakarta1
Wuri WuryandaniYogyakarta State University1
Fransiskus Magnis PastorikoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Khristin FabianAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Data ini berasal dari Crossref (yang disetorkan penerbit), karena endpoint OAI-PMH milik jurnal tidak dapat di-harvest.

Sumber metadata: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2407-0610/works, pertama di-harvest 28 Okt 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata sebagai oai_dc, dikonversi dari Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>DIAGNOSING STUDENTS’ LEARNING DIFFICULTIES IN THE EYES OF INDONESIAN MATHEMATICS TEACHERS</dc:title><dc:creator>Wijaya, Ariyadi</dc:creator><dc:creator>Retnawati, Heri</dc:creator><dc:creator>Setyaningrum, Wahyu</dc:creator><dc:creator>Aoyama, Kazuhiro</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sugiman, Sugiman</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Teachers’ diagnostic practice on students-difficulties is one of the important steps in designing and managing classroom lessons. The purpose of this study was to explore teachers’ perception and practices regarding diagnosing students’ learning difficulties. The participants of the study were 28 Indonesian mathematics teachers of Junior High School. The data was collected through a Focus Group Discussion and a teacher questionnaire. The data were analyzed qualitatively to describe how the teachers perceive learning difficulties and how the teachers diagnosed students’ learning difficulties. The results of the analysis reveal that the teachers do not yet perform an in-depth diagnosis of students’ difficulties in learning mathematics. The teachers only focus on the mathematics topics and non-mathematical issues, instead of on students’ thinking process. The teachers also do not differentiate the diagnosis, evaluation, and prediction test. With regard to the strategies used by the teachers to diagnose students’ difficulties, analyzing students’ responses to tests was the majority. In this respect, observing students’ learning process during classroom activities is rarely done by the teachers in the purpose of diagnosing students’ learning difficulties. The results of the diagnosis are mainly used as the basis for remedial and drill and practices. The results imply that more support is needed for teachers to improve their competences particularly in diagnosing students’ thinking process difficulties when learning mathematics.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Indonesian Mathematical Society</dc:publisher><dc:date>2019-08-17</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.7798.357-364</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.22342/jme.10.3.7798.357-364</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal on Mathematics Education; Vol 10 No 3 (2019); 357-364</dc:source><dc:source>2407-0610</dc:source><dc:source>2087-8885</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/viewFile/7798/pdf</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>