Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

TEACHERS EXPECTATION OF STUDENTS’ THINKING PROCESSES IN WRITTEN WORKS: A SURVEY OF TEACHERS’ READINESS IN MAKING THINKING VISIBLE

Journal on Mathematics Education · Vol. 10 No. 3 (2019) · hlm. 409–424

DOI
10.22342/jme.10.3.7978.409-424
ISSN
2407-0610, 2087-8885
Terbit
2019-09-26
Penerbit
Indonesian Mathematical Society
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

The trends of teaching mathematical thinking and the existence of two thinking skills (critical dan creative thinking) the required by 21st-century skills have created needs for teachers to know their students’ thinking processes. This study is intended to portray how mathematics teachers expect their students showing their thinking processes in students’ written work. The authors surveyed Whatsapp and Telegram group of mathematics teachers. First, the authors shared the result of the literature review and the governmental regulations about the need to develop thinking skills. Second, the authors stated that the potentials of students’ written works as a tool for knowing students’ thinking processes. Third, the authors sent a simple mathematical problem with the topic of algebra and asked the mathematics teachers how should their students answer that problem such that they can easily monitor and assess their students’ thinking processes. A total of 25 teachers participated voluntarily in this survey. Results of the survey were triangulated with direct trial data in lecture classes at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels. The result indicates that participating mathematics teachers do not expect too much for their students to show their thinking processes in written work. Teacher’s focus is mostly on the accuracy and the correctness of their students’ mathematics answer.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

36 penulis · 107 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 40 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Malang
  • Universitas Jember
  • Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Yogyakarta State University
  • Universitas Serambi Mekkah
  • Universitas PGRI Madiun
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Purwanto PurwantoState University of Malang6
Cholis Sa’dijahState University of Malang3
Edy Bambang IrawanState University of Malang2
Susiswo SusiswoState University of Malang2
Dwiyana DwiyanaState University of Malang2
Anwar AnwarUniversitas Serambi Mekkah1
Ipung YuwonoState University of Malang1
Ali MahmudiYogyakarta State University1
Elah NuerlaelahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wasilatul MurtafiahUniversitas PGRI Madiun1
Tjang Daniel ChandraState University of Malang1
Ariyadi WijayaYogyakarta State University1
Mujiyem SaptiUniversitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo1
Ika SantiaState University of Malang1
Akbar SutawidjadjaState University of Malang1
Sudirman SudirmanState University of Malang1
Muhammad IrfanState University of Makassar1
Christine Wulandari SuryaningrumState University of Malang1
Hery SusantoState University of Malang1
Yoga Dwi Windy Kusuma NingtyasHiroshima University1
Indriati Nurul HidayahState University of Malang1
SUDIRMAN SUDIRMANState University of Malang1
Ahmad Anas HabibiUniversitas Jember1
SusantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurcholif Diah Sri LestariUniversitas Jember1
Erfan YudiantoUniversitas Jember1
Ihsan SanawiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Santi IrawatiState University of Malang1
Syamsuri SyamsuriSultan Ageng Tirtayasa University1
Yulyanti HarismanUniversitas Negeri Padang1
Hamdani SyaputraUniversitas Negeri Padang1
Kelly Angelly HevardaniUniversitas Negeri Padang1
Edwin MusdiUniversitas Negeri Padang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Data ini berasal dari Crossref (yang disetorkan penerbit), karena endpoint OAI-PMH milik jurnal tidak dapat di-harvest.

Sumber metadata: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2407-0610/works, pertama di-harvest 28 Okt 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata sebagai oai_dc, dikonversi dari Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>TEACHERS EXPECTATION OF STUDENTS’ THINKING PROCESSES IN WRITTEN WORKS: A SURVEY OF TEACHERS’ READINESS IN MAKING THINKING VISIBLE</dc:title><dc:creator>As'ari, Abdur Rahman</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kurniati, Dian</dc:creator><dc:creator>Subanji, Subanji</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;The trends of teaching mathematical thinking and the existence of two thinking skills (critical dan creative thinking) the required by 21st-century skills have created needs for teachers to know their students’ thinking processes. This study is intended to portray how mathematics teachers expect their students showing their thinking processes in students’ written work. The authors surveyed Whatsapp and Telegram group of mathematics teachers. First, the authors shared the result of the literature review and the governmental regulations about the need to develop thinking skills. Second, the authors stated that the potentials of students’ written works as a tool for knowing students’ thinking processes. Third, the authors sent a simple mathematical problem with the topic of algebra and asked the mathematics teachers how should their students answer that problem such that they can easily monitor and assess their students’ thinking processes. A total of 25 teachers participated voluntarily in this survey. Results of the survey were triangulated with direct trial data in lecture classes at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels. The result indicates that participating mathematics teachers do not expect too much for their students to show their thinking processes in written work. Teacher’s focus is mostly on the accuracy and the correctness of their students’ mathematics answer.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Indonesian Mathematical Society</dc:publisher><dc:date>2019-09-26</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.7978.409-424</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.22342/jme.10.3.7978.409-424</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal on Mathematics Education; Vol 10 No 3 (2019); 409-424</dc:source><dc:source>2407-0610</dc:source><dc:source>2087-8885</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/viewFile/7978/pdf</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>