Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Argumentation Skill Assessment for Diagnosing Students' Understanding of Factual, Conceptual, Procedural, and Metacognitive Knowledge: Characteristics of Initial Needs

Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia · Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023) · pp. 14–23

DOI
10.15294/jpii.v12i1.40108
ISSN
2089-4392, 2339-1286
Published
2023-03-30
Publisher
Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)
Language
eng

Abstract

This study aims to synthesize the characteristics of the initial needs for argumentative skills assessment instruments to diagnose students’ understanding of factual, conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive knowledge. This study used a quasi-experimental method. The technique used was quantitative descriptive research. The research subjects were taken from 50 students who used argumentative patterns in problem-solving on aquatic ecology material so that they were synthesized using argumentation skill indicators. This research was quantitative, with instrument construct design criteria in the cognitive domain based on the taxonomy of science education. The data in the study were collected through several tests to determine argumentation skills. Supporting data were obtained through questionnaires to be analyzed regarding content and learning tools. The data analysis technique calculated the average score of the test questions with criteria according to the skills of argumentation and analysis in terms of content and learning tools. The result of this research is a matrix of rigid test areas with the achievement of indicators of a neatly arranged argumentation skill questionnaire and the results of content analysis and learning tools that support the argumentation instrument.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

17 authors · 32 co-authorship links · 9 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • University of Bengkulu
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu
  • University of Patras
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Endina Putri PurwandariUniversity of Bengkulu1
Ariefa Primair YaniUniversity of Bengkulu1
Ramanda SugrahaUniversity of Bengkulu1
Kurnia AnggrianiUniversity of Bengkulu1
S LatifahUniversitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung1
Ruhban MaskurUniversitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung1
Agitha PriciliaUniversitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung1
Konstantinos RavanisUniversity of Patras1
Ardia Tita KartikaAffiliation unknown1
Lydea EftiwinAffiliation unknown1
Ages ErestiAffiliation unknown1
Despa DespaAffiliation unknown1
Della Verta Sari PutriAffiliation unknown1
Hesti Putri Nyai SaktiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpii/oai, first harvested 29 Okt 2026, last seen 29 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Argumentation Skill Assessment for Diagnosing Students' Understanding of Factual, Conceptual, Procedural, and Metacognitive Knowledge: Characteristics of Initial Needs</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Walid, A.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Winarni, E. W.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Yanti, F. A.</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">argumentation skill; assessment instrument; cognitive ability</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aims to synthesize the characteristics of the initial needs for argumentative skills assessment instruments to diagnose students’ understanding of factual, conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive knowledge. This study used a quasi-experimental method. The technique used was quantitative descriptive research. The research subjects were taken from 50 students who used argumentative patterns in problem-solving on aquatic ecology material so that they were synthesized using argumentation skill indicators. This research was quantitative, with instrument construct design criteria in the cognitive domain based on the taxonomy of science education. The data in the study were collected through several tests to determine argumentation skills. Supporting data were obtained through questionnaires to be analyzed regarding content and learning tools. The data analysis technique calculated the average score of the test questions with criteria according to the skills of argumentation and analysis in terms of content and learning tools. The result of this research is a matrix of rigid test areas with the achievement of indicators of a neatly arranged argumentation skill questionnaire and the results of content analysis and learning tools that support the argumentation instrument.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2023-03-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/40108</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpii.v12i1.40108</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia; Vol 12, No 1 (2023): March 2023; 14-23</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2089-4392</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2339-1286</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpii.v12i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/40108/14297</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/40108/10341</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/40108/11367</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/40108/11371</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/40108/11376</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/40108/11403</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/40108/11406</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>