Jurnal
SINTA 1
Argumentation Skill Assessment for Diagnosing Students' Understanding of Factual, Conceptual, Procedural, and Metacognitive Knowledge: Characteristics of Initial Needs
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia · Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023) · pp. 14–23
ISSN 2089-4392, 2339-1286
Published 2023-03-30
Publisher Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)
Language eng
Abstract
This study aims to synthesize the characteristics of the initial needs for argumentative skills assessment instruments to diagnose students’ understanding of factual, conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive knowledge. This study used a quasi-experimental method. The technique used was quantitative descriptive research. The research subjects were taken from 50 students who used argumentative patterns in problem-solving on aquatic ecology material so that they were synthesized using argumentation skill indicators. This research was quantitative, with instrument construct design criteria in the cognitive domain based on the taxonomy of science education. The data in the study were collected through several tests to determine argumentation skills. Supporting data were obtained through questionnaires to be analyzed regarding content and learning tools. The data analysis technique calculated the average score of the test questions with criteria according to the skills of argumentation and analysis in terms of content and learning tools. The result of this research is a matrix of rigid test areas with the achievement of indicators of a neatly arranged argumentation skill questionnaire and the results of content analysis and learning tools that support the argumentation instrument.
Collaboration network of the authors
17 authors ·
32 co-authorship links
· 9 across different organisations
Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.
University of Bengkulu Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu University of Patras Affiliation unknown
Different organisations
Same organisation
Affiliation unknown
Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.
Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpii/oai,
first harvested 29 Okt 2026,
last seen 29 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Argumentation Skill Assessment for Diagnosing Students' Understanding of Factual, Conceptual, Procedural, and Metacognitive Knowledge: Characteristics of Initial Needs</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Walid, A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Winarni, E. W.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Yanti, F. A.</dc:creator>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">argumentation skill; assessment instrument; cognitive ability</dc:subject>
<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aims to synthesize the characteristics of the initial needs for argumentative skills assessment instruments to diagnose students’ understanding of factual, conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive knowledge. This study used a quasi-experimental method. The technique used was quantitative descriptive research. The research subjects were taken from 50 students who used argumentative patterns in problem-solving on aquatic ecology material so that they were synthesized using argumentation skill indicators. This research was quantitative, with instrument construct design criteria in the cognitive domain based on the taxonomy of science education. The data in the study were collected through several tests to determine argumentation skills. Supporting data were obtained through questionnaires to be analyzed regarding content and learning tools. The data analysis technique calculated the average score of the test questions with criteria according to the skills of argumentation and analysis in terms of content and learning tools. The result of this research is a matrix of rigid test areas with the achievement of indicators of a neatly arranged argumentation skill questionnaire and the results of content analysis and learning tools that support the argumentation instrument.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)</dc:publisher>
<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
<dc:date>2023-03-30</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/40108</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpii.v12i1.40108</dc:identifier>
<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia; Vol 12, No 1 (2023): March 2023; 14-23</dc:source>
<dc:source>2089-4392</dc:source>
<dc:source>2339-1286</dc:source>
<dc:source>10.15294/jpii.v12i1</dc:source>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/40108/14297</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/40108/10341</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/40108/11367</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/40108/11371</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/40108/11376</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/40108/11403</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/40108/11406</dc:relation>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
Citations and indexing
OpenAlex
Indexed
via DOI
2 citations
Crossref
Indexed
via DOI
1 citation
Counts as reported by each index on 29 Okt 2026; indexes count citations differently.
OpenAlex also lists this work in: crossref, doaj.
Cite this article
APA 7
Walid, A., Winarni, E. W., & Yanti, F. A. (2023). Argumentation Skill Assessment for Diagnosing Students' Understanding of Factual, Conceptual, Procedural, and Metacognitive Knowledge: Characteristics of Initial Needs. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.40108
Copy
IEEE
A. Walid, E. W. Winarni, and F. A. Yanti, “Argumentation Skill Assessment for Diagnosing Students' Understanding of Factual, Conceptual, Procedural, and Metacognitive Knowledge: Characteristics of Initial Needs,” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 2023, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v12i1.40108.
Copy
Generated from the journal's metadata; check author names before use.