Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

THE PROFILE OF ARGUMENTATION SKILL USING “TOULMIN ARGUMENTATION PATTERN” ANALYSIS IN THE ARCHIMEDES PRINCIPAL ON THE STUDENTS OF SMA KOTA BANDAR LAMPUNG

Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia · Vol. 4 No. 1 (2015) · pp. 86–89

DOI
10.15294/jpii.v4i1.3506
ISSN
2089-4392, 2339-1286
Published
2015-04-01
Publisher
Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

This research aims to indentify student’s argumentation skill which is seen from argumentation discourse and then it is analyzed using TAP (Toulmin Argumentation Pattern) which consists of some components such as data, claim, warrant, backing and rebuttal on the topic of Archimedes Principle. The method used in this research is descriptive method. The result of this research shows based on the written assignment, the student’s scientific argumentation skill is not good. The student often do not use an appropriate argumentation, do not use adequate evidence, or try to straighten their own option or try to apply their own argument.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

10 authors · 21 co-authorship links · 7 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Lampung University
  • Indonesia University of Education
  • University of Technology Malaysia
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Agus SuyatnaLampung University3
⁠Undang RosidinLampung University1
Rizki Eka ShintyaIndonesia University of Education1
Noor FarawahidahUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
Chandra ErtikantoLampung University1
Ismu WahyudiLampung University1
INDAH SLAMET BUDIARTIAffiliation unknown1
Haza Kurnia DinatikanAffiliation unknown1
Cintya IrvantiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpii/oai, first harvested 29 Okt 2026, last seen 1 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">THE PROFILE OF ARGUMENTATION SKILL USING “TOULMIN ARGUMENTATION PATTERN” ANALYSIS IN THE ARCHIMEDES PRINCIPAL ON THE STUDENTS OF SMA KOTA BANDAR LAMPUNG</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Viyanti, V.</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Argumentation Skill; Toulmin Argumentation Pattern “TAP”; Archimedes Principle.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This research aims to indentify student’s argumentation skill which is seen from argumentation discourse and then it is analyzed using TAP (Toulmin Argumentation Pattern) which consists of some components such as data, claim, warrant, backing and rebuttal on the topic of Archimedes Principle. The method used in this research is descriptive method. The result of this research shows based on the written assignment, the student’s scientific argumentation skill is not good. The student often do not use an appropriate argumentation, do not use adequate evidence, or try to straighten their own option or try to apply their own argument.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2015-04-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/3506</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpii.v4i1.3506</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia; Vol 4, No 1 (2015): April 2015; 86-89</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2089-4392</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2339-1286</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpii.v4i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/3506/3344</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2015 Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>