Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Tuna’s exporting activities nowdays is still facing problem related with the stringent regulation and the complexity of sanitation program implemented in importing countries which triggers scores of rejection. This article discusses the analysis of regulation associated with seafood safety management system and tuna’s technical regulation initiated by Codex Alimentarius Comission (CAC), importing countries and Indonesia. Study was accomplished with content analysis method for seafood safety management system regulation instigated in importing countries and Indonesia using CAC references. Scoring method was achieved in analyzing tuna end-product technical regulation covering various indicators explicitly histamine, heavy metal and microbiology. Result of content analysis which refer to elements of food quality and safety management system recomended by Codex namely determination of good food material criteria, implementation of risk analysis in identification and characterization of potential hazard, implementation of food safety control based on risk analysis outcomes and establishing guidelines for hygienic food handling show that United States dan European Union had already formularized and performed those recomendation, meanwhile Canada, Japan, China and Indonesia had yet entirely executed the regulation. In accordance with the criteria of organizational structure for National Food Control Systems, the European Union and Canada implement integrated agency system, Japan has single agency system, in the meantime Indonesia, United States and China possess multiple agency system. Scoring analysis on tunas technical regulation reveal that European Union has the strictest standard following by USA, Indonesia, Canada, Cina, Japan and Codex respectively.

Jurnal Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia · Vol. 13 No. 1 (2011)

DOI
10.17844/jphpi.v13i1.3138
ISSN
2354-886X, 2303-2111
Terbit
2011-03-03
Penerbit
Department of Aquatic Product Technology IPB University in collaboration with Masyarakat Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia (MPHPI)
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Tuna’s exporting activities nowdays is still facing problem related with the stringent regulation and the complexity of sanitation program implemented in importing countries which triggers scores of rejection. This article discusses the analysis of regulation associated with seafood safety management system and tuna’s technical regulation initiated by Codex Alimentarius Comission (CAC), importing countries and Indonesia. Study was accomplished with content analysis method for seafood safety management system regulation instigated in importing countries and Indonesia using CAC references. Scoring method was achieved in analyzing tuna end-product technical regulation covering various indicators explicitly histamine, heavy metal and microbiology. Result of content analysis which refer to elements of food quality and safety management system recomended by Codex namely determination of good food material criteria, implementation of risk analysis in identification and characterization of potential hazard, implementation of food safety control based on risk analysis outcomes and establishing guidelines for hygienic food handling show that United States dan European Union had already formularized and performed those recomendation, meanwhile Canada, Japan, China and Indonesia had yet entirely executed the regulation. In accordance with the criteria of organizational structure for National Food Control Systems, the European Union and Canada implement integrated agency system, Japan has single agency system, in the meantime Indonesia, United States and China possess multiple agency system. Scoring analysis on tunas technical regulation reveal that European Union has the strictest standard following by USA, Indonesia, Canada, Cina, Japan and Codex respectively.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 201 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 16 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • IPB University
  • Bandung Institute of Technology
  • Institut Teknologi Dan Bisnis STIKOM Bali
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Bambang RiyantoIPB University10
‪Tati NurhayatiIPB University6
Wahyu RamadhanIPB University5
Joko SantosoIPB University5
Iriani SetyaningsihIPB University4
Joko SantosoIPB University3
Bambang RiyantoBandung Institute of Technology3
Bustami IbrahimIPB University3
Tati NurhayatiIPB University3
Kustiariyah TarmanIPB University2
Sugeng Heri SusenoIPB University2
Farel WidiarsyahIPB University2
Silva FauziahIPB University2
Fahri SinulinggaIPB University2
. UjuAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
NurjanahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Wahyu RamadhanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Joko SantosoInstitut Teknologi Dan Bisnis STIKOM Bali2
Zacky Arivai SantosaeAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wahyu RamadhanIPB University1
Purnama ArafahIPB University1
Zacky Arivai SantosaeAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Haekal TiftazaniIPB University1
Aulia HidayatiIPB University1
Aristi DianAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Purbayanto AriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mulyono S BaskoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ridwan AffandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Suradi SuradiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sutrisno SukiminAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Menofatria BoerAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Maglory SiburianAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tri WahyuningsihIPB University1
Safrina Dyah HardiningtyasIPB University1
Cahyuning IsnainiIPB University1
Zacky Arivaie SantosaIPB University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jphpi/oai, pertama di-harvest 9 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 9 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en"> Tuna’s exporting activities nowdays is still facing problem related with the stringent regulation and the complexity of sanitation program implemented in importing countries which triggers scores of rejection. This article discusses the analysis of regulation associated with seafood safety management system and tuna’s technical regulation initiated by Codex Alimentarius Comission (CAC), importing countries and Indonesia. Study was accomplished with content analysis method for seafood safety management system regulation instigated in importing countries and Indonesia using CAC references. Scoring method was achieved in analyzing tuna end-product technical regulation covering various indicators explicitly histamine, heavy metal and microbiology. Result of content analysis which refer to elements of food quality and safety management system recomended by Codex namely determination of good food material criteria, implementation of risk analysis in identification and characterization of potential hazard, implementation of food safety control based on risk analysis outcomes and establishing guidelines for hygienic food handling show that United States dan European Union had already formularized and performed those recomendation, meanwhile Canada, Japan, China and Indonesia had yet entirely executed the regulation. In accordance with the criteria of organizational structure for National Food Control Systems, the European Union and Canada implement integrated agency system, Japan has single agency system, in the meantime Indonesia, United States and China possess multiple agency system. Scoring analysis on tunas technical regulation reveal that European Union has the strictest standard following by USA, Indonesia, Canada, Cina, Japan and Codex respectively.</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Trilaksani, Wini</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Bintang, Maria</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Monintja, Daniel R</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hubeis, M</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en"> Tuna’s exporting activities nowdays is still facing problem related with the stringent regulation and the complexity of sanitation program implemented in importing countries which triggers scores of rejection. This article discusses the analysis of regulation associated with seafood safety management system and tuna’s technical regulation initiated by Codex Alimentarius Comission (CAC), importing countries and Indonesia. Study was accomplished with content analysis method for seafood safety management system regulation instigated in importing countries and Indonesia using CAC references. Scoring method was achieved in analyzing tuna end-product technical regulation covering various indicators explicitly histamine, heavy metal and microbiology. Result of content analysis which refer to elements of food quality and safety management system recomended by Codex namely determination of good food material criteria, implementation of risk analysis in identification and characterization of potential hazard, implementation of food safety control based on risk analysis outcomes and establishing guidelines for hygienic food handling show that United States dan European Union had already formularized and performed those recomendation, meanwhile Canada, Japan, China and Indonesia had yet entirely executed the regulation. In accordance with the criteria of organizational structure for National Food Control Systems, the European Union and Canada implement integrated agency system, Japan has single agency system, in the meantime Indonesia, United States and China possess multiple agency system. Scoring analysis on tunas technical regulation reveal that European Union has the strictest standard following by USA, Indonesia, Canada, Cina, Japan and Codex respectively.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Department of Aquatic Product Technology IPB University in collaboration with Masyarakat Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia (MPHPI)</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2011-03-03</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.ipb.ac.id/jphpi/article/view/%20%3Cp%20class%3D%22MsoNormal%22%20style%3D%22margin-bottom%3A.0001pt%3Btext-align%3Aj</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.17844/jphpi.v13i1.3138</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Jurnal Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia; Vol 13 No 1 (2010): Jurnal Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2010): Jurnal Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2354-886X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2303-2111</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.ipb.ac.id/jphpi/article/view/%20%3Cp%20class%3D%22MsoNormal%22%20style%3D%22margin-bottom%3A.0001pt%3Btext-align%3Aj/2084</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>