Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Analysis of Domestic Resources Cost Based on Farm Typology of Bali Cattle in Plampang Sumbawa Regency, West Nusa Tenggara

Tropical Animal Science Journal · Vol. 41 No. 3 (2018) · hlm. 224–233

DOI
10.5398/tasj.2018.41.3.224
ISSN
2615-790X, 2615-787X
Terbit
2018-11-30
Penerbit
Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The objectives of the study were to analyze the use of Domestic Resources Cost based on the most prevalent typology of Bali cattle farm and to analyze the economic efficiency based on the typology of Bali cattle farm in Plampang Sub-district Sumbawa Regency, West Nusa Tenggara (NTB). The study was carried out in Plampang Sub-district, Sumbawa Regency in 2017, with 53 respondents selected randomly and the key respondents were head of farms UPT, extension workers, inter-island traders, agricultural equipment traders, as well as agricultural materials and medicines traders. The respondents were acquired by applying systematic random sampling based on the farm typology with survey method and analyzed by the analysis of Domestic Resource Cost and analysis of Policy Analysis Matrix. There were three most prevalent farm typologies of Bali cattle production system used by the farmers in Plampang Sub-district, Sumbawa Regency, West Nusa Tenggara. The most prevalent production systems were: a typology of 6 months grazed (June-November) and 6 months confined (December-May) which was called with an acronym as 66 typology, typology of tethered throughout the year called as tethered typology, and typology of confined throughout the years called as confined typology. Bali cattle comparative advantage based on the farm typology as shown by Domestic Resource Cost Ratio (DRCR) values were 0.28 in 66 typology, 0.48 in tethered typology, and 0.31 in confined typology. It means that to save Rp. 100 is required the domestic factor cost Rp. 28 of 66 typology; Rp. 48 of tethered typology, and Rp. 31 of confined typology. Thus, it can be concluded that if domestic beef from Bali cattle is produced domestically, it will save the foreign exchange as much as 72% of 66 typology; 54% of tethered typology; and 69% of confined typology based on the import costs that must be spent. The competitive advantage is shown by the PCR values of 0.32 in 66 typology, 0.46 in tethered typology, and 0.35 in confined typology.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 122 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 49 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • University of Brawijaya
  • State University of Malang
  • Sebelas Maret University
  • Universitas Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Universitas Jember
  • Yogyakarta State University
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Cholis Sa’dijahState University of Malang2
Zaenal FananiUniversity of Brawijaya2
Amam AmamUniversitas Jember2
Bambang Ali NUGROHOUniversity of Brawijaya2
Jaisy Aghniarahim PutritamaraUniversity of Brawijaya2
Muhamad Galang IsnawanUniversitas Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram2
Naif Mastoor AlsulamiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Naif Mastoor AlsulamiUniversity of Jeddah2
Sudirman SudirmanIndonesia Open University2
Muhamad Galang IsnawanUniversitas Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram2
Subanji SubanjiState University of Malang1
Indriati Nurul HidayahState University of Malang1
Yokhebed YokhebedTanjungpura University1
Sutarno SutarnoSebelas Maret University1
Mohammad MasykuriSebelas Maret University1
Baskoro Adi PrayitnoSebelas Maret University1
Edi CahyonoUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Kadir KadirUniversitas Halu Oleo1
U. WisaptiningsihUniversity of Brawijaya1
A. PurwantoYogyakarta State University1
didik purwiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
B A SetionoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
A. IrsyammawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
V. AfriliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nirwansyah AmierAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ihsan Syawal RahmatAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Moh Shadiqur RahmanUniversity of Brawijaya1
Nuhfil HananiUniversity of Brawijaya1
Fahriyah FahriyahUniversitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya1
Rosihan AsmaraUniversity of Brawijaya1
Mahfudlotul UlaUniversity of Brawijaya1
Condro Puspo NugrohoUniversity of Brawijaya1
Arif Yustian Maulana NoorUniversity of Brawijaya1
Candra Adi IntyasUniversity of Brawijaya1
Mohammad Ilyas ShalehNational Pingtung University of Science and Technology1
Wanda Nugroho YanuartoMuhammadiyah University Purwokerto1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/tasj/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Analysis of Domestic Resources Cost Based on Farm Typology of Bali Cattle in Plampang Sumbawa Regency, West Nusa Tenggara</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sudirman, Sudirman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hartono, B.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Subagiyo, I.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nugroho, B. A.</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">competitiveness</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">comparative advantage</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">competitive advantage</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">prevalence</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The objectives of the study were to analyze the use of Domestic Resources Cost based on the most prevalent typology of Bali cattle farm and to analyze the economic efficiency based on the typology of Bali cattle farm in Plampang Sub-district Sumbawa Regency, West Nusa Tenggara (NTB). The study was carried out in Plampang Sub-district, Sumbawa Regency in 2017, with 53 respondents selected randomly and the key respondents were head of farms UPT, extension workers, inter-island traders, agricultural equipment traders, as well as agricultural materials and medicines traders. The respondents were acquired by applying systematic random sampling based on the farm typology with survey method and analyzed by the analysis of Domestic Resource Cost and analysis of Policy Analysis Matrix. There were three most prevalent farm typologies of Bali cattle production system used by the farmers in Plampang Sub-district, Sumbawa Regency, West Nusa Tenggara. The most prevalent production systems were: a typology of 6 months grazed (June-November) and 6 months confined (December-May) which was called with an acronym as 66 typology, typology of tethered throughout the year called as tethered typology, and typology of confined throughout the years called as confined typology. Bali cattle comparative advantage based on the farm typology as shown by Domestic Resource Cost Ratio (DRCR) values were 0.28 in 66 typology, 0.48 in tethered typology, and 0.31 in confined typology. It means that to save Rp. 100 is required the domestic factor cost Rp. 28 of 66 typology; Rp. 48 of tethered typology, and Rp. 31 of confined typology. Thus, it can be concluded that if domestic beef from Bali cattle is produced domestically, it will save the foreign exchange as much as 72% of 66 typology; 54% of tethered typology; and 69% of confined typology based on the import costs that must be spent. The competitive advantage is shown by the PCR values of 0.32 in 66 typology, 0.46 in tethered typology, and 0.35 in confined typology.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-11-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/view/24340</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.5398/tasj.2018.41.3.224</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Tropical Animal Science Journal; Vol. 41 No. 3 (2018): Tropical Animal Science Journal; 224-233</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2615-790X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2615-787X</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.ipb.ac.id/tasj/article/view/24340/15891</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2018 Tropical Animal Science Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>