Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

A Comparative Study Between Conventional Reading Strategies And KWL Technique On Students’ Reading Comprehension At Grade 8 Of SMP Negeri 9 Kendari

Journal of Language Education and Educational Technology (JLEET) · Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017)

DOI
10.33772/jleet.v2i1.6707
ISSN
2502-3306
Published
2017-02-02
Publisher
Halu Oleo University
Language
eng

Abstract

Understanding reading passage requires the activation of background knowledge, vocabulary competence and the understanding of the rules of the target language to construct the meaning of the text. This research is set out to discover the effective teaching to improve the reading comprehension by activating the students’ background knowledge, connecting it to the current text to read and producing the meaning. Appointing to the connection between the background knowledge to the text, this research investigates the comparison between the traditional group work of reading and use of KWL technique for teaching reading at grade 8 of SMPN 9 Kendari. The objective of this study is to investigate, there is or not a significant difference of reading comprehension between students who learn reading based on conventional teaching and those who learn based on KWL technique. This study applied matching pre-post comparison group design, which involves two cohorts namely control and experimental group. The hypothesis of this study is “there is a significant difference of reading comprehension between the students who learn reading based on traditional group work of reading and those who learn reading based on task based learning. Using independent t-test to evaluate the hypothesis of this study (sig. 2-tailed = 0.00 0.05), reveals that there is a significant difference of reading comprehension between students who learn reading based on traditional group work of reading and those learn based on task based learning. This study is also covers the students’ motivation in learning reading based on traditional group working and task based learning. It shows that students who learn reading English text by using KWL technique were positively motivated than those who do not. Therefore, this study suggests to use KWL technique in the teaching of reading especially at Grade 8th of SMPN 9 Kendari. It also suggested that further research to apply KWL technique to improve the students’ reading comprehension can be applied in the form paperless or digital form of KWL to make it more attractive and dynamically accessible without considering the geographical span.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 109 co-authorship links · 29 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Bandung Institute of Technology
  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo
  • Andalas University
  • Other organisations
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Alberth AlberthAffiliation unknown3
Aris BadaraUniversitas Halu Oleo3
Nurnia NurniaAffiliation unknown2
Sidu MarafaadAffiliation unknown2
Rohmana RohmanaUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Asrun LioAffiliation unknown2
Sahlan SahlanAffiliation unknown2
La InoUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Wervyan ShalannandaBandung Institute of Technology1
Fajri Anugerah Pramadhana KornelBandung Institute of Technology1
Naufal Rafi HibatullahBandung Institute of Technology1
Fahmi FahmiUniversitas Sumatera Utara1
Erwin SutantoUniversitas Airlangga1
Muhammad AzizInstitute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo1
Muhammad Imran HamidAndalas University1
Nurshiyam HanrolanAffiliation unknown1
Samsuddin SamsuddinAffiliation unknown1
Gida MuthiasariAffiliation unknown1
Hanna HannaUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Risal RisalAffiliation unknown1
Kamaluddin KamaluddinUniversitas Merdeka Malang1
Masniah MasniahAffiliation unknown1
Awal SuhardimanAffiliation unknown1
Asyarifullah RamliAffiliation unknown1
Ader LaepeAffiliation unknown1
Jenny SamosirAffiliation unknown1
La Ode Sidu MarafatAffiliation unknown1
Wa Ode Siti Nur IndahAffiliation unknown1
Endriyatin EndriyatinAffiliation unknown1
Amiruddin RahimAffiliation unknown1
Nur Iman SaiAffiliation unknown1
Yeni YeniAffiliation unknown1
Fadlan SalimAffiliation unknown1
Zalili SailanAffiliation unknown1
Anugrah Puspita Ayu M.Affiliation unknown1
La Ode SamiaAffiliation unknown1
Mujahiddin MujahiddinAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JLEET/oai, first harvested 30 Okt 2026, last seen 1 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">A Comparative Study Between Conventional Reading Strategies And KWL Technique On Students’ Reading Comprehension At Grade 8 Of SMP Negeri 9 Kendari</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Ramadhan, Mukti</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Yazid, Muhammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Tambunan, Tambunan</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Understanding reading passage requires the activation of background knowledge, vocabulary competence and the understanding of the rules of the target language to construct the meaning of the text. This research is set out to discover the effective teaching to improve the reading comprehension by activating the students’ background knowledge, connecting it to the current text to read and producing the meaning. Appointing to the connection between the background knowledge to the text, this research investigates the comparison between the traditional group work of reading and use of KWL technique for teaching reading at grade 8 of SMPN 9 Kendari. The objective of this study is to investigate, there is or not a significant difference of reading comprehension between students who learn reading based on conventional teaching and those who learn based on KWL technique. This study applied matching pre-post comparison group design, which involves two cohorts namely control and experimental group. The hypothesis of this study is “there is a significant difference of reading comprehension between the students who learn reading based on traditional group work of reading and those who learn reading based on task based learning. Using independent t-test to evaluate the hypothesis of this study (sig. 2-tailed = 0.00  0.05), reveals that there is a significant difference of reading comprehension between students who learn reading based on traditional group work of reading and those learn based on task based learning. This study is also covers the students’ motivation in learning reading based on traditional group working and task based learning. It shows that students who learn reading English text by using KWL technique were positively motivated than those who do not. Therefore, this study suggests to use KWL technique in the teaching of reading especially at Grade 8th of SMPN 9 Kendari. It also suggested that further research to apply KWL technique to improve the students’ reading comprehension can be applied in the form paperless or digital form of KWL to make it more attractive and dynamically accessible without considering the geographical span.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Halu Oleo University</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2017-02-02</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JLEET/article/view/6707</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.33772/jleet.v2i1.6707</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Language Education and Educational Technology (JLEET); Vol 2, No 1 (2017): Journal of Language Education and Educational Technology</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-3306</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.33772/jleet.v2i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JLEET/article/view/6707/4939</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Language Education and Educational Technology (JLEET)</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>