Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Comparison of Appraisal Resources in Argumentative Essays Written by Students with Different Proficiency Levels

English Education Journal · Vol. 9 No. 4 (2019) · hlm. 484–491

DOI
10.15294/eej.v9i4.31980
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2019-07-31
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study aimed to explain the appraisal resources manifested in argumentative essays written by undergraduate students with high and low proficiency level, as well as their similarities and differences of using appraisal resources. This study employed qualitative research in the form of written discourse analysis. The appraisal resources checklist adapted from Martin and White (2005) is used to determine the distribution of appraising items of attitude, engagement and graduation in argumentative essays written by high and low proficiency students. Out of 16 students chosen as the sample, 8 students are categorized as having high proficiency level, and the others eight belong to low proficiency level. The results of this study revealed that both groups of students utilized all subsystem of appraisal resources. However, high proficiency students dominantly used engagement rather than attitude and graduation. Meanwhile, the lows one utilized more attitude than engagement and graduation. In term of attitude, high proficiency students produced more appreciation. It showed that the argumentative essays written by high proficiency students are more appreciative than emotional and judgmental to align their personal voices in conveying their thoughts and opinions. In addition, in term of engagement, both groups dominantly applied entertain item in which it showed that both groups of students are successful to show their authorial voice towards the topic given. Finally, in graduation feature, force is dominantly used by both groups of students which means that they tried to intensify and quantify their arguments to build strong persuasion.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 132 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 1 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Lampung University
  • Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • University of Brawijaya
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Abdurrahman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Irawaty IrawatyUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Rini FidiyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Eko MukmintoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mudyawati KamaruddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rasheed AhmadAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rizki Agung WibowoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Khoirin NisaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hilda VeneliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dian KurniasariLampung University1
Zaenal MukhlisinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wamiliana WamilianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Holy Latifah HanumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahayu Fery AnitasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Edward Michael SimangunsongAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hafidz DaffaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Samuel Adi NugrohoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wahyu Nur HidayatPoliteknik Negeri Malang1
Rahmana Ilmi HakimUniversity of Brawijaya1
Ellvina Pramitadewi PramitadewiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fauziyatur RohmahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aldhy Sigma Lintang PamungkasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Heri CahyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Moh. AsroriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dzulkifli AbdullahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hermin Anggrianing TyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Arina YuliartiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Trias SeptianingsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdul KhalimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Comparison of Appraisal Resources in Argumentative Essays Written by Students with Different Proficiency Levels</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Fauziah, Meli</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Warsono, Warsono</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Widhiyanto, Widhiyanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aimed to explain the appraisal resources manifested in argumentative essays written by undergraduate students with high and low proficiency level, as well as their similarities and differences of using appraisal resources. This study employed qualitative research in the form of written discourse analysis. The appraisal resources checklist adapted from Martin and White (2005) is used to determine the distribution of appraising items of attitude, engagement and graduation in argumentative essays written by high and low proficiency students. Out of 16 students chosen as the sample, 8 students are categorized as having high proficiency level, and the others eight belong to low proficiency level. The results of this study revealed that both groups of students utilized all subsystem of appraisal resources. However, high proficiency students dominantly used engagement&amp;nbsp; rather than attitude and graduation. Meanwhile, the lows one utilized more attitude than engagement and graduation. In term of attitude, high proficiency students produced more appreciation. It showed that the argumentative essays written by high proficiency students are more appreciative than emotional and judgmental to align their personal voices in conveying their thoughts and opinions. In addition, in term of engagement, both groups dominantly applied entertain item in which it showed that both groups of students are successful to show their authorial voice towards the topic given. Finally, in graduation feature, force is dominantly used by both groups of students which means that they tried to intensify and quantify their arguments to build strong persuasion.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-07-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/31980</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v9i4.31980</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 9 No 4 (2019): December 2019; 484-491</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v9i4</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/31980/13826</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>