Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Mechanism Of Execution Of Mortgage Rights In Sharia Economic Cases In Religious Courts (Study Of Decision Number 3478/Pdt.G/Pa.Pml)

Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal · Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026) · hlm. 1213–1240

DOI
10.15294/ipmhi.v5i4.47124
ISSN
2807-8330, 2797-8508
Terbit
2026-07-01
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study examines the mechanism of implementing Mortgage Rights in Islamic economic cases in the Religious Court, with a case study of Decision Number 3478/Pdt.G/2024/PA.PML. In the context of the development of Islamic economics in Indonesia, the implementation of mortgage rights as collateral in Islamic financing is a crucial issue, particularly regarding debtor protection and fairness in the execution process. The research method used is a juridical-normative approach with a statutory regulatory approach, case studies, and the concept of Maqashid al-Shari'ah. The results show that the implementation of mortgage rights execution still follows conventional civil law mechanisms that prioritize formal legal certainty, but do not accommodate Sharia values ​​such as deliberation, good faith, and substantive justice. Execution through parate executie often harms debtors because the auction limit price is set below market value. From the perspective of Maqasid al-Shari'ah (the principle of Shariah), judges should act as ḥāris al-‘adl (the principle of justice) by upholding hifz al-mal (the principle of justice), al-adl (the principle of equality), tawazun (the principle of justice), and maslahah (the principle of maslahah), so that the execution of the debt can balance the rights of creditors and the protection of debtors. This research recommends regulatory reforms related to the determination of auction limit prices, the integration of Maqasid al-Shari'ah principles into religious court decisions, and the granting of more effective rights for debtors to file objections before execution. Thus, harmonization between national law and Sharia principles can be achieved for the sake of justice and the common good.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

39 penulis · 95 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Yustina Dhian NovitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Dian LatifianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dewi Zahra SetyawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Veyza OliviaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Armanda N ArdiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Qlarissa MelindaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Hisyam Maliki AkbarAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Fitria DamayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zainurohmah ZainurohmahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rizqiya Lailatul IzzaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Indriana FirdausAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nur Arif NugrahaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Suhadi SuhadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Cahya WulandariState University of Semarang1
Nisma Raditya ArbayaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kartika Fajar CahyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Iwan SulistiyoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wahyudin WahyudinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yusuf Dwi UtomoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Annisa TussalehaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Pratama Herry HerlambangAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Farkhan Radyafani WinarnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad HabiburrahmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ali MurtadhoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rayi Kharisma RajibAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad RofiqAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Vini Wiratno PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurul FibriantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lesa ParantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alifa Rizqia RachmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Annisa Cahya MadaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
R Benny RiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rizky Yanda ShagiraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lutfi UlinuhaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wahyudin WahyudinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Raphael Bertrand MayakaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
pingky auliyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ipmhi/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Mechanism Of Execution Of Mortgage Rights In Sharia Economic Cases In Religious Courts (Study Of Decision Number 3478/Pdt.G/Pa.Pml)</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">assayyidahfadlilah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Baidhowi, Baidhowi</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">mortgage</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">parate execution</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">auction</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">islamic economics</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">maqashid al-sharia'ah</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study examines the mechanism of implementing Mortgage Rights in Islamic economic cases in the Religious Court, with a case study of Decision Number 3478/Pdt.G/2024/PA.PML. In the context of the development of Islamic economics in Indonesia, the implementation of mortgage rights as collateral in Islamic financing is a crucial issue, particularly regarding debtor protection and fairness in the execution process. The research method used is a juridical-normative approach with a statutory regulatory approach, case studies, and the concept of Maqashid al-Shari'ah. The results show that the implementation of mortgage rights execution still follows conventional civil law mechanisms that prioritize formal legal certainty, but do not accommodate Sharia values ​​such as deliberation, good faith, and substantive justice. Execution through parate executie often harms debtors because the auction limit price is set below market value. From the perspective of Maqasid al-Shari'ah (the principle of Shariah), judges should act as ḥāris al-‘adl (the principle of justice) by upholding hifz al-mal (the principle of justice), al-adl (the principle of equality), tawazun (the principle of justice), and maslahah (the principle of maslahah), so that the execution of the debt can balance the rights of creditors and the protection of debtors. This research recommends regulatory reforms related to the determination of auction limit prices, the integration of Maqasid al-Shari'ah principles into religious court decisions, and the granting of more effective rights for debtors to file objections before execution. Thus, harmonization between national law and Sharia principles can be achieved for the sake of justice and the common good.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-07-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ipmhi/article/view/47124</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ipmhi.v5i4.47124</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal; Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025):  Special Issue II: UNNES Students' Contribution to Advancing the Development of Indonesian Legal Studies; 1213-1240</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2807-8330</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2797-8508</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ipmhi.v5i4</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ipmhi/article/view/47124/10523</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 IPMHI Law Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>