Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Speed Control of a Single Taipei Mass Rapid Transit System Train by Using a Single Input Fuzzy Logic Controller

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 6 No. 2 (2016)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v6i2.pp621-629
ISSN
2088-8708, 2088-8708
Published
2016-04-01
Publisher
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to design a speed controller for mass rapid transit (MRT) train by using a single input fuzzy logic controller (SIFLC). A complete train model, which was designed according to the design of a Taipei MRT train was used for analyzing both mechanical and electrical parts. The SIFLC was used for improving a fuzzy logic controller (FLC) by reducing its number of control rules. The results indicated that the SIFLC exhibited more favorable performance than the FLC did and a substantial reduction in the number of fuzzy rules and processing time. Therefore, tuning the SIFLC was easier compared with tuning the FLC; furthermore, the simulation time of the SIFLC was shorter than that of the FLC, exhibiting reductions of up to 17.3% in a constant track (track without gradient and curvature) and up to 12.27% in a variable track (track with gradient and curvature).

Collaboration network of the authors

15 authors · 32 co-authorship links · 4 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta
  • Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Iswanto IswantoMuhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta8
Teguh Bharata AdjiUniversitas Gadjah Mada4
Hendri Himawan TriharmintoUniversitas Gadjah Mada4
Igi ArdiyantoUniversitas Gadjah Mada4
Adhi SusantoUniversitas Gadjah Mada2
Muhammad KusbanMuhammadiyah University of Surakarta2
Almido Haryanto GintingUniversitas Gadjah Mada2
Lasmadi LasmadiUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Risanuri HidayatUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Samiadji HerdjunantoUniversitas Gadjah Mada1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Speed Control of a Single Taipei Mass Rapid Transit System Train by Using a Single Input Fuzzy Logic Controller</dc:title><dc:creator>Maghfiroh, Hari</dc:creator><dc:creator>Wahyunggoro, Oyas</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cahyadi, Adha Imam</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lian, Kuo Lung</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ke, Bwo Ren</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;The purpose of this study was to design a speed controller for mass rapid transit (MRT) train by using a single input fuzzy logic controller (SIFLC). A complete train model, which was designed according to the design of a Taipei MRT train was used for analyzing both mechanical and electrical parts. The SIFLC was used for improving a fuzzy logic controller (FLC) by reducing its number of control rules. The results indicated that the SIFLC exhibited more favorable performance than the FLC did and a substantial reduction in the number of fuzzy rules and processing time. Therefore, tuning the SIFLC was easier compared with tuning the FLC; furthermore, the simulation time of the SIFLC was shorter than that of the FLC, exhibiting reductions of up to 17.3% in a constant track (track without gradient and curvature) and up to 12.27% in a variable track (track with gradient and curvature).&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2016-04-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v6i2.pp621-629</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v6i2.pp621-629</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 6 No 2 (2016); 621</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>http://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/142/158</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>