Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

A Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Decentralized Storage Systems in the Digital Age

APTISI Transactions on Management (ATM) · Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025) · hlm. 11–20

DOI
10.33050/atm.v10i1.2531
ISSN
2622-6804, 2622-6812
Terbit
2025-01-06
Penerbit
Pandawan
Bahasa
en
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The background of this research originates from the critical role of data storage in the advancement of modern digital technology, where centralized traditional cloud storage models have become dominant due to their accessibility and ease of data management. However, the challenges faced by these models include limited scalability, high operational costs, and vulnerabilities related to data security and privacy. In response to these limitations, the InterPlanetary File System (IPFS) has emerged as a decentralized storage solution that offers an alternative approach to data storage and distribution. The objective of this study is to compare IPFS and traditional cloud storage based on four key aspects: scalability, security, cost, and performance. The methodology involves a literature review and case studies of IPFS implementation in various practical scenarios. The findings reveal that while IPFS offers superior decentralization and resistance to data censorship, it still suffers from inefficiencies in data re- trieval and challenges in large-scale adoption. The results show that traditional cloud storage demonstrates advantages in access speed and integration capabilities but remains constrained by higher costs and the risks associated with data centralization. The conclusion emphasizes the need for continued research to enhance the efficiency of IPFS and to explore hybrid storage models that integrate the benefits of both decentralized and centralized technologies.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

37 penulis · 97 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 31 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Raharja
  • Bakrie University
  • Graphic Era Hill University
  • The University of Queensland
  • University of Agriculture Faisalabad
  • Universitas Banten Jaya
  • Universitas Catur Insan Cendekia Cirebon
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Untung RahardjaUniversitas Raharja2
Efa Ayu NabilaUniversitas Raharja2
Alfiah KhoirunisaUniversitas Raharja1
Alexander WilliamsThe University of Queensland1
Sella AvionitaUniversitas Raharja1
Qurotul AiniUniversitas Raharja1
Sugeng SantosoUniversitas Raharja1
Tarisya RamadhanUniversitas Raharja1
Achmad BadriantoUniversitas Raharja1
Euis NurninawatiUniversitas Raharja1
Alpi MaulanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Irsa Rizkita AdianitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Rehan AnwarUniversity of Agriculture Faisalabad1
Irsa Rizkita AdianitaUniversitas Raharja1
Sudaryono SudaryonoUniversitas Banten Jaya1
Siti Patimah MaesarohUniversitas Raharja1
Diah AryaniUniversitas Raharja1
Aji Gempur PamungkasBakrie University1
Arief Bimantoro SuharkoBakrie University1
JawahirUniversitas Raharja1
Ankur Singh BistAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ankur Singh BistGraphic Era Hill University1
Bhupesh RawatGraphic Era Hill University1
Nur Ihsan PermadiUniversitas Raharja1
yusuf febriansyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Oryz Agnu Dian WulandariUniversitas Catur Insan Cendekia Cirebon1
Yusuf FebriansyahUniversitas Raharja1
Muhtarom MuhtaromIndonesia Open University1
Sutama Wisnu DyatmikaUniversitas Airlangga1
Untung RahardjaUniversity of Technology Malaysia1
Dwi Nur RamadhanUniversitas Raharja1
Lily Maria EvansAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ijc.ilearning.co/ATM/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">A Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Decentralized Storage Systems in the Digital Age</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Po Abbas Sunarya</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Desy Apriani</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ruli Supriati</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Danang Surya Budi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">John Edwards</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Storage Systems</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Data Storage</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">IPFS</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Cloud Storage</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Scalability</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The background of this research originates from the critical role of data storage in the advancement of modern digital technology, where centralized traditional cloud storage models have become dominant due to their accessibility and ease of data management. However, the challenges faced by these models include limited scalability, high operational costs, and vulnerabilities related to data security and privacy. In response to these limitations, the InterPlanetary File System (IPFS) has emerged as a decentralized storage solution that offers an alternative approach to data storage and distribution. The objective of this study is to compare IPFS and traditional cloud storage based on four key aspects: scalability, security, cost, and performance. The methodology involves a literature review and case studies of IPFS implementation in various practical scenarios. The findings reveal that while IPFS offers superior decentralization and resistance to data censorship, it still suffers from inefficiencies in data re- trieval and challenges in large-scale adoption. The results show that traditional cloud storage demonstrates advantages in access speed and integration capabilities but remains constrained by higher costs and the risks associated with data centralization. The conclusion emphasizes the need for continued research to enhance the efficiency of IPFS and to explore hybrid storage models that integrate the benefits of both decentralized and centralized technologies.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Pandawan</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-01-06</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ijc.ilearning.co/ATM/article/view/2531</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.33050/atm.v10i1.2531</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">APTISI Transactions on Management (ATM); Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): January; 11-20</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">APTISI Transactions on Management (ATM); Vol 10 No 1 (2026): January; 11-20</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2622-6804</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2622-6812</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.33050/atm.v10i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ijc.ilearning.co/ATM/article/view/2531/930</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Po Abbas Sunarya, Desy Apriani, Ruli Supriati, Danang Surya Budi, John Edwards</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>