Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Analysis of students error in global meta-level algebraic thinking on problem proving on CORE learning assisted by scaffolding

Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education · Vol. 10 No. 1 (2021) · hlm. 27–38

DOI
10.15294/ujme.v10i1.32419
ISSN
2460-5840, 2252-6927
Terbit
2021-03-31
Penerbit
Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The aims of this study are to identifies the quality of mathematics learning used CORE model assisted by scaffolding, examine whether students' ability in global meta-level algebraic thingking pass the minimun completeness criteria, describes the type and the causes of students error in global meta-level algebraic thingking, and type of scaffolding for lower group students. This is a mixed-method research. The population of this research are students of class XI-IPA at SMAN 1 Bojong. The sample of this research are students of class XI-IPA 3 as many as 32 students. The research subjects were taken 9 students, each of 3 students from the uuper, middle, and lower groups. Data collection methods used documentation, interviewies, and test. Teh validity of the data is done by triangulating the result of test and interviews. Data is analyzed by doing data reduction, data presentation, and verificatiton. The results of this research showed that (1) the quality of mathematics learning used CORE model assisted by scaffolding in very good criteria; (2 students' ability in global meta-level algebraic thingking on CORE learning assisted by scaffolding pass the minimun completeness criteria; (3) upper group students tend to make some error in the process skill and encoding steps, middle group students tend to make some error in the process skill steps, while lower group students tend to make some error in the transformation and process skill steps; (4) the cause of the error are lack of students’ accuracy in writing problem information modeling, inaccurate in calculation process, not able to complete the proving process, and inaccurate in writing down the variables in conclusion sentences; (5) scaffolding reviewing is given for transformation and encoding errors, scaffolding explaining, reviewing, and restructuring are given for process skill errors.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 94 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 2 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Yogyakarta State University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Rochmad RochmadState University of Semarang6
Ary Woro KurniasihState University of Semarang5
Masrukan MasrukanState University of Semarang3
Mashuri MashuriState University of Semarang3
Kholifatu Ulil AzmiState University of Semarang2
Mulyono MulyonoState University of Semarang2
Muhammad KharisState University of Semarang2
Muhammad Zuhair ZahidState University of Semarang2
Rembulan Permata OctaliaState University of Semarang1
St. Budi WaluyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Scolastika MarianiState University of Semarang1
Annisa Salma ZakiyyahState University of Semarang1
Puput RelitasariState University of Semarang1
MashuriState University of Semarang1
Chitra Ayu NevtianingsiState University of Semarang1
Fitri Novita SariState University of Semarang1
Zuyun KhoiriyahState University of Semarang1
Rani AnggrainiState University of Semarang1
Sugiman SugimanYogyakarta State University1
Ahmad Ijlal AbdikaState University of Semarang1
Meli SeptianaState University of Semarang1
Ratih KusumawatiState University of Semarang1
Wuryanto WuryantoState University of Semarang1
Hardi SuyitnoState University of Semarang1
Ula Himatul AliyahState University of Semarang1
Puji HandayaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ylyas SopyyevState University of Semarang1
Endang Retno WinartiState University of Semarang1
Rina Nurul FathiyaState University of Semarang1
Soviana Nur SavitriState University of Semarang1
Nana Umi LatifahState University of Semarang1
Nawang Kusuma MirantiState University of Semarang1
Linda WijayaState University of Semarang1
Nur Aisyah IstiState University of Semarang1
Ahmad BadawiState University of Semarang1
Bambang Eko SusiloState University of Semarang1
Oei Yuda Setiyo PriyantoState University of Semarang1
Didik Adi SaputroState University of Semarang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujme/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Analysis of students error in global meta-level algebraic thinking on problem proving on CORE learning assisted by scaffolding</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Ihtiani, Ana</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Agoestanto, Arief</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The aims of this study are to identifies the quality of mathematics learning used CORE model assisted by scaffolding, examine whether students' ability in global meta-level algebraic thingking pass the minimun completeness criteria, describes the type and the causes of students error in global meta-level algebraic thingking, and type of scaffolding for lower group students. This is a mixed-method research. The population of this research are students of class XI-IPA at SMAN 1 Bojong. The sample of this research are students of class XI-IPA 3 as many as 32 students. The research subjects were taken 9 students, each of 3 students from the uuper, middle, and lower groups. Data collection methods used documentation, interviewies, and&amp;nbsp; test. Teh validity of the data is done by triangulating the result of test and interviews. Data is analyzed by doing data reduction, data presentation, and verificatiton. The results of this research showed that (1) the quality of mathematics learning used CORE model assisted by scaffolding in very good criteria; (2 students' ability in global meta-level algebraic thingking on CORE learning assisted by scaffolding pass the minimun completeness criteria; (3) upper group students tend to make some error in the process skill and encoding steps, middle group students tend to make some error in the process skill steps, while lower group students tend to make some error in the transformation and process skill steps; (4) the cause of the error are lack of students’ accuracy in writing problem information modeling, inaccurate in calculation process, not able to complete the proving process, and inaccurate in writing down the variables in conclusion sentences; (5) scaffolding reviewing is given for transformation and encoding errors, scaffolding explaining, reviewing, and restructuring are given for process skill errors.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-03-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujme/article/view/32419</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ujme.v10i1.32419</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education; Vol 10 No 1 (2021): Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education; 27-38</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2460-5840</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6927</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ujme.v10i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujme/article/view/32419/19372</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>