Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Mathematical Communication Ability with Brain-Based Learning Model in Terms of Gender

Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education · Vol. 10 No. 3 (2021) · hlm. 216–221

DOI
10.15294/ujme.v10i3.54140
ISSN
2460-5840, 2252-6927
Terbit
2021-11-30
Penerbit
Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Mathematical communication ability is one of the basic skills standards in mathematics. However, mathematical communication ability with students is still low. This can be seen from the work of students who still have difficulty expressing mathematical problems with mathematical symbols and have difficulty interpreting mathematical ideas in writing. It seems that students find it difficult to express mathematical ideas into writing. This study aims to (1) determine the attainment of the classic dimension of the ability of mathematics students to communicate through the Brain-Based Learning model (2) compared the ability of mathematics based on gender through the Brain-Based Learning model (3) to describe the ability of mathematics students to communicate through gender. This study uses a mix method with a sequential Explanatory. The population is the eighth grade high school student of State 31 at the same time. The sample in this study is a class VIII B student determined by random sampling techniques. The subject of this study was taken on the basis of the student gender. There are six students, three male students and three female students. The results of this study show that: (1) the ability of students to communicate mathematically in Pythagorean matter through the Brain-Based Learning model reaches the classical dimension (2) there is no significant difference in the ability of students to communicate mathematically between men and women through the Brain-Based Learning model (3) Women are better at explaining the idea of the situation and the mathematical relationship in writing with real things, images, graphics, and algebra, and also women are better at creating concepts, formulating arguments, and generalization than men. But in terms of connecting real things, images, and diagrams to the idea of mathematics and also in terms of expressing everyday events in language or the symbol of mathematics between students and girls there is no significant difference.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

20 penulis · 33 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 2 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Pamulang
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Isnarto IsnartoState University of Semarang1
Yusna Warni HasibuanState University of Semarang1
Bambang Eko SusiloState University of Semarang1
Gilang Anjar PermatasariState University of Semarang1
Novita HartrianiState University of Semarang1
Kartono KartonoUniversitas Pamulang1
Devita AnggrainiState University of Semarang1
Nurkaromah DwidayatiState University of Semarang1
Dyah PratiwiState University of Semarang1
Mashuri MashuriState University of Semarang1
Wahyu WicaksonoState University of Semarang1
Hardi SuyitnoState University of Semarang1
Eka Nurul UtamiState University of Semarang1
Dwijanto DwijantoState University of Semarang1
Mevi TayaniState University of Semarang1
Ika Wahyu Putri UtamiState University of Semarang1
Arbai Syahidarahma PutriState University of Semarang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujme/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Mathematical Communication Ability with Brain-Based Learning Model in Terms of Gender</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Pertiwi, Hana</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>RD, Nuriana</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Veronica, Rahayu Budhiati</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Mathematical communication ability is one of the basic skills standards in mathematics. However, mathematical communication ability with students is still low. This can be seen from the work of students who still have difficulty expressing mathematical problems with mathematical symbols and have difficulty interpreting mathematical ideas in writing. It seems that students find it difficult to express mathematical ideas into writing. This study aims to (1) determine the attainment of the classic dimension of the ability of mathematics students to communicate through the Brain-Based Learning model (2) compared the ability of mathematics based on gender through the Brain-Based Learning model (3) to describe the ability of mathematics students to communicate through gender. This study uses a mix method with a sequential Explanatory. The population is the eighth grade high school student of State 31 at the same time. The sample in this study is a class VIII B student determined by random sampling techniques. The subject of this study was taken on the basis of the student gender. There are six students, three male students and three female students. The results of this study show that: (1) the ability of students to communicate mathematically in Pythagorean matter through the Brain-Based Learning model reaches the classical dimension (2) there is no significant difference in the ability of students to communicate mathematically between men and women through the Brain-Based Learning model (3) Women are better at explaining the idea of the situation and the mathematical relationship in writing with real things, images, graphics, and algebra, and also women are better at creating concepts, formulating arguments, and generalization than men. But in terms of connecting real things, images, and diagrams to the idea of mathematics and also in terms of expressing everyday events in language or the symbol of mathematics between students and girls there is no significant difference.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-11-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujme/article/view/54140</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ujme.v10i3.54140</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education; Vol 10 No 3 (2021): Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education; 216-221</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2460-5840</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6927</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ujme.v10i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujme/article/view/54140/20979</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>