Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability in Terms of Students Learning Motivation in Probing Prompting Learning

Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education · Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022) · hlm. 183–190

DOI
10.15294/ujme.v11i2.59937
ISSN
2460-5840, 2252-6927
Terbit
2022-08-31
Penerbit
Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This research aimed (1) to analyze the effectiveness of Probing Prompting learning on students' mathematical critical thinking skills and (2) to describe mathematical critical thinking skills in terms of students' learning motivation in learning with the Probing Prompting model. This research method was a combination research method (mixed method) with the type of Explanatory Sequential Design. The results showed that: (1) the mathematical critical thinking ability of the Probing Prompting class achieved classical completeness; (2) the proportion of mathematical critical thinking skills in the Probing Prompting class is more than the proportion of mathematical critical thinking skills in the Problem Based Learning class; (3) the average mathematical critical thinking ability of the Probing Prompting class is more than the average mathematical critical thinking ability of the Problem Based Learning class. Subjects with high learning motivation are able to meet all indicators of mathematical critical thinking skills, namely indicators of clarification, assessment, inference, and strategies. Subjects with moderate learning motivation tend to be able to fulfill the clarification indicators; less able to meet the assessment indicators; tend to be able to meet the inference indicators; and able to meet the indicators of strategies. Subjects with low learning motivation tend to be able to fulfill the indicators of clarification, less able to meet the assessment indicators, less able to meet the inference indicators, and tend to be able to meet the indicators of strategies.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

28 penulis · 59 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Emi PujiastutiState University of Semarang3
Scolastika MarianiState University of Semarang2
Farida NursyahidahState University of Semarang2
WardonoState University of Semarang1
Wardono WardonoState University of Semarang1
Intan WahyuningsihState University of Semarang1
Najmah Fithria QothrunnadaState University of Semarang1
Fenti NugraheniState University of Semarang1
Zaenuri MasturState University of Semarang1
Isti HidayahState University of Semarang1
Ema KhoerunnisaState University of Semarang1
Muhammad Abdul AzizState University of Semarang1
Rochmad RochmadState University of Semarang1
Isnarto IsnartoState University of Semarang1
Nila Kumoro ManahState University of Semarang1
P. WidyaningrumState University of Semarang1
Aizzatun NikmahState University of Semarang1
Endang Retno WinartiState University of Semarang1
Novia Wulan DaryState University of Semarang1
Mashuri MashuriState University of Semarang1
Siti Aminah SilvianiState University of Semarang1
Safana Aulia FazaState University of Semarang1
Kartono KartonoState University of Semarang1
Rohmatin ZukhriyaState University of Semarang1
Sukestiyarno SukestiyarnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zainnur WijayantoState University of Semarang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujme/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability in Terms of Students Learning Motivation in Probing Prompting Learning</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Dewi, Oktriviani</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wijayanti, Kristina</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This research aimed (1) to analyze the effectiveness of Probing Prompting learning on students' mathematical critical thinking skills and (2) to describe mathematical critical thinking skills in terms of students' learning motivation in learning with the Probing Prompting model. This research method was a combination research method (mixed method) with the type of Explanatory Sequential Design. The results showed that: (1) the mathematical critical thinking ability of the Probing Prompting class achieved classical completeness; (2) the proportion of mathematical critical thinking skills in the Probing Prompting class is more than the proportion of mathematical critical thinking skills in the Problem Based Learning class; (3) the average mathematical critical thinking ability of the Probing Prompting class is more than the average mathematical critical thinking ability of the Problem Based Learning class. Subjects with high learning motivation are able to meet all indicators of mathematical critical thinking skills, namely indicators of clarification, assessment, inference, and strategies. Subjects with moderate learning motivation tend to be able to fulfill the clarification indicators; less able to meet the assessment indicators; tend to be able to meet the inference indicators; and able to meet the indicators of strategies. Subjects with low learning motivation tend to be able to fulfill the indicators of clarification, less able to meet the assessment indicators, less able to meet the inference indicators, and tend to be able to meet the indicators of strategies. &amp;nbsp;</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-08-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujme/article/view/59937</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/ujme.v11i2.59937</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education; Vol 11 No 2 (2022): Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education; 183-190</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2460-5840</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6927</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/ujme.v11i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujme/article/view/59937/22575</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>