Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Studi Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching Learning dengan Model Pembelajaran Group Investigation di SMP

Unnes Physics Education Journal · Vol. 6 No. 3 (2017) · hlm. 65–72

DOI
10.15294/upej.v6i3.19268
ISSN
2503-2313, 2252-6935
Terbit
2017-11-17
Penerbit
UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Learning outcomes are the ability possessed wich are knowledge, attitude, and skills. The learning model of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) involves students in activities that relate academic lessons to the context of life. The learning model of Group Investigation (GI) trains students to participate in social systems. This study aims to find out which between the learning model of CTL and learning model of GI that the results of learning are better. The population is the students of class VIII SMP Islam YPI Buaran Pekalongan. The sample used is VIII A as CTL class and VIII B as GI class. The data were collected by using the test to obtain the students' learning result of the cognitive domain, the questionnaire was used to obtain the affective domain learning result, and the observation sheet was used to obtain the psychomotor domain learning result. The learning outcomes of the CTL class students were lower than that of the GI class indicated by the results of the t-test polled variance test. Based on these results it can be concluded that the GI learning model is better than the CTL learning model.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 74 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 1 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • University of Brawijaya
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Sulhadi SulhadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang2
Khumaedi KhumaediAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Stephani Diah PamelasariState University of Semarang2
- NasrodinAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nurma IzzatiState University of Semarang1
Budi HartonoUniversity of Brawijaya1
Markamah MarkamahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Andreas Priyono Budi PrasetyoState University of Semarang1
Demi Roma WinaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wiyanto WiyantoState University of Semarang1
Widi WidayatAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Achmad Rifa’iAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amri AmalAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Supartono SupartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wahyudi WahyudiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
KhumaediState University of Semarang1
Triyan Dewi Noor SaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sukestiyarno SukestiyarnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Akhmad NayazikAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mulyono MulyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anik IsmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
YL SukestiyarnoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Jeliana Intan PermataAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
EllianawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ida SafitriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Suharto LinuwihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Oryza Hesak KarismaningtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti KhanafiyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Gilang Shinta NuraniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
. HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dhimas Nur SetyawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Upik NurbaitiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syifa UlyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Achmad SopyanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Reni AsriningrumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
R Budi SAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/upej/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Studi Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching Learning dengan Model Pembelajaran Group Investigation di SMP</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Mukhlasin, M. Sirojul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Edie, Sukiswo Supeni</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Hindarto, Nathan</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Learning outcomes are the ability possessed wich are knowledge, attitude, and skills. The learning model of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) involves students in activities that relate academic lessons to the context of life. The learning model of Group Investigation (GI) trains students to participate in social systems. This study aims to find out which between the learning model of CTL and learning model of GI that the results of learning are better. The population is the students of class VIII SMP Islam YPI Buaran Pekalongan. The sample used is VIII A as CTL class and VIII B as GI class. The data were collected by using the test to obtain the students' learning result of the cognitive domain, the questionnaire was used to obtain the affective domain learning result, and the observation sheet was used to obtain the psychomotor domain learning result. The learning outcomes of the CTL class students were lower than that of the GI class indicated by the results of the t-test polled variance test. Based on these results it can be concluded that the GI learning model is better than the CTL learning model.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2017-11-17</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/upej/article/view/19268</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/upej.v6i3.19268</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal; Vol 6 No 3 (2017); 65-72</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-2313</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6935</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/upej/article/view/19268/9149</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2017 Unnes Physics Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>