Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Geometric Thinking Levels in Learning Quadrilaterals: A Van Hiele-Based Case Study in a Papuan Junior High School

Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika · Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 124–136

DOI
10.22437/edumatica.v15i2.43719
ISSN
2580-0779, 2088-2157
Terbit
2025-06-30
Penerbit
Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi
Bahasa
en
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This study investigated the geometric thinking levels of eighth-grade students in a Papuan junior high school, using the van Hiele theoretical framework, with a focus on their understanding of quadrilaterals. The research addressed common misconceptions and limited conceptual understanding among students by exploring how they classified, identified, and described the properties of quadrilaterals. A qualitative descriptive design was employed, involving 25 students selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using structured interviews, drawing tasks, and classification activities. The primary instrument included three tasks: drawing various quadrilaterals, identifying and defining their properties, and classifying them based on shared attributes. The results showed that 50% of students operated at van Hiele Level 0 (Visualization), 36% were transitioning between Level 0 and Level 1 (Analysis), and only 14% reached Level 1. Students frequently relied on visual appearance rather than formal geometric attributes, leading to persistent misconceptions about hierarchical relationships among shapes. No students demonstrated reasoning beyond Level 1. The findings emphasized the need for instructional approaches that integrate cultural context, use dynamic visual tools, and scaffold learning to support higher-order geometric reasoning. Further research is recommended to develop culturally responsive models and extend the study across different educational contexts.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

35 penulis · 70 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Gatot SugondoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Happy LumbantobingAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Mayor M H ManurungAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Yosefin Rianita HadiyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ratna Julianti KetarenAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Matius Pai'pinanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
MULIARTO RUBEN GIRIK ALLOAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
MARTHINUS KAYAMEAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
IRFAN WAHYUDIAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rusdin NaiborhuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Matius PaipinanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Naftali TahirAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Marsintauli MarpaungAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
TRIWIYONO TRIWIYONOAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Elizabet KafiarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mochamad ArbiantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lulus Puji AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Evy PujirahayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dewi Kristika Findia Ning TyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fitri Novita SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kiki Ulfi Deri SandyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Roni MatiusAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurul KhotimahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Frita Hoberthina KelmaskosuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yosefin HadiyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
HamdaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
AlbaitiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Samuel SapaloAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
JONNER NAINGGOLANAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alfonsus Simon DowengAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Emanuela Merlin TandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/edumatica/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Geometric Thinking Levels in Learning Quadrilaterals: A Van Hiele-Based Case Study in a Papuan Junior High School</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Tandililing, Pitriana</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sirampun, Elsi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Kho, Ronaldo</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ruamba, Marthinus Yohanes</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">geometric thinking</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Papuan students</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">quadrilaterals</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Van Hiele theory</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study investigated the geometric thinking levels of eighth-grade students in a Papuan junior high school, using the van Hiele theoretical framework, with a focus on their understanding of quadrilaterals. The research addressed common misconceptions and limited conceptual understanding among students by exploring how they classified, identified, and described the properties of quadrilaterals. A qualitative descriptive design was employed, involving 25 students selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using structured interviews, drawing tasks, and classification activities. The primary instrument included three tasks: drawing various quadrilaterals, identifying and defining their properties, and classifying them based on shared attributes. The results showed that 50% of students operated at van Hiele Level 0 (Visualization), 36% were transitioning between Level 0 and Level 1 (Analysis), and only 14% reached Level 1. Students frequently relied on visual appearance rather than formal geometric attributes, leading to persistent misconceptions about hierarchical relationships among shapes. No students demonstrated reasoning beyond Level 1. The findings emphasized the need for instructional approaches that integrate cultural context, use dynamic visual tools, and scaffold learning to support higher-order geometric reasoning. Further research is recommended to develop culturally responsive models and extend the study across different educational contexts.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-06-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/edumatica/article/view/43719</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/edumatica.v15i2.43719</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan matematika (August 2025); 124-136</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika; Vol 15 No 2 (2025): Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan matematika (Agustus 2025); 124-136</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2580-0779</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2088-2157</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/edumatica/article/view/43719/21718</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Pitriana Tandililing, Elsi Sirampun, Ronaldo Kho, Marthinus Yohanes Ruamba</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>