Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal SINTA 1

STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM-SOLVING ABILITY BASED ON TEACHING MODELS INTERVENTION AND COGNITIVE STYLE

Journal on Mathematics Education · Vol. 11 No. 2 (2020) · pp. 209–222

DOI
10.22342/jme.11.2.10744.209-222
ISSN
2407-0610, 2087-8885
Published
2020-04-06
Publisher
Indonesian Mathematical Society
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

The study aimed to analyze the interaction effect teaching models and cognitive style field dependent (FD)-field independent (FI) to students’ mathematical problem-solving ability (MPSA), as well as students' MPSA differences based on teaching models and cognitive styles. Participants in this study were 145 junior high school students, with details of 50 students learning through the Connect, Organize, Reflect, and Extend Realistic Mathematics Education (CORE RME) model, 49 students use the CORE model, and 46 students use the Conventional model. Data collection tools used are the MPSA test, and the group embedded figure test (GEFT). The MPSA test finds out that there are interaction effect teaching models and cognitive styles on students' MPSA, as well as a significant difference in MPSA students who study through the CORE RME model, CORE model, and Conventional model. Based on cognitive style, between students who study through CORE RME model, CORE model, and Conventional model found that there was no significant difference in MPSA between FI students. Furthermore, there were significant differences in MPSA between FD students and also MPSA of FI students better than MPSA FD students. Therefore, teaching models and student cognitive styles are very important to be considered in the learning process, so students are able to solve mathematical problems.

Collaboration network of the authors

39 authors · 100 co-authorship links · 36 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Indonesia University of Education
  • Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero
  • IKIP Siliwangi
  • University of Timor
  • Lambung Mangkurat University
  • State University of Semarang
  • State University of Medan
  • Other organisations
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Dadang JuandiIndonesia University of Education3
Sufyani PrabawantoAffiliation unknown3
Yaya Sukjaya KusumahIndonesia University of Education2
Delsika Pramata SariLambung Mangkurat University2
Tatang HermanIndonesia University of Education2
Didi SuryadiIndonesia University of Education2
Javier García‐GarcíaUniversidad Autónoma de Guerrero2
Bambang Eko SusiloState University of Semarang2
Adi NurjamanIndonesia University of Education1
Edi SupriyadiIndonesia University of Education1
Wahyu HidayatIKIP Siliwangi1
Jozua SabandarIndonesia University of Education1
Edy SuryaState University of Medan1
Zulkardi ZulkardiSriwijaya University1
Bonita HirzaUniversitas Muhammadiyah Palembang1
Damianus Dao SamoUniversity of Nusa Cendana1
Bana G. KartasasmitaIndonesia University of Education1
Rizky RosjanuardiIndonesia University of Education1
Turmudi TurmudiIndonesia University of Education1
Widya KusumaningsihUniversitas PGRI Semarang1
Nelly FitrianiIKIP Siliwangi1
Ika MeikaUniversitas Mathla'ul Anwar Banten1
Camilo Andrés Rodríguez-NietoUniversidad de la Costa1
Sudirman SudirmanIndonesia Open University1
Gida KadarismaIKIP Siliwangi1
Gerardo Salgado-BeltránUniversidad Autónoma de Guerrero1
Elizabeth Santos-CasildoUniversidad Autónoma de Guerrero1
Elah NurlaelahAffiliation unknown1
Dini AndianiAffiliation unknown1
Khairunnisa KhairunnisaAffiliation unknown1
Qania Agustika SiagianAffiliation unknown1
Endang Cahya Mulyaning AsihAffiliation unknown1
Bambang Avip Priatna MartadiputraAffiliation unknown1
Gusni SatriawatiAffiliation unknown1
Al JupriAffiliation unknown1
Sarah InayahAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2407-0610/works, first harvested 28 Oct 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM-SOLVING ABILITY BASED ON TEACHING MODELS INTERVENTION AND COGNITIVE STYLE</dc:title><dc:creator>Son, Aloisius Loka</dc:creator><dc:creator>Darhim, Darhim</dc:creator><dc:creator>Fatimah, Siti</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;The study aimed to analyze the interaction effect teaching models and cognitive style field dependent (FD)-field independent (FI) to students’ mathematical problem-solving ability (MPSA), as well as students' MPSA differences based on teaching models and cognitive styles. Participants in this study were 145 junior high school students, with details of 50 students learning through the Connect, Organize, Reflect, and Extend Realistic Mathematics Education (CORE RME) model, 49 students use the CORE model, and 46 students use the Conventional model. Data collection tools used are the MPSA test, and the group embedded figure test (GEFT). The MPSA test finds out that there are interaction effect teaching models and cognitive styles on students' MPSA, as well as a significant difference in MPSA students who study through the CORE RME model, CORE model, and Conventional model. Based on cognitive style, between students who study through CORE RME model, CORE model, and Conventional model found that there was no significant difference in MPSA between FI students. Furthermore, there were significant differences in MPSA between FD students and also MPSA of FI students better than MPSA FD students. Therefore, teaching models and student cognitive styles are very important to be considered in the learning process, so students are able to solve mathematical problems.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Indonesian Mathematical Society</dc:publisher><dc:date>2020-04-06</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.10744.209-222</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.22342/jme.11.2.10744.209-222</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal on Mathematics Education; Vol 11 No 2 (2020); 209-222</dc:source><dc:source>2407-0610</dc:source><dc:source>2087-8885</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/viewFile/10744/pdf</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>